지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As we embrace the 21st century, Information technology(IT) is accompanied by the inflows of vast amount of terms to each country. As a result, a huge confusion has been caused in the acceptance system of the words of foreign origin. In this regard, this research analyzed linguistic characters of IT-related terms used in the daily newspapers of Korea, China and Japan (Chosun Ilbo, Renmin Ribao, and Yomiuri Shinbun) from January 1, 2005 through January 31, 2005. The linguistic and social and cultural characteristics and differences of the abovementioned three countries were compared, and the problems arising from the acceptance of the words of foreign origin were diagnosed as follows:
1) As for individual number of vocabulary of IT terms with foreign origin, Japan has three to four times more than Korea and China. This implies that Japan's ubiquitous environmental creation, and sharing and popularization of information are relatively higher than Korea and China.
2) The terms in the areas of IT and information society, and hi-tech were remarkably used in Korea and Japan, while the terms within the category of computer and Internet were conspicuously used in China. From this, the socially and culturally interested fields of the three countries were identified through comparison.
3) China had two times more total vocabularies than Korea and Japan, and had the highest ratio at 45% in terms of top 10 vocabularies by frequency.
4) Japan had 16 words in the dual form example of the IT words of foreign origin, which overwhelmed Korea and China.
5) Looking into word composition, Korea and Japan had very high ratio of compound words. Especially, Japan had high ratio of partially cut form of words, and high use ratio of derivative words.
6) In terms of languages, Japan, Korea and China used English and mixed languages in order. Acronym use rates rapidly increased in Korea, China and Japan, which led to a concern that information sharing between societal members could be difficult.
As a result of this research, the three countries’ linguistic characteristics and social and cultural differences were investigated. In terms of indication of IT-related terms with foreign origin, it was confirmed that confusion in the existing system was brought about to all the three countries. In view of this, we actively need to organize an expert organization, and seek to control the use of terms and pursue a possibility to unify the terms used in Korea, China, and Japan.
1) As for individual number of vocabulary of IT terms with foreign origin, Japan has three to four times more than Korea and China. This implies that Japan's ubiquitous environmental creation, and sharing and popularization of information are relatively higher than Korea and China.
2) The terms in the areas of IT and information society, and hi-tech were remarkably used in Korea and Japan, while the terms within the category of computer and Internet were conspicuously used in China. From this, the socially and culturally interested fields of the three countries were identified through comparison.
3) China had two times more total vocabularies than Korea and Japan, and had the highest ratio at 45% in terms of top 10 vocabularies by frequency.
4) Japan had 16 words in the dual form example of the IT words of foreign origin, which overwhelmed Korea and China.
5) Looking into word composition, Korea and Japan had very high ratio of compound words. Especially, Japan had high ratio of partially cut form of words, and high use ratio of derivative words.
6) In terms of languages, Japan, Korea and China used English and mixed languages in order. Acronym use rates rapidly increased in Korea, China and Japan, which led to a concern that information sharing between societal members could be difficult.
As a result of this research, the three countries’ linguistic characteristics and social and cultural differences were investigated. In terms of indication of IT-related terms with foreign origin, it was confirmed that confusion in the existing system was brought about to all the three countries. In view of this, we actively need to organize an expert organization, and seek to control the use of terms and pursue a possibility to unify the terms used in Korea, China, and Japan.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 韓ㆍ中ㆍ日 일간신문의 IT 외래어 분석
3. IT 관련 외래어의 사회언어학적 특징
4. 맺는말
【參考文獻】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Korea and Japan
Korea Journal
1967 .08
-
번역학 용어 번역 유형에 관한 한일 비교 고찰
번역학연구
2013 .03
-
韓ㆍ中ㆍ日 3國의 國民學校 社會科 國史敎育課程 比較硏究
역사교육
1981 .06
-
중국 대외관계의 역사적 변화와 한일관계
한국민족문화
2001 .09
-
일본 과거사 문제와 한중의 대응
일본문화연구
2015 .01
-
한일관계, 무엇을 할 것인가?
한국여성신학
2019 .06
-
History and Territorial Disputes, Domestic Politics, and International Relations: An Analysis of the Relationship among South Korea, China, and Japan
Korea Observer
2019 .01
-
Linguistic ties Between Korea and Japan
Korea Journal
1973 .03
-
Korean Studies in Japan
Korea Journal
1985 .12
-
Origins of Time-Keeping Mechanisms : Similarities in China and Korea
Korea Journal
1975 .08
-
日本知識人の中国認識について —尾崎護の 「吉野作造と中国」を手がかりに—
日本思想
2011 .01
-
李鴻章의 대일 인식과 외교책략 : 1870년대를 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2011 .06
-
Korean Studies Research in Japan
Korea Journal
1992 .06
-
언론을 통해 본 한일협정 인식 50년
역사비평
2015 .05
-
독도 영유권에 대한 전후 연합국의 영토처리
일본문화학보
2020 .05
-
Opening of Korea and Her Fall to Japan
Korea Journal
1962 .04
-
한국어 학습자용 외래어 사전 편찬을 위한 기초 연구
한국사전학
2012 .11
-
가사를 통해 본 중국과 일본
어문연구
2006 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-820-017187216