메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 중국어문학논집 제35호
발행연도
2005.12
수록면
91 - 104 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language is an area of investigation which draws on many other fields such as linguistic theory, education, psychology, sociology, second language acquisition and others. It can't adopt the research paradigm of any one of these related fields but must develop methodologies of its own which allow for a variety of approaches and flexibility in investigating research questions. In this paper, we strongly propose that triangulation research methods will prove to be the best choices for the field of Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language. In the social sciences,  triangulation  is often used to indicate that more than one method is used in a study with a view to double-or-triple-checking results in order to increase validity. By "triangulation", in this paper, we mean approaches which constitute a combination and integration of qualitative and quantitative elements. These elements may be so closely related as to be practically indistinguishable re: systematic content analysis. In other words, triangulation approaches are composed of a number of phases, some of which are qualitative, others quantitative; all, however, are equally necessary for achieving the objective of the approach. Triangulation approaches are grounded in a firmly positivist perspective, so we believe that qualitative work can assist quantitative work in providing a theoretical framework, contextualizing the problems, validating and analyzing survey data, interpreting statistical relationships and summarizing as well as interpreting the research results, etc. The reverse should also be true: quantitative work can assist qualitative. By doing so, we can correct the so-called "holistic fallacy".

목차

一、 引言

二、 什마是 “科硏”?

三、 對外漢語敎學硏究有什마模式?

四、 什마是“定量”硏究? 什마是“定性”硏究?

五、 對外漢語敎學硏究應采用什마科硏的方法和技術路線?

六、 結語

〈參考文獻〉

〈ABSTRACT〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-820-015183005