지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.12
- 수록면
- 95 - 113 (19page)
- DOI
- 10.14731/kjis.2006.12.46.5.95
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Lately countries have concluded many free trade agreements. However, the puzzle scholars face is why so many countries have rushed to enter a free trade agreement. In this study, I ask how and whether domestic institutions of a country make a difference in committing to tariff reduction agreements. I argue that the rush to PTAs since the 1980s is linked to the domestic constraints. I claim that the propensity of signing a trade agreement increases as the survival of political leaders becomes more dependent on having a large size of winning coalition. Decision-makers have greater political motivations to enter international trade agreements as the level of democracy increases as well. This study tests key propositions drawing on a comprehensive database of international trade agreements from 1950 to 1992 with 150 countries. I find that leaders have greater political incentives to conclude international trade agreements as the size of their winning coalition grows. The results also suggest that the level of democracy is associated with a leader's political motivation to conclude international trade agreements. I also find that electoral rule and the number of veto players have an impact on interstate commercial cooperation. By highlighting this dynamic, I demonstrate that domestic institutional constraints deserve more attention in international political economy.
목차
【ABSTRACT】
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Domestic Constraints of External Trade Policy: Argument
Ⅲ. Literature Review
Ⅳ. Variations of Domestic Political Institutions and the Determination to Enter Preferential Trade Agreements
Ⅴ. Research Design and Hypotheses
Ⅵ. Empirical Estimations and Results
Ⅶ. Conclusion
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Korea's Policy on Free Trade Agreements and its Position on an Agreement with Japan
Journal of International Logistics and Trade
2004 .12
-
The Impact of Political Instability on Trade Agreements in Africa
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2017 .01
-
Free Trade Agreements in East Asian Countries: What Has Been Done and What Needs to Be Done?
[KIEP] East Asian Economic Review
2005 .06
-
디지털무역 자유화를 위한 지역무역협정의 성과와 과제
무역연구
2019 .01
-
자유무역협정의 확산에 대응한 농촌 활성화 방안에 관한 연구
무역연구
2010 .01
-
Long-run Effects of the Korea-China Free-Trade Agreement
[KIEP] East Asian Economic Review
2015 .06
-
The Impact of Logistics Efficiency and Free Trade Agreements on Global Trade : Focusing on Total Trade Value
Journal of International Logistics and Trade
2016 .12
-
A Study on the Determinants of Free Trade Agreement in South Korea: Evidence from Asian Countries
유통과학연구
2018 .01
-
THE POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS OF KOREA-CHINA FTA NEGOTIATIONS
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2008 .12
-
Characteristics and Problems of Free Trade Agreements Involving East Asian Countries
Journal of International Logistics and Trade
2004 .12
-
한국의 선택 : 한ㆍ미 자유무역협정 체결의 선결조건
관세학회지
2006 .02
-
국제무역협정이 수출에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2007 .12
-
Democracy, Does It Affect Trade Liberalization?
한국무역학회 학술대회
2003 .05
-
무역구조 및 관세율 변동의 무역창출효과 분석
관세학회지
2009 .05
-
The Impact of Free Trade Agreements on Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Korea
[KIEP] East Asian Economic Review
2013 .12
-
A Political Economy Approach to the forthcoming Korea-EU Free Trade Agreement
인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 학술대회
2007 .10
-
Exploring the Possibility for a U.S.-Korea FTA
Journal of International Logistics and Trade
2005 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-349-014769787