지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to examine in the probability of the establishment of a Northeast Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Zone by comparison with the Southeast Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Zone (SEANWFZ).
The denuclearization of the Northeast Asia is a promising alternative to build the permanent peace system, construct the favorable environment for the reunification of the divided Korean peninsular and formulate the long-term security strategy of ROK. In addition, recently the nuclear danger is gradually increasing in the Northeast Asia. because of the adoption of preemptive nuclear attack strategy of U.S., alleged nuclear weapon development of the DPRK and the ambition for nuclear-weapon states of Japan. We have to focus attention on the fact that Japan is ready to produce nuclear weapon within a short period of time. Japan has acquired all the technology needed for production and the nuclear material.
So far, four NWFZs have constituted in relatively highly populated areas. In particular SEANWFZ which was signed at the ASEAN Summit in Bangkok on 15 December 1995 is the model and standard to establish NWFZ in the Northeast Asia.
There are the common and difference between in the Northeast and Southeast Asia in security environment. The distinguishing features of the Northeast Asia’ security environment in comparison with the Southeast Asia region as follows. First, the nuclear-weapon states such as U.S., Russia and China are the party countries of the treaty. Second, there are many U.S. military bases and U.S. troops in large scale station in South Korea and Japan. Third, Many nuclear weapons were deployed by nuclear-weapon states. For that reason, there are still many obstacles to establish the NWFZ in this region. Therefore in order to establish the Northeast Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone, it is necessary to get rid of this obstacles.
Of course, for the present it is fact that the security environment in the Northeast Asia is unfavourable to the creation of NWFZ. But there is an increasing degree of consensus on necessity for the establishment of NWFZ in this region. It is time to discuss and negotiate sincerely on this matter.
The denuclearization of the Northeast Asia is a promising alternative to build the permanent peace system, construct the favorable environment for the reunification of the divided Korean peninsular and formulate the long-term security strategy of ROK. In addition, recently the nuclear danger is gradually increasing in the Northeast Asia. because of the adoption of preemptive nuclear attack strategy of U.S., alleged nuclear weapon development of the DPRK and the ambition for nuclear-weapon states of Japan. We have to focus attention on the fact that Japan is ready to produce nuclear weapon within a short period of time. Japan has acquired all the technology needed for production and the nuclear material.
So far, four NWFZs have constituted in relatively highly populated areas. In particular SEANWFZ which was signed at the ASEAN Summit in Bangkok on 15 December 1995 is the model and standard to establish NWFZ in the Northeast Asia.
There are the common and difference between in the Northeast and Southeast Asia in security environment. The distinguishing features of the Northeast Asia’ security environment in comparison with the Southeast Asia region as follows. First, the nuclear-weapon states such as U.S., Russia and China are the party countries of the treaty. Second, there are many U.S. military bases and U.S. troops in large scale station in South Korea and Japan. Third, Many nuclear weapons were deployed by nuclear-weapon states. For that reason, there are still many obstacles to establish the NWFZ in this region. Therefore in order to establish the Northeast Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone, it is necessary to get rid of this obstacles.
Of course, for the present it is fact that the security environment in the Northeast Asia is unfavourable to the creation of NWFZ. But there is an increasing degree of consensus on necessity for the establishment of NWFZ in this region. It is time to discuss and negotiate sincerely on this matter.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 동남아 비핵지대의 성립과 특징
Ⅲ. 비핵지대 창설을 위한 동북아와 동남아의 지역적 여건 비교
Ⅳ. 동북아 비핵지대 창설을 위한 조건과 방안
Ⅴ. 맺는말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Northeast Asian Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone Is Unrealistic
Global Asia
2010 .09
-
Northeast Asia : the Nuclear Complication
국제정치논총
1980 .12
-
핵무기 강의의 교과과정 구성 연구
국제정치연구
2010 .12
-
North Korea’s Nuclear Decision-making and Plausible Scenarios
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2013 .01
-
북한의 핵실험이 동북아지역의 평화·안보질서에 미치는 영향
한국동북아논총
2007 .06
-
A Proposal for a Nuclear Weapons-Free Zone in Northeast Asia
Global Asia
2011 .12
-
국제법상 환경보호를 위한 핵무기 규제에 관한 연구
한양법학
2019 .08
-
5개 비핵지대조약에 관한 비교 고찰
국제정치논총
1998 .02
-
NORTH KOREA AND NUCLEAR DETERRENCE
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2004 .01
-
Achieving Peace and Security in Korea and Northeast Asia
국제지역학논총
2008 .12
-
Energy Security in Northeast Asia
Global Asia
2006 .09
-
THE TRIPARTITE NUCLEAR-WEAPON-FREE ZONE IN NORTHEAST ASIA: A LONG-TERM OBJECTIVE OF THE SIX-PARTY TALKS
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2003 .01
-
제3차 북핵 실험과 국제법적 쟁점 검토
외법논집
2014 .01
-
동북아 원자력 환경위험 커뮤니케이션 - 중국 언론의 원자력발전 보도 내용분석을 중심으로 -
Crisisonomy
2018 .01
-
북한 핵무기 무력화를 위한 한국의 군사적 대응방향
한반도선진화재단 기타 단행본
2012 .03
-
核武器 使用의 違法性과 核抑止 論理
법학연구
2006 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-015553304