지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.4
- 수록면
- 66 - 84 (19page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
During the presidential election of December, 2002 it was, without difficulties anticipated, that decentralization reform was supposed to be put into action to an extent which would be higher than ever if president candidate Mr. Rho had won the president election of December, 2002. Because he announced quite often his pledges which was characterized by a higher level of decentralization reform planning.
Since the inauguration of the Participation Government whose title was created by president Rho's political intention that he would enhance people's participation in his government sequent measures have been taken in order to carry out his pledges in association with decentralization reform.
An organization named as "Government Innovation and Decentralization Committee (hereinafter referred to as Committee)" was established in April, 2003. One of the major missions of the Committee is to carry out matters with decentralization reform, including planning of and conducting researches associated with decentralization reform.
According to the plan established by the Committee the decentralization reform road map was made and announced in July, 2003. The major ingredients of the decentralization reform road map was reflected in the "The Decentralization Special Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Special Act") in December, 2003.
The legislation of the Special Act was assessed as a turning point with respect to decentralization reform efforts taken by the Participation Government because the Special Act includes several significant principles with respect to the decentralization reform and major tasks which "a Committee for Promoting Decentralization Reform" is supposed to carry out.
It is more than a year since the legislation of the Special Act was made. Despite of the political and administrative significance of the Special Act it is widely accepted that the output of decentralization reform by the Participation Government has not been produced to an extent which is satisfied.
The purpose of this study is to discuss the significance of the Special Act and to investigate reasons why the output of decentralization reform by the Participation Government has been duly achieved. On the basis of this investigation a few suggestion will be made.
Since the inauguration of the Participation Government whose title was created by president Rho's political intention that he would enhance people's participation in his government sequent measures have been taken in order to carry out his pledges in association with decentralization reform.
An organization named as "Government Innovation and Decentralization Committee (hereinafter referred to as Committee)" was established in April, 2003. One of the major missions of the Committee is to carry out matters with decentralization reform, including planning of and conducting researches associated with decentralization reform.
According to the plan established by the Committee the decentralization reform road map was made and announced in July, 2003. The major ingredients of the decentralization reform road map was reflected in the "The Decentralization Special Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Special Act") in December, 2003.
The legislation of the Special Act was assessed as a turning point with respect to decentralization reform efforts taken by the Participation Government because the Special Act includes several significant principles with respect to the decentralization reform and major tasks which "a Committee for Promoting Decentralization Reform" is supposed to carry out.
It is more than a year since the legislation of the Special Act was made. Despite of the political and administrative significance of the Special Act it is widely accepted that the output of decentralization reform by the Participation Government has not been produced to an extent which is satisfied.
The purpose of this study is to discuss the significance of the Special Act and to investigate reasons why the output of decentralization reform by the Participation Government has been duly achieved. On the basis of this investigation a few suggestion will be made.
목차
〈Abstract〉
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Procedure of the decentralization reform of the Participation Government
Ⅲ. Obstacles to the Decentralization Reform of the Participation Government
Ⅳ. Final Suggestions
Ⅴ. Conclusion
Reference
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
프랑스의 지방분권 개혁
한국사회와 행정연구
2004 .02
-
지방분권 개혁의 단계별 제도적 이슈
한국사회와 행정연구
2004 .05
-
이명박 정부하의 지방분권정책 : 추진과제, 체제 및 전략을 중심으로
한국지방정부학회 학술대회자료집
2008 .09
-
A Comparative Study of Decentralization Reform between Japan and Korea
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2003 .10
-
동북아 자치단체 국제교류
한국지방정부학회 학술대회자료집
2008 .09
-
지방자치단체간 분권연대의 필요성과 가능성 : 대상사업을 중심으로
경기논단
2005 .03
-
이탈리아의 지방분권 및 시사점
경기논단
2004 .09
-
Decentralization Policies in Korea : Problems and Tasks
한국비교정부학보
2007 .01
-
참여정부의 지방분권정책의 공법적 과제
공법학연구
2004 .12
-
참여정부의 지방분권 추진계획(분권 로드맵)의 평가
지방정부연구
2003 .08
-
참여정부의 행정분권법제에 대한 평가- 地方自治의 理念과 地方分權 -
지방자치법연구
2005 .01
-
Health Sector Decentralization and Its Performance : Cross Country Evidence
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2011 .01
-
Did Local Governments Really Become More Efficient after Decentralization?
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2003 .10
-
정부혁신과 지방분권 개혁: : 한ㆍ일간 비교분석
지방정부연구
2004 .05
-
지방분권특별법 및 국가균형발전특별법에 대한 비판적 검토
법과 정책연구
2004 .06
-
Decentralization Policies in Korea : Problems and Tasks
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2007 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-350-016547299