지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, the Three dynasties’ responses toward Chinese Sui and Tang dynasties’ Eastern policies are examined. Their responses will also be compared with each other. Especially, certain factors, such as the situations those three dynasties were going through at the time, or the historical experiences those dynasties had been accumulating during the 5th and 6th centuries, which would have undoubtedly effected their responses to the Chinese policies, will be examined as well.
Nearing the end of the era of Northern and Southern Dynasty Leagues, China became more and more centralized, and such changes effected the forms of the appointment titles that the Chinese government had been handing out to nearby regions. Titles like General(‘Janggun/將軍’) or Dodok Jaegunsa/都督諸軍事, which were used in bestowals granting local personnel the independent authority over outskirt regions, were dropped from being used. In the meantime, entities like Hungwan/勳官(elderly statesmen) and other bestowed titles(Jakho/爵號), which were symbols of the Sino-central protocols, were elevated. Chinese dynasties like Sui and Tang started to bestow these appointment titles, in their efforts of establishing a new world order, with China at the center.
During the Sui dynasty period, the appointment titles were bestowed to the kings of the three dynasties, and during the Tang dynasty period those titles were bestowed to the heads of independent political entities. Kings of the Koguryo dynasty received appointment titles which were titles that inherited the tradition of past titles such as Gun-gong-ho/郡公號(title for the Gun/郡 lord) and Bonguk Wang-ho/本國王號(Royal title for the country head). Kings of the Baekje and Shilla dynasties also received similar appointment titles. What should be noted, is that although Sui and Tang dynasties were trying to establish a Sino-centric world order by giving out all these titles, the three dynasties of the Korean peninsula seem to have been responding based upon the traditional perception they had earlier had toward China.
In fact, Koguryo maintained its foreign policy based upon its own view of the international order and its own experience of already establishing an independent power block in East Asia. And Baekje continued its efforts of On the other hand, in comparison Shilla lacked such international experience, and instead chose to cooperate with Sui or Tang, therefore pursuing a foreign policy that was fairly different from those of Koguryo and Baekje. From this, we can see that the historical experiences the three dynasties were having during the 5th and 6th centuries did effect their foreign policies in the late 6th century, and their responses to the Eastern policies of the Sui and Tang dynasties as well.
Nearing the end of the era of Northern and Southern Dynasty Leagues, China became more and more centralized, and such changes effected the forms of the appointment titles that the Chinese government had been handing out to nearby regions. Titles like General(‘Janggun/將軍’) or Dodok Jaegunsa/都督諸軍事, which were used in bestowals granting local personnel the independent authority over outskirt regions, were dropped from being used. In the meantime, entities like Hungwan/勳官(elderly statesmen) and other bestowed titles(Jakho/爵號), which were symbols of the Sino-central protocols, were elevated. Chinese dynasties like Sui and Tang started to bestow these appointment titles, in their efforts of establishing a new world order, with China at the center.
During the Sui dynasty period, the appointment titles were bestowed to the kings of the three dynasties, and during the Tang dynasty period those titles were bestowed to the heads of independent political entities. Kings of the Koguryo dynasty received appointment titles which were titles that inherited the tradition of past titles such as Gun-gong-ho/郡公號(title for the Gun/郡 lord) and Bonguk Wang-ho/本國王號(Royal title for the country head). Kings of the Baekje and Shilla dynasties also received similar appointment titles. What should be noted, is that although Sui and Tang dynasties were trying to establish a Sino-centric world order by giving out all these titles, the three dynasties of the Korean peninsula seem to have been responding based upon the traditional perception they had earlier had toward China.
In fact, Koguryo maintained its foreign policy based upon its own view of the international order and its own experience of already establishing an independent power block in East Asia. And Baekje continued its efforts of On the other hand, in comparison Shilla lacked such international experience, and instead chose to cooperate with Sui or Tang, therefore pursuing a foreign policy that was fairly different from those of Koguryo and Baekje. From this, we can see that the historical experiences the three dynasties were having during the 5th and 6th centuries did effect their foreign policies in the late 6th century, and their responses to the Eastern policies of the Sui and Tang dynasties as well.
목차
머리말
1. 남북조 말기 책봉호(冊封號) 구성의 변화
2. 수(隋)의 동방정책과 삼국의 대응
3. 당(唐) 초의 동방정책과 삼국의 대응
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
5세기 동아시아에서의 책봉호의 정치적 의미 : 백제 및 남조 주변제국에 수여된 장군호를 중심으로
역사와 세계
2017 .12
-
隋唐시기 高句麗 遠征과 儀禮
역사와 담론
2012 .04
-
고구려 후기 고구려, 수ㆍ당, 북방 제국의 대립관계
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
남북국(南北國)의 책봉호(冊封號)에 대한 기초적 검토
역사와현실
2006 .09
-
中國園林의 歷史的 變遷에 관하여(Ⅱ)
중국문학
2002 .01
-
隋代의 文學 作品 속에 보이는 高句麗 -｢無向遼東浪死歌｣를 중심으로-
동방한문학
2015 .01
-
高句麗は 隋の 關係
고구려발해연구
2002 .12
-
6~7세기 고구려와 백제의 상호관계
고구려발해연구
2005 .09
-
徐霞客과 ≪徐霞客遊記≫ 연구(2) - 명칭과 체제 및 내용을 중심으로
중국문학
2007 .01
-
기능주의적 관점에서 본 소설 제목의 번역 - 하위 장르별 변환(shifts)현상을 중심으로 -
통역과 번역
2009 .01
-
612년 여 · 수 전쟁과 고구려의 첩보전
민족문화
2007 .12
-
隋唐法律文化散论
중국사연구
2014 .01
-
제목을 통한 한시 해석의 중요성과 그 이유
한국문학논총
2008 .01
-
功臣號를 통해 본 高麗王國 冊封
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2000 .06
-
번역된 소설 제목의 분석 : 등가와 기능
번역학연구
2016 .09
-
隋代 摩崖造像에 대한 硏究 - 東部地域을 中心으로 -
역사와경계
2004 .03
-
[기획1 : 한ㆍ중 역사인식의 접점] 「광개토왕릉비」에 나타난 고구려의 대중인식(對中認識)과 대외정책
역사와현실
2005 .03
-
백제에서의 장군호 수용과 막부제
역사와현실
2015 .09
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-017333341