지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In English, there exist so-called complex predicates in the form of a light verb (have, give, make, do, take, etc.) + a predicational deverbal noun along with its corresponding simple verb. Even though the predicates are widely in use, a systematic study of their properties and use has not been successfully carried out yet and thus the predicates still deserve scrutiny.
Given that the light verb predicates have room to be examined, this paper first explores their morphological, syntactic, and semantic properties. It suggests that the subject of the complex predicates is subject to the selectional restrictions imposed on that of the corresponding simple verbs; their predicational nominals are identical to the simple verbs in form, retaining the (in)transitivity of the verbs, and taking an adjective modifier; the meaning of the predicates is analogous to that of the simple verbs.
The paper then investigates the semantic characteristics of the complex predicates whose light verb is have, give, and take. It reveals the following facts. First, [have a deverbal N] describes an aimless voluntary activity of the [+agent] human subject and his or her involvement in a certain activity for a short period for his or her own enjoyment or relief. It also implies the repetition of and the absence of a time or space limitation on the activity being performed. Second, when taking an indirect object, [give a deverbal N] refers to an action or an activity intentionally carried out by the subject, emphasizes the impact on the indirect object, and shows a single performance of an action or an activity, whereas when lacking an indirect object, it may relate to a spontaneous or involuntary action or activity on the part of the (non-)human subject. Third, [take a deverbal N] expresses a voluntary or preplanned activity, relates to the subject's physical efforts, and refers to a single unit of activity that is being completed.
Given that the light verb predicates have room to be examined, this paper first explores their morphological, syntactic, and semantic properties. It suggests that the subject of the complex predicates is subject to the selectional restrictions imposed on that of the corresponding simple verbs; their predicational nominals are identical to the simple verbs in form, retaining the (in)transitivity of the verbs, and taking an adjective modifier; the meaning of the predicates is analogous to that of the simple verbs.
The paper then investigates the semantic characteristics of the complex predicates whose light verb is have, give, and take. It reveals the following facts. First, [have a deverbal N] describes an aimless voluntary activity of the [+agent] human subject and his or her involvement in a certain activity for a short period for his or her own enjoyment or relief. It also implies the repetition of and the absence of a time or space limitation on the activity being performed. Second, when taking an indirect object, [give a deverbal N] refers to an action or an activity intentionally carried out by the subject, emphasizes the impact on the indirect object, and shows a single performance of an action or an activity, whereas when lacking an indirect object, it may relate to a spontaneous or involuntary action or activity on the part of the (non-)human subject. Third, [take a deverbal N] expresses a voluntary or preplanned activity, relates to the subject's physical efforts, and refers to a single unit of activity that is being completed.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 복합술어구문의 본질
Ⅲ. 복합술어구문의 의미적 특성
Ⅳ. 맺음말
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
통제이론 하의 복합 술어 (Ⅰ)
중국어문논역총간
2000 .12
-
통제이론 하의 복합 술어(Ⅱ)
중국어문논역총간
2001 .06
-
[우리 말 학습과 연구]명사적술어에 나타나는 《-이》에 대한 연구
중국조선어문
1991 .05
-
현대한어 NP1{NP2+...(NPn+VP)} 구문에서 ‘NP1’과 술어의 관계
한국중국어교육학회 학술대회
2005 .11
-
술어의 구성소
국어교육연구
1981 .12
-
명사술어와 그 상관성분
중국조선어문
1985 .12
-
러시아어 수사구문의 술어 수일치에 관한 의미-통사적 연구
동유럽발칸연구
2008 .01
-
접속술어에 대하여
중국조선어문
1985 .12
-
술어 명사의 의미 구조
언어학
2002 .04
-
형식명사 술어 구문의 문법화 현상
담화와인지
1998 .12
-
러시아어 감정술어의 의미와 통사적 결합가의 상관관계
러시아어문학연구논집
2010 .01
-
주어와 술어를 바로 맞물리자
중국조선어문
1989 .02
-
영어와 한국어 삼항 술어 구문 비교 분석
언어과학
2009 .01
-
Secondary Predicates
언어과학
2006 .01
-
조동사 복합술어 구문 분석 및 전산학적 구현
어학연구
2004 .03
-
Secondary Predicates and Its Distribution
언어과학
2008 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0