지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
While works on pronominal anaphora resolution are well established, and there have been considerable works on the definite noun phrase anaphora, Associative Anaphora which by an entity can be referred to by a definite referring expression without previously being mentioned in the text. It is realized in text as an (definite)NP in Korean, and its referent is implicitly associated with previously introduced NP.
But this paper deals with the phenomenon known as Associative Anaphora in a critical perspective. Embedded into the variable categories developed in Kim Kwanghee(1997), the establishment of associative anaphora is unreasonable. Some reasons are as follows:
First, so called associative NP, anaphora, is a constant entity not variable one. Therefore, associative NP is introduce new informations into a textual situation. It is the point of difference between co-referential anaphora which leads old informations and associative anaphora. Second, a associative NP must be supported by an accessible precedence NP. Problems are arise here. The lexical lists derived by association are different depending on speakers and hearers. In this case the context may offer several pairs of ‘NP-NP’ candidates for the role of antecedent and associative anaphora. So there may be no consistency.
We reach the conclusion from these several observations that associative anaphora must be treated as associative inference or associative collocation not as anaphora.
But this paper deals with the phenomenon known as Associative Anaphora in a critical perspective. Embedded into the variable categories developed in Kim Kwanghee(1997), the establishment of associative anaphora is unreasonable. Some reasons are as follows:
First, so called associative NP, anaphora, is a constant entity not variable one. Therefore, associative NP is introduce new informations into a textual situation. It is the point of difference between co-referential anaphora which leads old informations and associative anaphora. Second, a associative NP must be supported by an accessible precedence NP. Problems are arise here. The lexical lists derived by association are different depending on speakers and hearers. In this case the context may offer several pairs of ‘NP-NP’ candidates for the role of antecedent and associative anaphora. So there may be no consistency.
We reach the conclusion from these several observations that associative anaphora must be treated as associative inference or associative collocation not as anaphora.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 조응의 개념과 그 문법적 동기
3. 연상조응사 설정의 이론적 정합성
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Zero Anaphora in Korean
언어
1979 .12
-
Do So is Shallow
생성문법연구
2010 .01
-
Toward a Functional Theory of Anaphora
어학연구
1978 .12
-
ON THE TYPOLOGY OF ZERO ANAPHORA
어학연구
1984 .06
-
THE SYNTAX OF KOREAN ANAPHORA
어학연구
1984 .06
-
On the Understood Object in English
생성문법연구
2014 .01
-
Anaphora Resolution Strategies in L2 Reading
영어학
2018 .12
-
Pronominal Anaphora in Korea
어학연구
1978 .06
-
Zero Anaphora in Spoken and Written Discourse
담화와인지
1998 .06
-
조응에서 ‘연상’과 ‘추론’의 대위적 상관성
어학연구
2016 .12
-
Preferred Interpretations of Anaphora
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2004 .04
-
러시아어 대용어(Anaphora)의 국부 영역(Local Domain)에 대하여
슬라브학보
2002 .12
-
Topicality in Anaphora
언어
1980 .06
-
A Minimalist Approach to English Anaphora
언어
1994 .12
-
Syntactic Prominence in Anaphora
언어
1980 .06
-
韓漢“零形回指”對照分析
중국어문학논집
2016 .10
-
한국어 영형 대용의 해결과 최적성 이론
담화와인지
2004 .12
-
대용화의 논리 형태
성곡논총
1990 .08
-
A Pragmatic Alternative to Syntactic Accounts of Anaphora
담화와인지
2003 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-710-014842615