메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 기업법연구 제18권 제2호
발행연도
2004.12
수록면
245 - 274 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The field of biotechnology has quickly evolved into a major industry in the world. For this reason, creators of biotechnology have been very interested in obtaining intellectual property protection for their recoveries. Without the potential future economic gain from such discoveries, scientists and investors would not have the incentive to invest in the biotechnology industry, especially in view of the fact that biotechnological research is very tune consuming, technical and expensive
The traditional mode of intellectual property protection for biotechnology has been Via the patent law. However, several requirements within patent law have been described as being unsuitable for biotechnological inventions, especially in light of certain recent court decisions.
Therefore, copyright law has been suggested as an alternative to patent law for conferring intellectual property protection for biotechnology. Nevertheless, copyright protection for biotechnology has been confronted with serious opposition. This has been due primarily to the theory that copyright protection traditionally was intended only for works of expressive art and not for functional works
As a counter-argument to the opponents of expending copyright protection for biotechnology, however, stands the strong analogy between biotechnology and computer software, the latter of which has already been extended protection by copyright Thus, proponents for extending copyright protection to biotechnology rely heavily on the similarities between biotechnological inventions and computer software. This paper discussed the field of biotechnology and several modes of obtaining intellectual property protection for biotechnological inventions. Initially, the paper set forth some background on the science of biotechnology, thus allowing the reader to gain a deeper understanding of the critical issues regarding the biotechnology industry and the areas within the technology which are susceptible to intellectual property protection Next, the paper provided a discussion of the similarities and differences between biotechnology and computer software. This was intended to further the reader's understanding of the analogy winch would be discussed in the copyright section of the paper
The paper did then provide a general discussion regarding issues relating to patent protection for biotechnological inventions. After addressing the shortcomings of patent law for protecting biotechnological innovations. As stated above, much of the discussion revolved around the similarities between biotechnology and computer software In view of the fact that computer applications, even operating systems that communicate directly with the computer hardware have been copyrighted, copyright protection should be extended to biotechnology.
Finally. a conclusion was provided which summarizes the main points of the paper and addresses future directions for intellectual property protection for biotechnology Thus, The proponents for copyright for biotechnology can properly argue that Congress, by not expressly prohibiting biotechnology in §4, may be indirectly supporting copyright for biotechnology Congress has passively authorized the copyright protection for software.
Based on current case law and the arguments presented in this paper, it seems likely that Courts will have to decide that biotechnology is indeed copyrightable Once tins happen, it will be up to Congress to decide if they wish to codify those decisions to allow copyright for biotechnology, or they will have to amend §4 to expressly prohibit copyright of biotechnology

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 지적재산권 보호와 생명공학

Ⅲ. 컴퓨터 소프트웨어와 DNA 재조합기술의 유사성

Ⅳ. 생명공학의 지적재산권 보호

Ⅴ. 결론

♣ 참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-014440259