지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2001.3
- 수록면
- 25 - 46 (22page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The first-ever Korean summit in June 2000 was a remarkable event. Not only did the two heads of state sign a joint declaration, but the leaders repeatedly insisted that it would be implemented. Noticeably absent from the joint statement, however, was any mention of the need how to ease military tension and build a durable peace on the peninsula. Such issues were apparently raised by President Kim Dae-jung, but nothing was agreed.
In October 2000 following the inter-Korean rapprochement, Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright met with the North Korean Chairman Kim Jong-il to discuss state-sponsored terrorism and missile testing and export issues. The meeting appeared fruitful, but it will likely take time and require a de facto "reward" to North Korea. There was also a joint communique before the visit on the need for steps replacing the 1953 Armistice Agreement with permanent peace arrangements.
Despite the breakthrough achieved at the inter-Korean summit and the follow-up talks, the omission of conventional-warfare security issues should be a major concern-especially to South Korea. We should not forget North Korea's formidable conventional military threat to South Korea.
Therefore, we need to address conventional security issues at the next inter-Korean summit without any reservation. Seoul's and Washington's engagement policy thus far has been a step-by-step approach starting from talking about political and economic issues, with security issues presumably coming up eventually. With the advent of George W. Bush Administration in Washington, its approach toward North Korea will change entirely, because President Bush and his secretaries frequently emphasized the need for being "tough" on North Korea's military threats-conventional and unconventional alike. At the same time, South Korean government reexamines the achievements and future approach toward North Korea in light of changes in domestic economic performance, public opinion, and US administration.
This paper proposes a more ambitious, holistic and adaptive approach. It is based on the belief that for the engagement policy of Seoul and Washington to be sustainable and productive, it should include concrete steps now to reduce conventional military threats on the Korean Peninsula and build a peacefully coexisting Korean Peninsula. Simultaneous political, economic, and security negotiations would have the best chance of inducing the desired behavioral changes in the North. All security issues could be addressed in a single forum except for the US missile deal with North Korea.
The English paper was originally published in the December 2000 issue of Arms Control Today under the title of "Time for Conventional Arms Control on the Korean Peninsula. Later, the author rewrote in Korean with substantial adjustment to the new situations in and around Korea. The Korean paper recommends South Korea's genuine approach to the conventional arms control issue from a holistic perspective with more effective strategy than ever.
In October 2000 following the inter-Korean rapprochement, Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright met with the North Korean Chairman Kim Jong-il to discuss state-sponsored terrorism and missile testing and export issues. The meeting appeared fruitful, but it will likely take time and require a de facto "reward" to North Korea. There was also a joint communique before the visit on the need for steps replacing the 1953 Armistice Agreement with permanent peace arrangements.
Despite the breakthrough achieved at the inter-Korean summit and the follow-up talks, the omission of conventional-warfare security issues should be a major concern-especially to South Korea. We should not forget North Korea's formidable conventional military threat to South Korea.
Therefore, we need to address conventional security issues at the next inter-Korean summit without any reservation. Seoul's and Washington's engagement policy thus far has been a step-by-step approach starting from talking about political and economic issues, with security issues presumably coming up eventually. With the advent of George W. Bush Administration in Washington, its approach toward North Korea will change entirely, because President Bush and his secretaries frequently emphasized the need for being "tough" on North Korea's military threats-conventional and unconventional alike. At the same time, South Korean government reexamines the achievements and future approach toward North Korea in light of changes in domestic economic performance, public opinion, and US administration.
This paper proposes a more ambitious, holistic and adaptive approach. It is based on the belief that for the engagement policy of Seoul and Washington to be sustainable and productive, it should include concrete steps now to reduce conventional military threats on the Korean Peninsula and build a peacefully coexisting Korean Peninsula. Simultaneous political, economic, and security negotiations would have the best chance of inducing the desired behavioral changes in the North. All security issues could be addressed in a single forum except for the US missile deal with North Korea.
The English paper was originally published in the December 2000 issue of Arms Control Today under the title of "Time for Conventional Arms Control on the Korean Peninsula. Later, the author rewrote in Korean with substantial adjustment to the new situations in and around Korea. The Korean paper recommends South Korea's genuine approach to the conventional arms control issue from a holistic perspective with more effective strategy than ever.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 과거의 군비통제회담
3. 군비통제의 원칙과 목적
4. 결론
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Change of North Korea and the Security of the Korean Peninsula
사회과학연구
1996 .12
-
북한의 ‘민족공조’론과 남북관계 10년 : 평가와 전망
통일정책연구
2004 .01
-
한반도 군비통제와 평화구축: 9.19 남북 군사합의서를 중심으로
Journal of North Korea Studies
2019 .01
-
Arms Control Proposals of North and South Korea and Their Implications for Korean Security
국제정치논총
1986 .12
-
South Korea-North Korea-Russia Trilateral Cooperation for Peace and Prosperity on the Korean Peninsula
[KIEP] 단행본
2018 .09
-
북한 개별관광의 유엔(UN) 안전보장이사회 대북제재 위반 여부와 추진방안
호텔리조트연구
2020 .01
-
North Korea’s South Korea Policy: An Evaluation of Determining Variables and Prospects for 2012
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2011 .01
-
한반도 안보문제에 대한 군비통제적 접근 : 이론, 평가, 전망
국제정치논총
2009 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-350-018350943