지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Constitutionalism constitution in modern ages was established on basis of freedom natural-law idea in modern times, It made inherent right principle in natural-law idea a idea of constitution and its guiding principle. Therefore it can be said that constitutionalism constitution in modern ages was formalized by making nation's natural right idea like norm of positive constitution.
But constitutionalism constitution in modern ages on the basic of this natural law idea neglected national basic rights of natural law or legal justification by social and economical in equality, which is brought about by big gulf between rich and poor in the course of indurial capitalism developing, and emerging of law positivism loving dictatorial authority and totalitarianism national authority. In addition, its idea and value could not help being hurt greatly be increasing civil right violation from through government power displaying rightfulness of positive law. Civil right violation from the criminal investigation course of a suspected person, human negligence and alienation phenomenon from the climate of agoism and epicurism in the present ages, negligence treatment of nation's sovereignty through the counting of taking political power, and other phenomena is raising self-awakening that the natural law matters should be treated newly in the present ages.
A modern natural law argumentist who tried to overcome the inconsistence and limitations of law positivism accept the natural law as the principle of regulation of man. They tried to make it clear that the natural law is related to the reasoning power of man, and that man can find it in his real nature by means of his reasoning power. A modern natural law argumentist also try to include the concrete natural law principles on the basis of the personality and society of man, and they accept the historicity of human nature in the natural law.
In a modern natural law argumentist, the purpose of law is common good and the ideology of law is rightness and thus they think the purpose is one and the ideology is another being different from Positivists.
But constitutionalism constitution in modern ages on the basic of this natural law idea neglected national basic rights of natural law or legal justification by social and economical in equality, which is brought about by big gulf between rich and poor in the course of indurial capitalism developing, and emerging of law positivism loving dictatorial authority and totalitarianism national authority. In addition, its idea and value could not help being hurt greatly be increasing civil right violation from through government power displaying rightfulness of positive law. Civil right violation from the criminal investigation course of a suspected person, human negligence and alienation phenomenon from the climate of agoism and epicurism in the present ages, negligence treatment of nation's sovereignty through the counting of taking political power, and other phenomena is raising self-awakening that the natural law matters should be treated newly in the present ages.
A modern natural law argumentist who tried to overcome the inconsistence and limitations of law positivism accept the natural law as the principle of regulation of man. They tried to make it clear that the natural law is related to the reasoning power of man, and that man can find it in his real nature by means of his reasoning power. A modern natural law argumentist also try to include the concrete natural law principles on the basis of the personality and society of man, and they accept the historicity of human nature in the natural law.
In a modern natural law argumentist, the purpose of law is common good and the ideology of law is rightness and thus they think the purpose is one and the ideology is another being different from Positivists.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 자연법의 사상적 기초
Ⅲ. Scholar 철학의 자연법사상
Ⅳ. 신자연법론과 법실증주의
Ⅴ. 마무리
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
WHAT IS LAW
저스티스
1965 .04
-
토마스 아퀴나스의 자연법과 정의 사상 : 그의 법사상의 신학적,철학적 기초와 관련하여
중앙법학
2014 .09
-
한국 법체계에서 자연법론의 형성과 발전 -과거를 되돌아보며 미래를 가늠하다-
법철학연구
2008 .12
-
한·중 환경기본법 비교 : 중국의 「환경보호법」을 중심으로
중앙법학
2009 .08
-
이슬람과 자연법
중동문제연구
2011 .01
-
事物의 本性論과 現代法學
법학연구
2002 .12
-
로스쿨에서 형사소송법 교육
형사법연구
2008 .01
-
충남대학교 법학전문대학원의 민법 교육과정 및 교육방법
법학연구
2008 .12
-
자연법과 전쟁 : 후고 그로티우스의『전쟁과 평화의 법』을 중심으로
군사
2014 .06
-
민법 제1조와 不文民法의 法源性
동북아법연구
2012 .01
-
사회변화에 따른 한국 민법의 개정과 과제
법학논총
2018 .01
-
미국 상사법의 개별입법화 동향
기업법연구
2009 .12
-
OBSERVE THE LAW
저스티스
1964 .05
-
공법과 사법 구분의 기원 · 변천 및 당위체계에 관한 연구 : 금전급부 8 유형론의 구체적 실례 및 그 정리와 해결을 중심으로
저스티스
2015 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-017568158