메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 대한건축학회 논문집 제6권 제3호
발행연도
1990.6
수록면
123 - 133 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Streets occupy a large amount of land in urban residential districts and most of them are through-streets As an alternative to a through-street system, some architects have proposed a cul-de-sacstreet system and made many claims about its impacts on the daily lives of residents. Their claims were diffuse and they provided little evidence of their efficacy. This study establishes a model of territorial performance and hypothesizes that cul-de-sacs are perceived to be more exclusively and peacefully used, safer, conducive to greater social cohesion, and better maintained than through-streets. The validity of the hypotheses was tested by the data obtained through a questionnaire survey in Kwachun, Korea. Statistical analysis revealed that the cul-de-sac residents are more inclined than through-street residents to feel that; (1) they use the streets exclusively and peacefully; (2) their children's play is safe; (3) they distinguish between their neighbors and outsiders; (4) They have strong interaction with neighbors. The claims that cul-de-sacs promote privacy invasion and maintenance responsibility are not valid. Based on the findings, this study suggests that cul-de-sacs be provided for the enhanced territorial control of street areas. It also proposes guidelines which can be applied to the design of inner-city residential blocks.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-540-012900289