메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 구조계 대한건축학회논문집 - 구조계 제20권 제6호
발행연도
2004.6
수록면
141 - 148 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the construction industry, claims are considered as a part of contract administration. Amongst the most common
claims in construction are those over delay. An effective tool to analyze causation and effect of construction delay is
required for the construction industry, which has many potential dispute factors. Common delay analysis methods are
performed by contrasting the as-planned schedules and the as-built schedules. By investigating the delay analysis
methods generally accepted and used, this study could detect some problems that appear in analysis of actual schedule
delay. The most important problem in delay analysis methods is the ambiguity of the concurrent delay analysis.
Therefore, the objective of this study is to propose an effective and reasonable method to evaluate the concurrent delay.
To achieve these objectives, a delay analysis method using Delay Section (DS) concept is proposed. It adopts the
procedure of Contemporaneous Period Analysis (CPA), and contains a new concept. By using the DS concept, a delay
analyst can divide concurrent delay into one delay-occurred section and two or more delays-occurred sections, so that
the ambiguity of the analysis time unit in performing delays analysis can be resolved. In addition, it performs an
important role in analyzing and apportioning concurrent delays because the duration of all delays-occurred periods can be
clearly defined as one delay-occurred part and two or more delays-occurred parts with the same start points and the
same finish points. An application study is performed to illustrate the proposed concurrent delay analysis method.

목차

Abstract

1. 서론

2. 공기지연 분석방법 관련 문헌고찰

3. 문제의 제기

4. 동시발생 공기지연 분석방법 제안

5. 분석방법의 유효성 검토

6. 결론

참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-540-014285736