지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The rapid developments in science and technology, which increasingly affect our understanding of life and life itself, resulted in a strong demand for a global response to the ethical implications of such developments. Ethical issues raised by the rapid advances in science and their technological applications should be examined with due respect to the dignity of the human person and universal respect for human rights. In order to support for research, national or regional governments shall arrange all necessary measures to deal effectively with problems concerning bioethics that may arise during the process of developing and utilizing biotechnology.
According to Bioethics and Bio-safety Act (2005) in Korea, there shall exist a National Bioethics Committee, responsible to the President, whose function it is to review the issues concerning bioethics and biosafety in the life sciences and biotechnology. The Committee will be composed of between 16 and 21 persons, including one Chairperson and one Vice-Chairperson. Membership in the Committee shall be as follows. The following ministers will all be members of the Committee: the Minister of Education and Human Resources Development, the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Science and Technology, the Minister of Commerce, the Minister of Industry and Energy, the Minister of Health and Welfare, the Minister of Gender Equality, and the Minister of Government Legislation. The president will appoint not more than seven representatives of the academic, scientific, and industrial spheres, each of whom have professional knowledge and experience in the fields of life science or medical science. The president will appoint not more than seven representatives of the fields of religion, philosophy, ethics, social science, law, NGO groups, or gender equality.
There is no question that bio-technological developments have been, and can be, of great benefit to humankind in increasing life expectancy and improving the quality of life. But we should emphasize that such developments should always seek in the recognition of the dignity of the human person and universal respect for human rights. Last year some serious accidents in relation to bioethics and research ethics occurred in Korea. We should recognize the need for such research and developments to occur within the framework of bioethical principles. To promote equitable access to bio-technological developments, we should foster multidisciplinary and pluralistic dialogue about issues within society.
First of all, independent and multidisciplinary ethics committees should be established and promoted at the appropriate level in order to assess the relevant ethical, legal, scientific and social issues related to research projects involving human beings. In the same way, ethics committees should provide advice and appropriate assessment on ethical problems. We should promote professionalism, honesty and integrity and transparency in ethical decision-making on all conflicts of interest and appropriate sharing of knowledge. The ethical committees should functionally fulfill its tasks and carry out their work in accordance with the principles of bioethics and biosafety.
According to Bioethics and Bio-safety Act (2005) in Korea, there shall exist a National Bioethics Committee, responsible to the President, whose function it is to review the issues concerning bioethics and biosafety in the life sciences and biotechnology. The Committee will be composed of between 16 and 21 persons, including one Chairperson and one Vice-Chairperson. Membership in the Committee shall be as follows. The following ministers will all be members of the Committee: the Minister of Education and Human Resources Development, the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Science and Technology, the Minister of Commerce, the Minister of Industry and Energy, the Minister of Health and Welfare, the Minister of Gender Equality, and the Minister of Government Legislation. The president will appoint not more than seven representatives of the academic, scientific, and industrial spheres, each of whom have professional knowledge and experience in the fields of life science or medical science. The president will appoint not more than seven representatives of the fields of religion, philosophy, ethics, social science, law, NGO groups, or gender equality.
There is no question that bio-technological developments have been, and can be, of great benefit to humankind in increasing life expectancy and improving the quality of life. But we should emphasize that such developments should always seek in the recognition of the dignity of the human person and universal respect for human rights. Last year some serious accidents in relation to bioethics and research ethics occurred in Korea. We should recognize the need for such research and developments to occur within the framework of bioethical principles. To promote equitable access to bio-technological developments, we should foster multidisciplinary and pluralistic dialogue about issues within society.
First of all, independent and multidisciplinary ethics committees should be established and promoted at the appropriate level in order to assess the relevant ethical, legal, scientific and social issues related to research projects involving human beings. In the same way, ethics committees should provide advice and appropriate assessment on ethical problems. We should promote professionalism, honesty and integrity and transparency in ethical decision-making on all conflicts of interest and appropriate sharing of knowledge. The ethical committees should functionally fulfill its tasks and carry out their work in accordance with the principles of bioethics and biosafety.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 국가생명윤리심의위원회의 운영 경과
Ⅲ. 합의체로서 구성의 중립성 문제와 개선방안
Ⅳ. 탈정치성에 의한 신뢰성 확보의 문제
Ⅴ. 위원회 기능의 충실성 문제와 실질적 조사권한
Ⅵ. 맺는 말
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
'생명윤리및안전에관한법률'에 대한 비판적 검토
생명윤리
2004 .06
-
한국 생명윤리의 과거와 현재
생명, 윤리와 정책
2017 .04
-
생명윤리교육이 간호보건대학생의 생명윤리의식에 미치는 영향
생명윤리
2013 .06
-
「생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률」에 따른 기관생명윤리위원회 평가인증제도에 대한 고찰
생명윤리
2015 .12
-
생명과학과 생명윤리 및 법
생명, 윤리와 정책
2017 .04
-
한국 생명윤리의 과거와 현재 그리고 미래
생명, 윤리와 정책
2017 .04
-
간호사의 생명윤리의식 훈련 프로그램 설계에 관한 연구
생명윤리
2019 .12
-
Bioethics and Biosafety Act
생명윤리
2004 .12
-
생명윤리 및 안전 관련 입법정책
생명윤리
2003 .06
-
대학교육현장에서의 생명윤리교육 : 대구대학교의 사례를 중심으로
생명윤리
2009 .06
-
기관생명윤리위원회를 통한 자율 규제의 현황과 전망 : 기관위원회 평가·인증 사업 경험을 바탕으로
생명, 윤리와 정책
2017 .10
-
人間胚芽複製의 問題點과 解決方案 : 生命倫理法의 改善方案을 中心으로
생명윤리
2005 .06
-
인체유래 생물자원 관련 생명윤리정책 제언
생명윤리
2010 .06
-
규제에서 소통으로 : 국가생명윤리심의위원회의 변화에 관한 제언
생명, 윤리와 정책
2017 .10
-
국내학술지에 게재된 생명윤리의식에 관한 간호연구의 동향
문화기술의 융합
2018 .01
-
[연구논단 1] 유네스코 생명윤리와 인권 보편선언의 분석 : 선언의 윤리적, 법적 의미 고찰 및 한국의 생명윤리 규정 검토
생명윤리
2007 .12
-
장애 이해의 해석학적 구조화와 법 : 생명윤리안전법상 유전자검사 규율의 방향 모색
생명윤리
2015 .12
-
생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률과 유전자 윤리
생명윤리
2010 .06
-
생명윤리 입법과정에 관한 정책네트워크 분석, 1997~2003
기술혁신학회지
2005 .08
-
초등 도덕과 교육에서의 생명 윤리 교육
생명윤리
2008 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-570-001934021