메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2008년 가을호(통권 84호)
발행연도
2008.8
수록면
129 - 160 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The state must maintain itself as a clean entity of power only restricted by the consciousness and interest of the community members, in a socially stabilized environment that supports democratization. With such precondition established, it should also endeavor to the best of its constitutional abilities, to construct a stable national economy. In dealing with foreign matters, domestic opinions should all be collected, and foreign policies should reflect the identity of the nation and its sovereign power. And it is imperative that the state play such role, for the market to operate freely and prosper with its own rules. Our constitution itself dictates so as well.
The argument that the 'market would provide everything', which is again based upon the notion that 'the strong will survive and the weak will perish', will only breed conflicted development of the economy, accelerate disproportionate distribution of wealth and the advent of social polarization. It will ultimately bring about a situation in which not only the market but also the Capitalist economy structure would not survive. On the other hand, the suggestion of a national economy for the Korean people of the 21st century would strive for two things: constructing an economic community including both South and North, to serve the cause of establishing a peaceful relationship between them, while also aiming for a 'harmonious Capitalism' based upon a philosophy viewing development & profit and welfare & distribution as concepts ill a complementing relationship and not in a conflicting relationship. In other words, only a socially established philosophy of 'harmonious Capitalism' and its related policies, based upon full-scale democratization, could ultimately enhance the productivity of the national economy, and construct the frame for a democratic economy development.

목차

1. 시장만능론의 폭풍, 국민경제와 민주화의 위기
2. 잊혀진 비판 논리를 재검토해야 하는 이유
3. 시장의 신화, 그리고 잘못된 이해
4. 헌법이 규정한 민주적 경제질서와 국가의 역할
5. 민족경제론의 문제의식과 현재적 의의
6. 맺음말-한국사회의 위기와 국가의 역할

참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-905-015076594