지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Local Residents' Referendum Act enacted in 2004 provides a "Residents' Referendum on the Issue of National Policy" as a method of public consultation about policy issues with which local residents have great concern like any alteration, abolition, establishment, division or consolidation of local governments. alteration of the jurisdictions of local government or site selection for important facilities. Recently such a referendum was used in two important cases: the consolidation of four local jurisdictions at Jeju Island into one Special District and the site selection of middle and low-level radioactive waste disposal facility.
The referendum about national policy can be seen as one of the procedural elements at the administrative decision-making process. This kind of referendum has no binding force on the decision of administrative agency of central government, but due to the special character of referendum as a procedure of direct democracy, it can be abused by central government to justify its own decision and evade the responsibility for it. It could also harm the value of deliberation in the representative democracy. Therefore, the use of it should be legally regulated specially to make sure that central governments demarcate voting district reasonably and the undue influence of local government or public officials in the voting campaign be excluded.
But at present there are few legal regulations about when and how to use the referendum and it depends on the central government's full discretion. The provisions about voting campaign and appeal procedure of the Local Residents' Referendum do not apply in case of the referendum for national policy. And there are barriers of standing or timing to the availability of judicial review over the final decision after the referendum. Though it will not be easy to argue the causal relationship between the illegal referendum and the final decision for it doesn't have any official binding force, the appeal litigation against the final decision based on the procedural illegality of referendum would be a possible appeal procedure. But it will be more effective to enact detailed statutory standards regulating the use of referendum for national policy.
The referendum about national policy can be seen as one of the procedural elements at the administrative decision-making process. This kind of referendum has no binding force on the decision of administrative agency of central government, but due to the special character of referendum as a procedure of direct democracy, it can be abused by central government to justify its own decision and evade the responsibility for it. It could also harm the value of deliberation in the representative democracy. Therefore, the use of it should be legally regulated specially to make sure that central governments demarcate voting district reasonably and the undue influence of local government or public officials in the voting campaign be excluded.
But at present there are few legal regulations about when and how to use the referendum and it depends on the central government's full discretion. The provisions about voting campaign and appeal procedure of the Local Residents' Referendum do not apply in case of the referendum for national policy. And there are barriers of standing or timing to the availability of judicial review over the final decision after the referendum. Though it will not be easy to argue the causal relationship between the illegal referendum and the final decision for it doesn't have any official binding force, the appeal litigation against the final decision based on the procedural illegality of referendum would be a possible appeal procedure. But it will be more effective to enact detailed statutory standards regulating the use of referendum for national policy.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 행정의사결정과정에 대한 법적 규율
Ⅲ. 국가정책에 관한 주민투표의 의의
Ⅳ. 국가정책에 관한 주민투표의 법적 규율
Ⅴ. 맺음말
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
제주도 주민투표 사례에 관한 연구
한국사회와 행정연구
2005 .11
-
국가정책 주민투표제도에 관한 헌법정책론 : 참여․숙의민주주의 이론을 중심으로
공법학연구
2017 .08
-
주민투표의 숙의적 참여수준과원자력 갈등관리 효력에 관한 분석
한국비교정부학보
2016 .01
-
주민투표제도에 관한 헌법적 검토
공법학연구
2019 .08
-
Parties and Direct Democracy : The Relationship between Evaluation on Parties’ Performance and Supporting Referendum
한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집
2016 .12
-
중심에 대한 주변의 항의로서의 민간주도형 주민투표 : 삼척·영덕·기장의 원전관련 주민투표를 중심으로
환경사회학연구 ECO
2017 .12
-
주민투표제도에 관한 사례연구- 평은면 주민투표를 중심으로-
정책개발연구
2015 .01
-
The Aftermath of the Brexit Referendum: Political and Economic Impact in the UK
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2016 .10
-
갈등해소 기제로서의 주민투표제도 개선방안 연구 : 숙의 민주주의적 요소를 중심으로
한국정책과학학회보
2013 .09
-
스코틀랜드 민족당 (SNP)의 독립 요구 분석 : 긴축재정과 중앙정부의 전략적 합의를 중심으로
유럽연구
2016 .06
-
‘주민투표’는 환경갈등 해결의 대안인가? : 방사성폐기물처리장 주민투표 평가
경제와사회
2007 .09
-
기초자치단체의 통폐합과 관련된 법해석상의 쟁점들의 검토
지방자치법연구
2009 .01
-
주민참여제의 문제점, 그리고 발전 방안
시민사회와 NGO
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0