지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The principal theoretical aim of the present study is to challenge the widely accepted notion that politeness is a socio-cultural-linguistic universal. The universal theories of politeness claim that clarity and politeness are complementary elements and that diverse politeness phenomena are driven by underlying universal factors, such as non-imposition, optionality and friendliness. In order to re-examine the universality of the politeness rules and strategies, however, we should question whether general concepts of linguistic terms such as face, deference and politeness are universal and whether the constituents of face and face-saving strategies are the same in various cultures. In this paper, it is argued that the components of face, and face-saving strategies are culturally different, and that some behavioural patterns have different meanings in different cultures. Also, it is argued that Brown & Levinson's face threatening acts and face-saving strategies cannot be universal. This paper upholds the assumption that the functions of speech acts can differ according to culture-specific norms and languages.
목차
1. Introduction: General ideas on human interaction and politeness
2. Common ideas in universal politeness theories and critique
3. Different cultural patterns with different meanings
4. Definition of politeness in reference to English and Korean
5. Face-saving strategies as secondary features in Korean politeness
6. Imposition as non-face threatening acts in Korean
7. Concluding remarks
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
정중성의 의미와 쓰임에 관한 연구
영어영문학연구
2009 .01
-
커뮤니케이션에 있어 영어공손표현
영어영문학연구
2005 .01
-
일본어 politeness 연구의 현황과 과제
일어일문학
2013 .05
-
Politeness in Administrative Discourse : Some Perspectives from Two Institutions in Ghana : Your face ... is like a book where men may read strange matters Macbeth, Act 1, Scene V
Journal of Universal Language
2017 .03
-
Politeness in Korea and America : A Comparative Analysis of Request Strategy in English Communication
Korea Journal
2014 .03
-
비교문화 관점에서 본 한미의 언어문화와 공손표현에 대한 탐색
비평문학
2004 .06
-
한국어 화행에서 공손성의 실현 양상
한국어학
2013 .11
-
Politeness in English
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
1998 .10
-
Face, Identities, and Confucian Values In Korean Institutional Discourse
언어과학연구
2013 .12
-
공손성 번역의 적절성에 관한 연구 : 문장종결형에 나타난 공손성을 중심으로
새한영어영문학
2015 .05
-
Constituting Face and Identities in Korean Institutional Discourse
언어과학연구
2012 .12
-
Different politeness strategies in requests affected by experience of studying abroad
영어교과교육
2012 .01
-
A Review of Brown and Levinson's (1987) Politeness Theory
담화와인지
2003 .04
-
A Study on Politeness in English to Korean & Korean to English Translation
새한영어영문학
2010 .11
-
Interpretation of Linguistic Politeness
미래영어영문학회 학술대회 자료집
2013 .06
-
영어와 한국어의 정중성 활용 방안
영어영문학연구
2014 .01
-
Cultural Values, Korean Requests, and Institutional Discourse
언어과학연구
2014 .06
-
Language, Culture and Politeness
코기토
2002 .12
-
The Influence of Computer-mediated Communication on Realizing Politeness Strategies
언어과학연구
2002 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-701-016224661