지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The 1940’s literature should be separately examined as the former term's and the latter term's. The literature of the former period was called as the dark ages of the Korean literature, as the end of the Japanese imperialism, however, the literature of the latter period played the important role in ideological conflicts, as well as reflected on the colonial era. Since the literature of the former period and that of the latter period were based on the different spaces each other, they should be studied separately. Therefore, in this study, the literature of the former period, the end of the Japanese colonialism will be examined.
The literature of the end of the Japanese Imperialism was characterized as political works. As a result, the study on the literature in this period are able to make clear its characteristics, only when examined connected with the national policies in the end of the Japanese imperialism. The pro-Japanese literature in this period tends to be studied as following three views. The first view is to explain the meaning of the pro-Japanese literature and the characteristics of the works, the second view is to explain the characteristics of Manchurian literature, and the third view is to explicate the characteristics of the works written in Japanese. As the study of the pro-Japanese literature was started by Lim Jong-kuk, in 1966. it was put into shape by Chang Duk-Soon, Song Min-Ho, and Shin Hi-Kyo in the 1990's. In the 2000's, Kim Jae-Young, Ryu Bo-Sun took an interests in the notion and methodology of the pro-Japanese literature. The studies on Manchurian literature has been done by Kim Yoon-Sik, Oh Yang-Ho, and Cho Jin-Ki. The studies also revealed the feature of the Manchurian literature, only when connected with Japan's colonial rule of Manchuria. The works written in Japanese was studied by Kim Yoon-Sik and Rho Sang-Rae. However, the studies should have been focused on the directivity of the works, beyond the level of language expression itself.
The pro-Japanese literature can be called as a national literature, in terms of inculcating the readers with the national policies of Japanese imperialism, and forcing to act. Therefore, the studies on pro-Japanese literature must show how the Japan's national policies to be expressed in the literary works. To do that, the criticism on the original texts should be done simultaneously.
The literature of the end of the Japanese Imperialism was characterized as political works. As a result, the study on the literature in this period are able to make clear its characteristics, only when examined connected with the national policies in the end of the Japanese imperialism. The pro-Japanese literature in this period tends to be studied as following three views. The first view is to explain the meaning of the pro-Japanese literature and the characteristics of the works, the second view is to explain the characteristics of Manchurian literature, and the third view is to explicate the characteristics of the works written in Japanese. As the study of the pro-Japanese literature was started by Lim Jong-kuk, in 1966. it was put into shape by Chang Duk-Soon, Song Min-Ho, and Shin Hi-Kyo in the 1990's. In the 2000's, Kim Jae-Young, Ryu Bo-Sun took an interests in the notion and methodology of the pro-Japanese literature. The studies on Manchurian literature has been done by Kim Yoon-Sik, Oh Yang-Ho, and Cho Jin-Ki. The studies also revealed the feature of the Manchurian literature, only when connected with Japan's colonial rule of Manchuria. The works written in Japanese was studied by Kim Yoon-Sik and Rho Sang-Rae. However, the studies should have been focused on the directivity of the works, beyond the level of language expression itself.
The pro-Japanese literature can be called as a national literature, in terms of inculcating the readers with the national policies of Japanese imperialism, and forcing to act. Therefore, the studies on pro-Japanese literature must show how the Japan's national policies to be expressed in the literary works. To do that, the criticism on the original texts should be done simultaneously.
목차
영어 초록
Ⅰ. 40년대 현실과 문학 현장
Ⅱ. 일제말기 문학현장과 작가적 태도
Ⅲ. 일제말기 문학연구의 현황
Ⅳ. 일제말기 문학 연구의 방향과 과제
참고문헌
저자소개
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Critical View on Pro-Japanese Literature
Korea Journal
1973 .02
-
Japanese Language - Literature in Korea
Korea Journal
1985 .11
-
경남 지역문학과 부왜활동
한국문학논총
2002 .01
-
수용자 입장에서 본 일본문학의 번역양상(1) : 시대별 현상 분석
아시아문화연구
2007 .05
-
일본문학의 한국어번역에 관한 통사적 고찰
아시아문화연구
2007 .05
-
‘친일문학’과 문학교육
문학교육학
2011 .01
-
일제말 친일시의 계보
우리말글
2006 .04
-
매체언어를 통한 일본 문학교육 연구 : 대학에서의 교양수업을 중심으로
일어일문학
2018 .11
-
세계화 시대의 한국문학 : 세계문학과 지역문학의 좌표
국어국문학
2010 .08
-
일본문학의 한국적 수용과 특징 : 무라카미 하루키 소설과 ‘문화’번역
아시아문화연구
2007 .11
-
[특집/친일문학] 친일문학의 역사철학적 맥락
한국근대문학연구
2003 .04
-
친일문학 재론-두 개의 강박을 넘어서
한국근대문학연구
2008 .04
-
일제말기 문학인들의 대일 협력 유형과 의미
한국현대문학연구
2007 .08
-
『國民文學』좌담회에 나타난 ‘文學’ 역할과 ‘文化’ 변용
일어일문학
2015 .02
-
Korean Literature in Manchuria : Exile and Immigrant Literature during the Japanese Colonial Period
Korea Journal
1996 .12
-
과학으로서의 문학 개념의 형성과 ‘知’의 표준화 - 주요 ‘문학개론서’를 중심으로 -
동방학지
2010 .01
-
일제하 이중어문학의 연구 성과와 기대 효과
어문학
2008 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-710-017255932