메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기독교역사연구소 한국기독교와 역사 한국기독교와 역사 제19호
발행연도
2003.8
수록면
31 - 76 (48page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
One of the most controversial figures in the Korean church history might be Rev. Samuel Forest Moore(1860~1906), who worked in Seoul ever since his arrival there in September, 1892. When he died in December of 1906, missionaries praised his beautiful personal character and his evangelistic works. The Koreans called him “benevolent pastor” and his church and school as “the houses of love, righteousness, and propriety.” By contrast, in 1908, Dr. H. N. Allen accused Moore as an exceptional missionary crank, who smashed the little plaster idols with his cane at a Buddhist temple, and wrote “a letter to the Emperor calling upon him to repent of his sins and asking to be allowed to preach repentance to him.” In 1944 Dr. F. H. Harrington added that such a person was likely to create an anti-Christian reaction. And this was 1900, the Boxer year. The Tong Hak might rise again in Chosen, with a program of opposition to Christianity. Allen himself threatened to imprison the impulsive missionary in the legation jail. Since the criticism of Allen and Harrington, most Korean church historians, including Dr. Min Kyeongbae, portrayed Moore as a typical turn-of-the-nineteenth-century conservative American Presbyterian missionary whose triumphalism and iconoclasm destroyed Korean religious culture without courtesy. This paper aims to examine and reconstruct the narratives of the Moore’s incidents based on the primary sources. It deconstructs the interpretations of Allen, Harrington, and Min, whose biased views dominated in the writings of the Korean church history for a century. The second purpose of this paper is to see the evolution of Moore’s evangelical mission theology in general. An analysis of his so-called fundamentalistic mission theory reveals that the first American Presbyterian missionaries to Korea were mostly not such ultra-conservatives but evangelicals who combined the evangelistic zeal with socio-political reformation and intolerance with adaptation to Korean religions. The combination of indigenization and Christian civilization was the main features of their mission theology. Its third purpose is to find the legacy of Moore’s incidents and his mission theory. This paper challenges the contemporary so-called orthodox conservative groups who believe that they preserve the first-generation American missionaries evangelical theological legacy in their attitudes towards politics and non-Christian religions in Korea.

목차

1. 머리말
2. 기존 서술의 해체
3. 사건의 재구성
4. 무어의 선교 신학
5. 맺음말
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0