지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2003.12
- 수록면
- 49 - 71 (23page)
- DOI
- 10.14731/kjis.2003.12.43.5.49
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to present adesirable road map for the upcoming Six-Party Talks, which provide a multilateral forum for resolving the North Korean nuclear maze. For research purposes, this paper first analyzes the U.S. strategic position as it has become the most important variable in determining the characteristics of Six Party Talks. Then, based on this analysis, the paper evaluates the previous Three-Party Talks as well as the current Six-Party Talks and diagnoses the problems of those two multilateral approaches.
At the outcome of the evaluation and diagnosis, this paper concludes that the current Six-Party Talks can further evolve and develop into a better working model by enhancing its multilateral characteristics. To this end, the paper suggests that agendas for negotiation in the Six-Party Talks be perceived and approached in the dimension of comprehensive security. In particular, the paper presents a multilateral cooperative security mechanism as a model for this approach. Such a mechanism should have non-exclusive characteristics and adopt comprehensive security as a negotiation agenda. Although the NEACD (Northeast Asia Cooperation Dialogue) remains a not-so-effective non-government-level mechanism, its accumulated know-how in managing multilateral dialogues would prove useful in building a multilateral cooperative security framework in Northeast Asia.
At the outcome of the evaluation and diagnosis, this paper concludes that the current Six-Party Talks can further evolve and develop into a better working model by enhancing its multilateral characteristics. To this end, the paper suggests that agendas for negotiation in the Six-Party Talks be perceived and approached in the dimension of comprehensive security. In particular, the paper presents a multilateral cooperative security mechanism as a model for this approach. Such a mechanism should have non-exclusive characteristics and adopt comprehensive security as a negotiation agenda. Although the NEACD (Northeast Asia Cooperation Dialogue) remains a not-so-effective non-government-level mechanism, its accumulated know-how in managing multilateral dialogues would prove useful in building a multilateral cooperative security framework in Northeast Asia.
목차
【ABSTRACT】
Ⅰ. Introduction: From Bilateral Format to Multilateral Approaches
Ⅱ. The U.S. Offensive Strategy and Its Effects
Ⅲ. Multilateral Negotiations for Solving the North Korean Nuclear Maze
Ⅳ. In Search of a Solution through Multilateralism
Ⅴ. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
북한 핵문제와 다자주의적 접근의 유용성
국제정치연구
2010 .06
-
China and Multilateral Security Mechanism in Northeast Asia
사회과학연구
2008 .01
-
US PERSPECTIVES ON THE FOUR-PARTY TALKS
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
1997 .01
-
Six-Party Talks: ＂Action for Action＂and the Formalization of Regional Security Cooperation in Northeast Asia
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2007 .01
-
Achieving Peace and Security in Korea and Northeast Asia
국제지역학논총
2008 .12
-
RUSSIA AND FOUR-PARTY TALKS
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
1997 .01
-
동북아 다자안보체제 구축
한반도선진화재단 기타 단행본
2012 .03
-
UNCERTAIN PROSPECTS FOR THE SIX-PARTY TALKS: NORTH KOREA’S NUCLEAR CRISIS AND U.S. POLICY
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2003 .01
-
6자회담의 다자주의 실천성 검증과 다자협력기제로의 발전방안
북한연구학회보
2005 .01
-
DEALING WITH NORTH KOREA: FROM BILATERALISM TO MULTILATERALISM
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2001 .01
-
中国的“负责任的大国”外交与朝核问题
동북아 문화연구
2010 .09
-
북핵 6자회담과 동북아 다자안보협력 구축 전망:쟁점, 제약요인, 과제
세계지역연구논총
2006 .01
-
FOUR-PARTY TALKS AND SOUTH KOREA'S UNIFICATION POLICY
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
1997 .01
-
Global Television and International Diplomacy : CNN's Coverage of the Six-Party Talks
Asian Communication Research
2009 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-349-014727387