지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The U.S.A had negative understanding of Korea since the late 19th century. The negative understanding was that Korea couldn't reform and develop herself without the support and protection of outside world, not only because she didn't have sufficient capacity for self-government due to injustice, inefficiency, corruption and stagnation, but because she was located at the special geopolitical environment, having been a field of battle among China, Russia, and Japan. On the basis of this understanding, the U.S.A officially recognized Japanese aggression and ruling of Korea, and estimated that Japanese ruling contributed to the modernization of the Korean society. Also, the identical result of the negative understanding was applied to Korea before and after liberation from Japan(1945). The U.S.A thought that Korea should be placed under the international trusteeship for the peace of the north-eastern Asia before becoming an independent state because she didn't have sufficient capacity for self-government and was located at the center of conflict among the world powers. Therefore, the writer of this article thinks the American understanding of Korea is logically based on the theory of modernization which has to do with the viewpoint that Korea was stagnant and could be developed only by the support of outside world.
But the U.S.A criticized that Japanese Imperialism could fail to realize the desired end because the ruling ways were wrong. According to the judgement of the U.S.A, Japan restricted the Korean people's participation in government, and deepened the discrimination and inequality between Koreans and Japanese through the Japan-and Japanese-oriented policies, and tried unreasonably to obliterate the nationality of Korea. Though this understanding was only sometimes brought up by American missionaries or diplomats as long as the friendly relation between the U.S.A and Japan was kept, it became the America's dominant viewpoint when the relation between the U.S.A and Japan changed from friendship to hostility because of the break of the Pacific War. In other words, the U.S.A concluded that Japan didn't properly accomplished the mission to reform and civilize Korea, though she recognized Japanese responsibility for it. According to the American observation, Japanese ruling was one of the harshest tyranny to be seen in modern times and Koreans were degraded to the condition of slavery. The writer of this article think that America's conclusion can be a watershed in that the U.S.A could criticize Japanese ruling over Korea though it was based on the theory of modernization. In this point, the logic of the America's observation of Korea was composed of binary strata called the theory of self-governmental colonialism on the basis of the theory of modernization.
In brief, the times of colonial Korea which was described in the American observation were not only a barbaric age but the age in which Korean potential power of development grew at the same time. Though the U.S.A criticized that Japanese ruling was a tyranny, she judged that the fruits of Korea's self-development, the legacy of Japanese colonial development, Korea's overseas manpower improving leaders of independence movement, and Korean people's strong national identity oriented toward ani-Japanese independence contributed to the growth of its potential power under the Japanese ruling and to the formation of its capacity for self-government after liberation from Japan(1945). The writer of this article thinks that this is the important point which is different from the theory of colony-exploitation by Japanese imperialism or the theory of colony-modernization.
But the U.S.A criticized that Japanese Imperialism could fail to realize the desired end because the ruling ways were wrong. According to the judgement of the U.S.A, Japan restricted the Korean people's participation in government, and deepened the discrimination and inequality between Koreans and Japanese through the Japan-and Japanese-oriented policies, and tried unreasonably to obliterate the nationality of Korea. Though this understanding was only sometimes brought up by American missionaries or diplomats as long as the friendly relation between the U.S.A and Japan was kept, it became the America's dominant viewpoint when the relation between the U.S.A and Japan changed from friendship to hostility because of the break of the Pacific War. In other words, the U.S.A concluded that Japan didn't properly accomplished the mission to reform and civilize Korea, though she recognized Japanese responsibility for it. According to the American observation, Japanese ruling was one of the harshest tyranny to be seen in modern times and Koreans were degraded to the condition of slavery. The writer of this article think that America's conclusion can be a watershed in that the U.S.A could criticize Japanese ruling over Korea though it was based on the theory of modernization. In this point, the logic of the America's observation of Korea was composed of binary strata called the theory of self-governmental colonialism on the basis of the theory of modernization.
In brief, the times of colonial Korea which was described in the American observation were not only a barbaric age but the age in which Korean potential power of development grew at the same time. Though the U.S.A criticized that Japanese ruling was a tyranny, she judged that the fruits of Korea's self-development, the legacy of Japanese colonial development, Korea's overseas manpower improving leaders of independence movement, and Korean people's strong national identity oriented toward ani-Japanese independence contributed to the growth of its potential power under the Japanese ruling and to the formation of its capacity for self-government after liberation from Japan(1945). The writer of this article thinks that this is the important point which is different from the theory of colony-exploitation by Japanese imperialism or the theory of colony-modernization.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 일제의 행정개혁과 정치참여 제한
Ⅲ. 일제의 경제개발과 수탈
Ⅳ. 일제의 교육진보와 민족성 말살 기도
Ⅴ. 한인의 반일독립의식과 저항운동
Ⅵ. 식민지 유산-자치역량 부족과 국제신탁통치 필요성-
Ⅶ. 결론-식민지 근대화 논쟁에 부쳐-
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Japanese Studies in Korea
Korea Journal
1965 .06
-
韓日兩國의 歷史認識問題
사학연구
2003 .12
-
스즈키 다케오(鈴木武雄)의 식민지조선근대화론
韓國史學史學報
2014 .01
-
일제 식민지 근대화론 문제 검토
한국독립운동사연구
1997 .12
-
일제 강제병합 이데올로기와 식민지교육정책
한국독립운동사연구
2011 .08
-
한일협정 후 한국 지식인의 일본 인식
동북아역사논총
2011 .09
-
러일전쟁 이후 일본의 한국식민론과 식민주의적 문명론
동양사학연구
2006 .03
-
대한제국기 일본 유학생들의 유학생활과 유학의식 : 1900년대 일본유학생들의 ‘일본론’을 중심으로
역사와실학
2015 .08
-
근대경제에 대한 한국인의 적응 : 19세기 후반부터 20세기 전반까지
역사학보
2009 .06
-
『국민문학』의 일본인 작가와 식민지 표상
우리말글
2011 .12
-
해방 직전 미주 한인의 독립운동과 미국 정부의 대응
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2002 .09
-
번역과 한국 및 일본의 근대화(번역제반 양상의 비교)
번역학연구
2007 .09
-
Korea and Japan During the Russo-Japanese War-With a Special Focus on the Japanese Occupation Forces in Korea
International Journal of Korean History
2005 .02
-
Study of Japanese History in Korea
Korea Journal
1985 .12
-
19세기 말 영국 지식인과 동아시아 - 유럽중심적 시각의 층위 -
대구사학
2009 .01
-
한국 역사 교과서인가, 아니면 일본 역사 교과서인가? : 교학사 한국사 교과서 일제강점기 서술 비판
역사비평
2013 .11
-
김달수의 단편소설에 나타난 민족주의 고찰 : 『사간동 57번지』와『참외와 황제』를 중심으로
일어일문학
2017 .05
-
일제강점기 한국인의 식민지 체험과 새로운 근대 기획
역사비평
2010 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018333107