지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.3
- 수록면
- 111 - 139 (29page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Recently, the South Korean government has been showing its strong willingness to take the lead in the economic integration of East Asia. However, the South Korean government would need to have various kinds of capacities for the job. This article stresses the importance of these capacities on the part of the South Korean government, especially in the arena of domestic politics (as opposed to international politics). Domestic political capacities, which are necessary for the government to carry the integration policy forward, can be summarized as the capacity to successfully pursue the structural adjustment of existing governmental policies and the capacity to create and successfully pursue compensation policies that are necessary for increased economic integration. Structural adjustment and the derivative losses of certain socio? economic groups in each participating nation are unavoidable in the process of regional economic integration. Therefore, in the process of enforcing structural adjustment in its policies, each government should not neglect to supply the losers with appropriate and sufficient compensation. Otherwise it would be difficult for the government to smoothly execute its integration policy due to the social opposition and resistance of those deprived from the gains of economic integration.
In order to enhance the above? mentioned domestic political capacities, the article argues that the government needs to set the objectives and direction of its domestic negotiation with interest groups as follows: (1) maximize social support for the integration policy; and, (2) minimize social opposition.
For support maximization, it is important for the government to try to form a grand policy coalition with the public as well as with organized interest groups, such as big businesses. However, it is much harder to mobilize and get support from individuals, who are part of the general public, than from organized groups. In this case, the role of the government is especially important. The level of support will be determined by the performance of the government as a political entrepreneur.
The most important mechanism to minimize opposition is, of course, compensation. However, South Korea has not yet prepared a systematic system for compensation. Among the various ways in obtaining a systematic approach, the organization of a 'national council' for social deliberation in which both the losers and the winners participate along with the government, appears to be the best method under the given socio-political conditions of the country. The question of how to raise funds for the compensation system is another issue that must be addressed. Governmental budget should be fundamentally allotted to the fund. Still, seeking a new source of revenue abroad by raising common funds (e.g. European Structural Fund) could also be considered. If that should be the case, the South Korean government may expect the compensation money to come, let's say, from the "Northeast Asian Common Fund."
In order to enhance the above? mentioned domestic political capacities, the article argues that the government needs to set the objectives and direction of its domestic negotiation with interest groups as follows: (1) maximize social support for the integration policy; and, (2) minimize social opposition.
For support maximization, it is important for the government to try to form a grand policy coalition with the public as well as with organized interest groups, such as big businesses. However, it is much harder to mobilize and get support from individuals, who are part of the general public, than from organized groups. In this case, the role of the government is especially important. The level of support will be determined by the performance of the government as a political entrepreneur.
The most important mechanism to minimize opposition is, of course, compensation. However, South Korea has not yet prepared a systematic system for compensation. Among the various ways in obtaining a systematic approach, the organization of a 'national council' for social deliberation in which both the losers and the winners participate along with the government, appears to be the best method under the given socio-political conditions of the country. The question of how to raise funds for the compensation system is another issue that must be addressed. Governmental budget should be fundamentally allotted to the fund. Still, seeking a new source of revenue abroad by raising common funds (e.g. European Structural Fund) could also be considered. If that should be the case, the South Korean government may expect the compensation money to come, let's say, from the "Northeast Asian Common Fund."
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 지지 세력의 강화를 위하여
Ⅲ. 반대 세력의 약화를 위하여
Ⅳ. 나가는 말
[참고문헌]
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Government 3.0 : Is it working?
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2014 .07
-
經濟統合에 관한 考察
기업과혁신연구
1981 .02
-
서울의 차세대 전자정부 모델 연구
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2009 .12
-
아시아를 선도하는 한국형 전자정부에 관한 연구
한국비교정부학보
2006 .01
-
The Role of Government in Agriculture : Government and Social Policies in the United States
한국정책과학학회보
1998 .12
-
The Challenge of Social Integration in South Korea
Global Asia
2017 .06
-
정부총지출이 정부효과성에 미치는 영향 : 40개국 패널분석을 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2009 .11
-
정책홍보·정책수단·정책산출 그리고 정부역량이 정부신뢰에 미치는 영향: 국민인식조사를 중심으로
정부학연구
2017 .01
-
A Study on the Political Integration of South and North Korea : focused on the Political Integration Designs in the Unification Policies and the Unification Schemes of South and North Korea
아세아연구
2002 .03
-
Development Cooperation for Economic Integration of East and South Asia
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2008 .12
-
지방행정체제 개편에 따른 지방재정의 변화
한국지방재정논집
2011 .04
-
남북한 실질적 통합단계에서의 행정체제 구축방안
사회과학연구
2003 .08
-
REGIONAL INTEGRATION IN EAST ASIA AND PERSPECTIVES FOR ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION IN NORTH KOREA - LESSONS FROM EUROPE
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2003 .01
-
민주화이후 한국정부의 대북정책 성향 및 전략 비교 : 김대중-노무현 정부와 이명박 정부를 중심으로
국제정치연구
2010 .12
-
Trajectory of European Integration and Lessons for Regional Cooperation in East Asia : The Costs of Success
국제정치논총
2003 .12
-
자치단체간 생활권을 기반으로 한 행정구역 자율통합
한국지역개발학회지
2010 .03
-
도ㆍ농 통합시 개발에 관한 연구 : 충북 진천군을 중심으로
지역정책연구
2012 .06
-
통합이론에 비추어 본 유럽통합과 한반도통합
유럽연구
2003 .06
-
지역개발사업의 통합적 추진방안 : 신공공관리적 접근방법을 중심으로
국토연구
2007 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-350-018360794