지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims to review the East Asia discourse of Changbi Group and to search a new innovative path of it. Directed by Paik, Nak-chung, ‘The Quarterly Changbi’ has lead the East Asia discourse of South Korea, based on the ‘Division System’ and ‘Transforming middle Way’ for last twenty-years. The Division System is a periodical defining concept which distinguishes it from the ‘Cold War System,’ and it also connotes a more complex system which is closely linked with global capitalism. On the other hand, the Transforming middle Way is a practical principal and philosophy to overcome the division system. That is, it is transforming in the sense that it pursues to overcome the division system and it is also a Middle way because it avoids falling into any specific philosophical deflection.
Unfortunately, it seems vague that how these two perspectives, the acknowledgement of the division system and any practices of the Middle way, would and could be applied and interpreted in (North)East Asia. The main reason of this question is based on how it sets the relationship between ‘Korean Peninsula-Centered Vision’ and East Asia. As indicates the ‘Transforming Middle Way’ of Paik, Nak-chung, the process to overcome the division system itself is a field of which a new subject is forming, and it is simultaneously used as a tool of struggle to overcome the division system in a circle. Therefore, it begins with a ‘National subject’, but it has to connect with a formation of new East Asiatic subject. Thus, the main task of the East Asia discourse which is combined with the division system has to be placed in a formation of a field or motivation that encourages establishing any subjects beyond Korea or Korean peninsula.
Moreover, the Korean Peninsula-Centered Vision leads us to understand that Korean/Korean peninsula has a coincidental and external relationship with East Asia. However, the process of overcoming the division system itself has to be appreciated as a cooperative regional field and a preliminary field to prepare the advert of East Asia community. In order to achieve this, East Asia has to be internalized in Korea/Korean peninsula and its way is ironically that bigger East Asia is melted into smaller Korea/Korean peninsula.
In the perspective of East Asia, Korean peninsula is a unique place to experiment that there is a hierarchical structure but this suppressing structure plays the least role within region. I think, if the Unification of Korea is understood as a process without a premise of a fixed final form, it is a task of East Asia discourse to prove that the regional cooperation and participation in East Asia is a necessary requirement in this process. Thus, I believe that an innovative path of East Asia discourse lies here.
Unfortunately, it seems vague that how these two perspectives, the acknowledgement of the division system and any practices of the Middle way, would and could be applied and interpreted in (North)East Asia. The main reason of this question is based on how it sets the relationship between ‘Korean Peninsula-Centered Vision’ and East Asia. As indicates the ‘Transforming Middle Way’ of Paik, Nak-chung, the process to overcome the division system itself is a field of which a new subject is forming, and it is simultaneously used as a tool of struggle to overcome the division system in a circle. Therefore, it begins with a ‘National subject’, but it has to connect with a formation of new East Asiatic subject. Thus, the main task of the East Asia discourse which is combined with the division system has to be placed in a formation of a field or motivation that encourages establishing any subjects beyond Korea or Korean peninsula.
Moreover, the Korean Peninsula-Centered Vision leads us to understand that Korean/Korean peninsula has a coincidental and external relationship with East Asia. However, the process of overcoming the division system itself has to be appreciated as a cooperative regional field and a preliminary field to prepare the advert of East Asia community. In order to achieve this, East Asia has to be internalized in Korea/Korean peninsula and its way is ironically that bigger East Asia is melted into smaller Korea/Korean peninsula.
In the perspective of East Asia, Korean peninsula is a unique place to experiment that there is a hierarchical structure but this suppressing structure plays the least role within region. I think, if the Unification of Korea is understood as a process without a premise of a fixed final form, it is a task of East Asia discourse to prove that the regional cooperation and participation in East Asia is a necessary requirement in this process. Thus, I believe that an innovative path of East Asia discourse lies here.
목차
Ⅰ. ‘동아시아론’에 대한 의혹
Ⅱ. 분단체제론과 ‘변혁적 중도주의’
Ⅲ. 분단체제론과 동아시아
Ⅳ. 한국의 동아시아론과 ‘한반도 중심주의’
Ⅴ. ‘변혁적 중도주의’와 동아시아론의 혁신 가능성
참고문헌
abstracts
참고문헌 (37)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
East Asia and Korea
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2001 .01
-
동아시아 시각의 인식론적 의의
아세아연구
2009 .03
-
동북아시아 공동체의 의미탐구 : 역사 궤적, 그리고 관심들ㆍ관점들ㆍ이해관계의 측면에서
아세아연구
2007 .09
-
동아시아라는 번역공간 : 한국의 동아시아론에 관한 지식사회학적 연구
경제와사회
2012 .03
-
The Economic Strength of East Asia
아세아연구
1984 .01
-
The Next U.S. Administration and its Policies toward East Asia and the Korean Peninsula: A Chinese Perspective
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2008 .01
-
East Asia Economic Integration
[KIEP] 월간 KIEP 세계경제
2002 .11
-
일본의 동아시아사고 : 脫亞와 興亞의 이중변주
아세아연구
2010 .12
-
Korea and East Asia in a Changing Regional and Global Environment
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2012 .12
-
East Asia in World Politics
평화연구
2010 .04
-
The US in East Asia : Not Architecture, But Action
Global Asia
2007 .09
-
Reconciling Confucianism with Human Rights in East Asia: A Critical Reconstruction of the Contemporary Discourse of Korean Scholars
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2014 .01
-
A Search for the Perspective on the Studies of East Asia: Centering on Chinese Studies
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2001 .01
-
The Case for Regional Financial Cooperation in East Asia
[KIEP] 월간 KIEP 세계경제
2002 .12
-
The First, the Second and the Third Food Regime in East Asia
대한지리학회 컨퍼런스 자료집
2011 .11
-
East Asian Economic Integration and US East Asia Trade Policy
인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 학술대회
2009 .08
-
East Asian Economic Integration and US East Asia Trade Policy
인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 학술대회
2009 .08
-
Financial Development and Integration in East Asia
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2003 .12
-
The Concept of 'Chong Kyo'(宗敎, Religion) and 'Li'(理, Reason) in East Asia : From the perspective of comparison between Korea and Japan
아세아연구
2001 .12
-
A Critical Review on Regional Integration Processes in East Asia
인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 학술대회
2009 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-019122723