메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
전남대학교 5.18연구소 민주주의와 인권 민주주의와 인권 제4권 1호
발행연도
2004.4
수록면
151 - 179 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Newspapers record the history of one day. It can have a great meaning to interpret “Gwangju Democratization Movement” by materials of foreign journalists who were liberated from the censorship of military junta. The German journalists reported and commented the “Gwangju Uprising” as failure. According to their interpretation, after this movement the democratization of Korea was decisively retrogressed, and the political reform and integration of citizen through the dialogue was almost impossible. Of course, there is a lot of difference between the inter pretation of Korean intellectual and it of German journalists, because the truth of incident came to reveal during 20 years and through the “5·18 special laws” new military power was by the civil government punished. In this context, “Gwangju Democratization Movement” which reflects in reporting of German journalists means a only breakdown of the democratization by the brutal slaughter of the military. Even if the citizen army which was loosely organized by students accomplished rising in arms against new military power, like “civil war”, it was still incompetent to build the democracy of Korea. Naturally, as a great obstacle for the democratization remained deeply in the mind of German journalists Hitler’s army of “3rd empire” which became a supernational power and U.S. army in Korea which exercised decisive influence in the new military power.

목차

I. 서 론

Ⅱ. 매체별 기사 내용분석

Ⅲ. 보도내용 평가

Ⅳ. 결론: 독일 언론보도와 광주민중항쟁의 역사적 의미

참 고 문 헌

참고문헌 (11)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-340-014080631