지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, obtaining better understanding of the so-called ‘protectorate (Protecting States, -Etates Protecteurs) stage’, which was one of the steps Japan had taken in their efforts to annex Korea, is pursued.
Japan first made Joseon into a protectorate state before it totally annexed Korea in 1910. Previous studies did not distinguish the state of being a ‘Protected entity’(Etats Proteges), from the state of being a completely colonized country. But there was a reason to Japan’s turning Korea into a ‘protectorate’, and there was a significant difference between the aforementioned both states. At the time, immediate annexation of Korea was not possible for Japan due to its both domestic and foreign reasons. And the Japanese scholars who majored in international laws argued that making Korea a ‘Protectorate’ and managing it in specific fashions would produce results similar to Japan’s annexation of Korea. Before Japan would be able to establish the direction for its Korea policy as full annexation of Korea, they argued that Japan should secure its own interests by running Korea as a protectorate for the time being. Yet factions which supported hard-line policies regarding foreign issues were strongly dissatisfied with the protectorate policy even from the very beginning. They were hearing opinions from hard-liner international law scholars that ‘protectorates’ may well become ‘independent entities’ any time, so they continued their efforts to establish and garner support for the general argument calling for the complete annexation of Korea.
Japan first made Joseon into a protectorate state before it totally annexed Korea in 1910. Previous studies did not distinguish the state of being a ‘Protected entity’(Etats Proteges), from the state of being a completely colonized country. But there was a reason to Japan’s turning Korea into a ‘protectorate’, and there was a significant difference between the aforementioned both states. At the time, immediate annexation of Korea was not possible for Japan due to its both domestic and foreign reasons. And the Japanese scholars who majored in international laws argued that making Korea a ‘Protectorate’ and managing it in specific fashions would produce results similar to Japan’s annexation of Korea. Before Japan would be able to establish the direction for its Korea policy as full annexation of Korea, they argued that Japan should secure its own interests by running Korea as a protectorate for the time being. Yet factions which supported hard-line policies regarding foreign issues were strongly dissatisfied with the protectorate policy even from the very beginning. They were hearing opinions from hard-liner international law scholars that ‘protectorates’ may well become ‘independent entities’ any time, so they continued their efforts to establish and garner support for the general argument calling for the complete annexation of Korea.
목차
머리말
1. 일본 국제법학자들의 ‘보호국’ 입론
2. ‘(피)보호국’ 한국에 대한 인식론
결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
근대 계몽기 한국과 일본 지식인의 ‘보호국론’ 비교 연구
동북아역사논총
2009 .06
-
을사늑약을 전후한 영국의 대한정책
한국사학보
2008 .02
-
Several Present Conditions Defining 100 Years of Japan’s Annexation of Korea
Korea Journal
2010 .12
-
金允植의 外交論에 대한 國際法的 검토
한국인물사연구
2015 .09
-
일제 강제병합 이데올로기와 식민지교육정책
한국독립운동사연구
2011 .08
-
1910년 일본의 조선 병합에 대한 프랑스의 태도
동북아역사논총
2010 .09
-
Discussions Concerning the Legality of the 1910 “Annexation” of Korea by Japan
Korea Journal
2010 .12
-
The Centennial of Japan’s Annexation of Korea : Rethinking Annexation and Postcolonial Legacy
Korea Journal
2010 .12
-
The Russian ‘Diplomatic Revolution’ and Japan’s Annexation of Korea(1905-1910)
International Journal of Korean History
2005 .02
-
일진회의 '보호통치' 인식과 '합방'의 논리
역사와현실
2010 .12
-
The Illegality of the Forced Treaties Leading to Japan`s Annexation of the Great Han Empire : A Discussion of Japan`s Annexation of Korea in Terms of Its Illegality
Korea Journal
1996 .12
-
보호국 및 식민지 초기 일본의 조선교육정책에 대한 일본학계의 연구 경향 : 本間千景, 『韓國「倂合」前後の敎育政策と日本』(佛敎大學硏究叢書, 思文閣出版, 2010)을 중심으로
한국사연구
2010 .12
-
러일협약과 일본의 한국병합
역사학보
2004 .12
-
제2차 헤이그 평화회의(1907)와 대한제국 언론의 세계인식 : 『皇城新聞』과 『大韓每日申報』를 중심으로
한국사학보
2008 .02
-
Korea and Japan
Korea Journal
1967 .08
-
Characteristics of Japan’s Annexation of Korea and the Japanese Colonial System : A Comparison of Korean and Taiwanese Legislation System
Korea Journal
2010 .12
-
통감정치와 재한 일본인
역사교육
2004 .06
-
한국 강제병합 100년과 일본 사회의 동향
동북아역사논총
2011 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-016210236