지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Relating to this academic conference, author tried to revealthe corruption situations in Chosun dynasty through Yangban(Aristocratic Class in Chosun Dynasty) official's way operating economy. From current view, there are many illegal, unreasonable aspects in Yangban officials' economic lives in 16C. Request for a official position through presenting gifts were common in their lives at that time. And taking advantage of their own position as governmental official, they cultivated some garrison farmor participated in the process of paying tribute to king(it was called as Bangnap in Korean). Although the latter has strong negative image, gift economy is understood as economy-operating way of premodern society.
Characteristics of economic system in premodern society lie in unstable and unclear ones. Modern national economy, finance has been developed toward clear distinction of public and private affairs, and in collection taxes, the only public collect secures legitimacy. Private collection or private spending taxes is the problem directly linking to bribe or embezzlement. National economy of premodern society, however is characterized that the distinction between public and private affairs is vague. Therefore, we are hard to absolutely think all considered not being public as corruptions.
So, we need to examine the operation process of financial source from local finance operating system in Chosun society. Chosun, of course, as rare case, had suggested the ideas to clarify the distinction of public and private affairs from its establishment. The nation founders terminated the hereditary estate law andeliminated the grant of individual's privilege receiving tax from cultivating farmers. They had ideological frame which nation collects all financial resources and appropriately distribute them to people, and we can find the course realizing the goal. But, the idea eventually failed to make format with its original meaning.The gift economy examined until now is commonly considered as private section. But it is the sign that public affairs and private ones were not divided in Chosun's national finance. Unique operation principle of gift economy needs to be understood in Chosun times. At that time, local finance was mainly based on non-regular finance section, and gift is directly related to this problem.
It can be said that Yangban(aristocratic) officials' behaviors presenting and receiving gifts in 16C was very universal economic system. The gift type by medium of official position has characteristics that local official unilaterally presents to Yangban officials and draws necessary financial resource out of the local office he governs. As nation takes some parts in gift presentation, gift can be said to be a part of national redistribution system. These Yangban(aristocratic) officials used gifts in exclusively enjoying them with their governmental authorities and in solidifying their unity. However, these behaviors of gift presentation eventually run out their lives along with the loss of an individual's influence. But the gift type presenting among relatives or friends still remain with us,
Then how this gift-presenting behavior was appeared in the latter term of Chosun dynasty? Author is continually interested in that part, but have not found any related data. Author think it is dangerous to hastily conclude some periodic changes through only a few cases. But I hope the appearance of important data equalable to 'Mookjae's Diary or 'Miam's Diary' in 16C.
Characteristics of economic system in premodern society lie in unstable and unclear ones. Modern national economy, finance has been developed toward clear distinction of public and private affairs, and in collection taxes, the only public collect secures legitimacy. Private collection or private spending taxes is the problem directly linking to bribe or embezzlement. National economy of premodern society, however is characterized that the distinction between public and private affairs is vague. Therefore, we are hard to absolutely think all considered not being public as corruptions.
So, we need to examine the operation process of financial source from local finance operating system in Chosun society. Chosun, of course, as rare case, had suggested the ideas to clarify the distinction of public and private affairs from its establishment. The nation founders terminated the hereditary estate law andeliminated the grant of individual's privilege receiving tax from cultivating farmers. They had ideological frame which nation collects all financial resources and appropriately distribute them to people, and we can find the course realizing the goal. But, the idea eventually failed to make format with its original meaning.The gift economy examined until now is commonly considered as private section. But it is the sign that public affairs and private ones were not divided in Chosun's national finance. Unique operation principle of gift economy needs to be understood in Chosun times. At that time, local finance was mainly based on non-regular finance section, and gift is directly related to this problem.
It can be said that Yangban(aristocratic) officials' behaviors presenting and receiving gifts in 16C was very universal economic system. The gift type by medium of official position has characteristics that local official unilaterally presents to Yangban officials and draws necessary financial resource out of the local office he governs. As nation takes some parts in gift presentation, gift can be said to be a part of national redistribution system. These Yangban(aristocratic) officials used gifts in exclusively enjoying them with their governmental authorities and in solidifying their unity. However, these behaviors of gift presentation eventually run out their lives along with the loss of an individual's influence. But the gift type presenting among relatives or friends still remain with us,
Then how this gift-presenting behavior was appeared in the latter term of Chosun dynasty? Author is continually interested in that part, but have not found any related data. Author think it is dangerous to hastily conclude some periodic changes through only a few cases. But I hope the appearance of important data equalable to 'Mookjae's Diary or 'Miam's Diary' in 16C.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 자료와 가계
Ⅲ. 선물의 분류방식과 종류
Ⅳ. 선물의 실태와 규모
Ⅴ. 맺음말에 대신하여?선물의 사회경제적 성격
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Gifts
Korea Journal
1972 .03
-
The Final Gift
Korea Journal
1988 .12
-
16세기 양반관료의 선물관행과 경제적 성격
역사와현실
2009 .03
-
비 존재론적 신학 담론으로서의 증여에 대한 이해 : 증여의 상호성과 대상성 논쟁을 중심으로
신학논단
2010 .09
-
초월의 몸짓 : 라캉과 데리다
현대정신분석
1999 .12
-
증여론과 증여의 윤리
비교문화연구
2005 .01
-
The Gifts of the Spirit for the Church
신학정론
2010 .11
-
성령 은사의 본질과 속성에 관한 연구
한국조직신학논총
2010 .01
-
가치의 위기와 모스의 선물: 데이비드 그레이버(David Graeber)의 가치 이론을 중심으로
인문언어
2015 .01
-
증여와 사회/공동체: 이론적 접합의 모색
비교문화연구
2020 .06
-
칼뱅의 선물 사상에 대한 고찰
한국기독교신학논총
2020 .01
-
은사에 대한 오해와 바람직한 은사의 사용
한국기독교신학논총
2009 .07
-
A Biblical Basis of Spiritual Gift in Contemporary Church Growth
한국기독교신학논총
2005 .05
-
데리다의 증여이론
대동철학
2016 .01
-
선물과 이름 : ‘근본적인 인정 행위’로서의 증여
비교문화연구
2016 .01
-
외교와 경제 : 조선후기 통신사외교와 경제시스템 : 通信使 禮單을 통해서 본 朝日外交의 특징과 그 변화
한일관계사연구
2007 .04
-
증여와 해체- 데리다의 증여개념을 중심으로
동서철학연구
2020 .01
-
Male Bonding and Reciprocity in Words in Anne Brontë’s The Tenant of Wildfell Hall
영미문학페미니즘
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018332620