메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
담화·인지언어학회 담화와인지 담화와인지 제10권 제3호
발행연도
2003.12
수록면
137 - 163 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The principal theoretical aim of the present study is to challenge the widely accepted notion that politeness is a socio-cultural-linguistic universal. The universal theories of politeness claim that clarity and politeness are complementary elements and that diverse politeness phenomena are driven by underlying universal factors, such as non-imposition, optionality and friendliness. In order to re-examine the universality of the politeness rules and strategies, however, we should question whether general concepts of linguistic terms such as face, deference and politeness are universal and whether the constituents of face and face-saving strategies are the same in various cultures. In this paper, it is argued that the components of face, and face-saving strategies are culturally different, and that some behavioural patterns have different meanings in different cultures. Also, it is argued that Brown & Levinson's face threatening acts and face-saving strategies cannot be universal. This paper upholds the assumption that the functions of speech acts can differ according to culture-specific norms and languages.

목차

1. Introduction: General ideas on human interaction and politeness
2. Common ideas in universal politeness theories and critique
3. Different cultural patterns with different meanings
4. Definition of politeness in reference to English and Korean
5. Face-saving strategies as secondary features in Korean politeness
6. Imposition as non-face threatening acts in Korean
7. Concluding remarks
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-701-016224661