지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Jeongjo primarily agreed with the Sarim figures’ argument of Confucian governing, which dictated that a king should be well versed in the teachings of the ancient sage kings, but he also believed that the person who should be held ultimately responsible for the job, was the king. Without a doubt he accepted the political ideology of Confucianism, yet he wanted to overcome the existing format of Confucian governing which was designed not with the king but the vassals at the center. He intended to design his future governing, with him at the very center.
In the latter half of the Joseon dynasty, Sangeon and Gyeokjaeng appeals continued to grow in number and also escalate in their general tone of frustration, so Jeongjo ordered that making Gyeokjaeng appeals should be permitted alongside the royal guards(衛外擊錚). And he also allowed civilian lawsuits(民訴, essentially Sangeon and Gyeokjaeng procedures) to be filed for the so-called ‘Mineun(民隱)’ cases, which were caused by social and economic wrong doings of the powerful beings.
By communicating with his subjects, Jeongjo wanted to make a community where all people could live peacefully together. And his efforts continued in two terms: first, viewing the capital and the local regions equally(一視京外), in order to diminish regional discrimination, and second, taking from the top people to support the lower ones(損上益下). These were the conclusions Jeongjo drew from his own reasoning and actions.
In the latter half of the Joseon dynasty, Sangeon and Gyeokjaeng appeals continued to grow in number and also escalate in their general tone of frustration, so Jeongjo ordered that making Gyeokjaeng appeals should be permitted alongside the royal guards(衛外擊錚). And he also allowed civilian lawsuits(民訴, essentially Sangeon and Gyeokjaeng procedures) to be filed for the so-called ‘Mineun(民隱)’ cases, which were caused by social and economic wrong doings of the powerful beings.
By communicating with his subjects, Jeongjo wanted to make a community where all people could live peacefully together. And his efforts continued in two terms: first, viewing the capital and the local regions equally(一視京外), in order to diminish regional discrimination, and second, taking from the top people to support the lower ones(損上益下). These were the conclusions Jeongjo drew from his own reasoning and actions.
#상언(Sangeon: appeals made to the king)
#격쟁(Gyeokjaeng: beating a gong to draw the king's attention)
#민소(civilian lawsuit)
#소통(communication)
#대동 사회(a community where all people could live peacefully together)
#일시경외(viewing the capital and local regions equally)
#손상익하(taking from the top people to support the lowerones)
목차
머리말
1. 군주론
2. 소통론
3. 대동사회론
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (20)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
어찰의 정치학 : 정조와 심환지
역사비평
2009 .05
-
正祖의 先代王 認識과 그 特徵 - 『日得錄』 ｢訓語條｣를 중심으로
온지논총
2009 .01
-
정조의 俗學 비판과 正學論
한국사연구
2007 .12
-
1990년대 한국사회의 ‘정조신드롬’ 대두와 배경 : 나약한 임금에서 절대계몽군주로의 재탄생
국학연구
2011 .06
-
正祖의 更張策과 王權强化論 - 文武兼全論과 實學的 經世觀을 中心으로
동양고전연구
2008 .01
-
正祖의 策問에 나타난 愛民思想 硏究
漢文古典硏究
2008 .01
-
高宗의 ‘正祖 계승론’에 대한 검토와 試論
인문학연구
2009 .12
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
正祖의 宋時烈 顯彰과 王權 强化論
한국사연구
2008 .06
-
총론 : 새롭게 보는 정조와 19세기
역사비평
2016 .05
-
正祖의 士大夫 認識과 그 特徵
동양고전연구
2008 .01
-
정조의 자연·만물관과 공존의 정치
역사비평
2016 .05
-
학문의 자유와 통제 : 이옥의 문체와 정조의 문체반정
한국학연구
2009 .06
-
正祖의 文章觀에 대한 再考
동방한문학
2014 .01
-
정조의 대학 이해의 특징
동양철학연구
2020 .01
-
The Construction and Characteristics of Hwaseong Fortress in the Era of King Jeongjo
Korea Journal
2001 .03
-
19세기 정조의 잔영과 그에 대한 기억
역사비평
2016 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-905-019095964