메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한복문화학회 한복문화 韓服文化 第11卷 1號
발행연도
2008.4
수록면
23 - 32 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study analysis an objective research on image assessment and preference for Korean design. The data was collected by male and female college students living in Busan and Kyungnam area. At the first trial, 119 data was collected and frequency analysis was used. At the second trial, 263 data were collected and G-sensibility districting analysis, SPSS 10.0 Package for analysis by x2 analysis, descriptive statistics analysis, and dispersion analysis were used. The results of data analysis are as follow First, an Image of Korean design was highly evaluated as modern, natural, elegance, classic, cool-casual, romantic, gorgeous, and dynamic. Second, by analysing the image differences according to the korean design concept, traditional and modern Korean dress had the Images of classic and elegance for the most, but not cool-casual Image. Korean clothes had the Images of natural Image for the most, but not romantic, dynamic, elegance, and gorgeous Images. Korean of motive clothes had the Images of dynamic for the most, but not natural and classic images. Dress style of Korean clothes had the Images of romantic Image. for the most. Third, according to the G-sensibility type regarding gender differences, male was the majority of the respondents of G3(whimsical) type, as then followed by G1(my face) type, Female was the majority of the respondents of G3 type, as then followed by G2(active) type. Fourth, according to the G sensibility type, G2 type and G3 type were highly Interested in korean design while G1 type and G4 type were not. Fifth, a preference for korean design concept was not much different upon G-sensibility type.

목차

〈Abstract〉
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 연구결과
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
사진 출처
참고문헌

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-592-014755040