지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
After “Tufan” dynasty disappeared, many government substances that begun to occupy some region at Tibet, Tibet Buddhism reorganized Buddhist culture to Tibet society. On this circumstance, 13century the Mongol empire dominated Tibet. Since the Mongol empire's dominance, are the Tibetan Buddhist State sponsored by powerful external militant force was formed in Tibet. First of all Tibet Buddhism and external sponsor force should be considered for studying monarchy power of Tibet. As a real emperor who ruled the whole nation did not exist, Dalai Lama's are Tibetan Buddhist State as a main government.
Dalai Lama's the Tibetan Buddhist State was not dominate force in political aspects. A religion-politics force, such as Dalai Lama or Panchen Lama, occupied the mainland of Tibet through the religious authority of Dalai Lama. Independent kingdom and self-government ruled the eastern, northeastern, western and southern except for the mainland. Substantial dominant force of Dalai Lama' central government generally didn't affect the whole of Tibet. According to this view, monarchy power of Tibet was the thing that controls wide region, however, the fact was that the power controlled very limited region.
Since 1720s Tibet was sponsored by Qing dynasty, the Qing dynasty sent ambassador to Tibet for internal intervention. The western's shock, especially the British Empire's approaches stroke enormous shocks to Tibet that was subjected by Qing. The British Empire's approaches and extension of their force in Tibet of influence were regarded as threaten of Buddhist civilization. Change of monarchy power was inevitable to cope with powerful modern countries in Tibet.
Dalai Lama 13th who ruled Tibet directly played an important role in change. He changed Tibet's sponsor from Qing to the British Empire in the competition of the British Empire, Qing and the Republican China. This is because Qing or the Republican China had not admitted relationship as an equivalent partner between Tibet and China, but they regarded the relationship as ruling and subjection.
Then Dalai Lama 13th put an effort into domestic reform to dispersed pluralistically to centralized authoritarian form. Also, there was deep connection between the Panchen Lama the 9th's escaping from China in 1923 and this problem. Dalai Lama's reform often violatedexisting governments' autonomous rights, because of that Panchen Lama opposed to this aspect. Tibet in 1920s was still a kind of commonwealth consisted of anti-independent force.
Although Dalai Lama 13th's effort to establish a modern nation obtained some results, there seemed to be some limitation to unify semi-independent force. Because Dalai Lama's foundation was a conservative Buddhist party and Tibet was still under influence China and England.
Tibetan mainland could keep their country independent from 1912 to 1950. Two main reasons made it possible; one was England wanted Tibet's mainland to keep a neutral zone the other was the Republican China hadn’t done a positive policy to Tibet in its internal and external troubles and England's restraint.
Dalai Lama's the Tibetan Buddhist State was not dominate force in political aspects. A religion-politics force, such as Dalai Lama or Panchen Lama, occupied the mainland of Tibet through the religious authority of Dalai Lama. Independent kingdom and self-government ruled the eastern, northeastern, western and southern except for the mainland. Substantial dominant force of Dalai Lama' central government generally didn't affect the whole of Tibet. According to this view, monarchy power of Tibet was the thing that controls wide region, however, the fact was that the power controlled very limited region.
Since 1720s Tibet was sponsored by Qing dynasty, the Qing dynasty sent ambassador to Tibet for internal intervention. The western's shock, especially the British Empire's approaches stroke enormous shocks to Tibet that was subjected by Qing. The British Empire's approaches and extension of their force in Tibet of influence were regarded as threaten of Buddhist civilization. Change of monarchy power was inevitable to cope with powerful modern countries in Tibet.
Dalai Lama 13th who ruled Tibet directly played an important role in change. He changed Tibet's sponsor from Qing to the British Empire in the competition of the British Empire, Qing and the Republican China. This is because Qing or the Republican China had not admitted relationship as an equivalent partner between Tibet and China, but they regarded the relationship as ruling and subjection.
Then Dalai Lama 13th put an effort into domestic reform to dispersed pluralistically to centralized authoritarian form. Also, there was deep connection between the Panchen Lama the 9th's escaping from China in 1923 and this problem. Dalai Lama's reform often violatedexisting governments' autonomous rights, because of that Panchen Lama opposed to this aspect. Tibet in 1920s was still a kind of commonwealth consisted of anti-independent force.
Although Dalai Lama 13th's effort to establish a modern nation obtained some results, there seemed to be some limitation to unify semi-independent force. Because Dalai Lama's foundation was a conservative Buddhist party and Tibet was still under influence China and England.
Tibetan mainland could keep their country independent from 1912 to 1950. Two main reasons made it possible; one was England wanted Tibet's mainland to keep a neutral zone the other was the Republican China hadn’t done a positive policy to Tibet in its internal and external troubles and England's restraint.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 19세기 중반 대외위기의 심화와 친정 이전의 13대 달라이 라마
Ⅲ. 친정 이후 ‘청조 세력 구축’까지 13대 달라이 라마의 군주제 인식과 대외인식
Ⅳ. ‘독립’ 이후의 13대 달라이 라마의 군주 인식과 대외인식
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
【논문초록】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
20세기 전반기 달라이 라마의 이미지 변화 : 전쟁과 자연재해와 관련하여
동북아 문화연구
2010 .06
-
티베트 불교와 ‘달라이 라마’의 역사정치학 : ‘정치와 종교’의 얽힘과 분화를 중심으로
한국동양정치사상사연구
2005 .09
-
'티벳지위'에 관한 중국정부와 달라이 라마의 태도 분석과 전망(1950-2020) : "티벳독립" 운동을 중심으로
아시아연구
2003 .06
-
중국의 티베트 정책 고찰(1949~2008) : 민족문제에 대한 중국 공산당의 인식을 중심으로
국제정치논총
2009 .12
-
China-Tibet Relations from 1950 till 2008: The Interaction between Religion, Nationalism, and Reform
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2010 .01
-
1913년 “티벳·몽골 조약”을 통해 본 청대 티벳 불교권의 유산
몽골학
2013 .01
-
중국의 민족문제와 티베트 이슈 : '화평해방(和平解放) 17개조 협의'를 중심으로
한국동북아논총
2004 .03
-
티베트의 분리 독립 운동과 14세 달라이 라마의 중도 노선
아시아연구
2009 .03
-
지혜에 대한 달라이 라마의 접근
남아시아연구
2007 .02
-
중국, 티베트, 좌파
마르크스21
2020 .04
-
티벳의 국제법적 지위와 自決權
法學論文集
2008 .01
-
티베트 문제에 대한 국제사회의 개입과 중국의 대응 : 2008년 3월 유혈분쟁과 북경올림픽을 중심으로
한국동북아논총
2010 .06
-
13세기 후반 티베트와 훌레구 울루스
중앙아시아연구
2012 .01
-
The Assimilation of the Yijing in Tibetan History and Culture
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2019 .01
-
Tibetan Separatism in China
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2009 .01
-
중국의 티베트 인식과 1962년 중-인 국경분쟁
동북아 문화연구
2005 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-910-002130794