메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 대한건축학회논문집 - 계획계 제20권 제10호
발행연도
2004.10
수록면
149 - 156 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Even though housing developers in Korea recently started to research on design methods in response to various users' need for sustainable and friendly environment and, changing circumstances of housing development, there exist needs for well-designed public outdoor space and master planning for the comfort of future residents. However, it has raised questions about the appropriate design method and its performances in the development process from the aspect of planning concepts, decision making process, building construction, marketing, administrative supports, etc. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of various design methods and its effects in design process for housing complexes. It also aimed to suggest adequate design methods for each development case, including master plan for the future housing development. Literature survey found that there were slight differences among various design methods and the application of design method were important in selecting preferred development concepts. More over, expert opinion survey indicated that Master Architect(MA) design method was predominant over other design methods in inducing diverse concepts, constructing public open space, coordinatig with upper planning elements, and processing of master plan Cross-check through the case study also indicated that MA design method was significant in reflecting side walking axis, central plaza, supportive facilities, vanous unit plans, diverse orientations, type of building blocks, water related facilities and connection with neighborhood blocks.

목차

Abstract

1. 연구배경 및 목적

2. 연구범위 및 방법

3. 각 설계방식의 이론적 고찰

4. 설문조사를 통한 각 설계방식 비교분석

5. 설계방식별 사례지구 계획특성 비교분석

6. 결론

참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-540-014346725