메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국법학회 법학연구 法學硏究 第17輯
발행연도
2004.12
수록면
617 - 636 (20page)

이용수

DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Constitutionalism constitution in modern ages was established on basis of freedom natural-law idea in modern times, It made inherent right principle in natural-law idea a idea of constitution and its guiding principle. Therefore it can be said that constitutionalism constitution in modern ages was formalized by making nation's natural right idea like norm of positive constitution.
But constitutionalism constitution in modern ages on the basic of this natural law idea neglected national basic rights of natural law or legal justification by social and economical in equality, which is brought about by big gulf between rich and poor in the course of indurial capitalism developing, and emerging of law positivism loving dictatorial authority and totalitarianism national authority. In addition, its idea and value could not help being hurt greatly be increasing civil right violation from through government power displaying rightfulness of positive law. Civil right violation from the criminal investigation course of a suspected person, human negligence and alienation phenomenon from the climate of agoism and epicurism in the present ages, negligence treatment of nation's sovereignty through the counting of taking political power, and other phenomena is raising self-awakening that the natural law matters should be treated newly in the present ages.
A modern natural law argumentist who tried to overcome the inconsistence and limitations of law positivism accept the natural law as the principle of regulation of man. They tried to make it clear that the natural law is related to the reasoning power of man, and that man can find it in his real nature by means of his reasoning power. A modern natural law argumentist also try to include the concrete natural law principles on the basis of the personality and society of man, and they accept the historicity of human nature in the natural law.
In a modern natural law argumentist, the purpose of law is common good and the ideology of law is rightness and thus they think the purpose is one and the ideology is another being different from Positivists.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 자연법의 사상적 기초
Ⅲ. Scholar 철학의 자연법사상
Ⅳ. 신자연법론과 법실증주의
Ⅴ. 마무리
參考文獻
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-017568158