지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis is to understand the meaning of Kim Hyun's strategy of remaining reader instead of critic with the concept of reading and reflection.
Western dualism was the center of Kim Hyun's literary thought in 60s. The establishment of the type of idea suitable for korean situation, however, became the main concern. It was considered as a solution to the chronic problem in Korean society such as nihilism, the absence of individual, and differentiation of thought. Kim Hyun had a dual attitude toward idea. He thought idea was the necessary factor in Korea because idea would helped to overcome nihilism and defeatism. But He also thought that idea could be a suppressive factor someday.
Kim Hyun studied imagination and desire from mid-70s because the introduction of idea which is not proper in our society could be the cause of newness-comflex. A study on imagination and desire was the response to the suppressive society in 80s. Literary experience is the synthesis of pleasure and torture in Kim Hyun's criticism. According to Kim Hyun, Literature is useless, so it gives us a chance to think of suppression. Uselessness is not the primary factor in Kim Hyun's thought. The most important thing is that reader should treat literary works as useless thing in order for the works to give a chance to think of suppression. This attitude means that reader should keep distance from pleasure and follow the inner voice that you must not follow the joy. The phantom of tortured I is the necessary factor here and this is related to super ego's voice in Kant's philosophy. Pleasure in pain is also key factor in reading.
Aesthetic state is both a sign of negation of modern society and a foundation of literary autonomy. Literary image can be a cause of aesthetic state of unlimited possibility and can function as indirect resistance again society. Literary autonomy is the evidence of human freedom.
According to Kim Hyun, subject is defined as distance. Desire and society is the object of reflection in Kim Hyun's thought. Reflection can make reflective subject distant from himself. But reflective subject can't say that he is free from desire because the difference between the enunciated and the enunciating subject. Kim Hyun, however, would not give up the belief that constant symbolization can relieve the negativity of trauma from the suppression of desire. Finally, he encountered the unacceptable conclusion that desire is the cause of violence. He finds himself surrounded by the closde circle of desire.
Society without repression is the final destiny of Kim Hyun's thought. It is the object of thought, not of recognition. It exists beyond our intuition and recognition. Kim Hyun meets the antinomy of undecidedness owing to the fauilure of symbolization. Language can't say everything. Society without repression is criteria of human thought and can function as criticism of the negativity of existing society. Kim Hyun hesitate between the undetermined state and the order caused by the exclusion of the lost thing.
Reflective subject can find his identity only through the act of reflection. If he stop the reflection, he will meet the danger of losing his identity. Reading and writing is a method of making sure that he is free and is distant from the desire. The attitude of remaning of reader is a way to exist bewteen the the demand of symbolization and the negation of repressive conceptualization.
Western dualism was the center of Kim Hyun's literary thought in 60s. The establishment of the type of idea suitable for korean situation, however, became the main concern. It was considered as a solution to the chronic problem in Korean society such as nihilism, the absence of individual, and differentiation of thought. Kim Hyun had a dual attitude toward idea. He thought idea was the necessary factor in Korea because idea would helped to overcome nihilism and defeatism. But He also thought that idea could be a suppressive factor someday.
Kim Hyun studied imagination and desire from mid-70s because the introduction of idea which is not proper in our society could be the cause of newness-comflex. A study on imagination and desire was the response to the suppressive society in 80s. Literary experience is the synthesis of pleasure and torture in Kim Hyun's criticism. According to Kim Hyun, Literature is useless, so it gives us a chance to think of suppression. Uselessness is not the primary factor in Kim Hyun's thought. The most important thing is that reader should treat literary works as useless thing in order for the works to give a chance to think of suppression. This attitude means that reader should keep distance from pleasure and follow the inner voice that you must not follow the joy. The phantom of tortured I is the necessary factor here and this is related to super ego's voice in Kant's philosophy. Pleasure in pain is also key factor in reading.
Aesthetic state is both a sign of negation of modern society and a foundation of literary autonomy. Literary image can be a cause of aesthetic state of unlimited possibility and can function as indirect resistance again society. Literary autonomy is the evidence of human freedom.
According to Kim Hyun, subject is defined as distance. Desire and society is the object of reflection in Kim Hyun's thought. Reflection can make reflective subject distant from himself. But reflective subject can't say that he is free from desire because the difference between the enunciated and the enunciating subject. Kim Hyun, however, would not give up the belief that constant symbolization can relieve the negativity of trauma from the suppression of desire. Finally, he encountered the unacceptable conclusion that desire is the cause of violence. He finds himself surrounded by the closde circle of desire.
Society without repression is the final destiny of Kim Hyun's thought. It is the object of thought, not of recognition. It exists beyond our intuition and recognition. Kim Hyun meets the antinomy of undecidedness owing to the fauilure of symbolization. Language can't say everything. Society without repression is criteria of human thought and can function as criticism of the negativity of existing society. Kim Hyun hesitate between the undetermined state and the order caused by the exclusion of the lost thing.
Reflective subject can find his identity only through the act of reflection. If he stop the reflection, he will meet the danger of losing his identity. Reading and writing is a method of making sure that he is free and is distant from the desire. The attitude of remaning of reader is a way to exist bewteen the the demand of symbolization and the negation of repressive conceptualization.
목차
1. 4ㆍ19로의 회귀와 독자로 남기
2. 이념형의 설정과 양가적 태도
3. 독자의 태도 변화와 상상력
4. 욕망과 보편성의 불화
5. 억압 없는 사회와 이름붙이기
6. ‘독자로 남아있기’와 반성적 주체의 전략
참고문헌
참고문헌 (38)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
김현 후기 비평과 고백의 형식
한국문학과 예술
2017 .03
-
김현 비평의 정치성 : 김수영 비평을 중심으로
어문논총
2013 .08
-
비평가 김현의 삶과 문학 : 김현평전 기술을 위한 試論
어문론집
2010 .07
-
김현 비평과 정신분석 방법론
현대문학의 연구
2018 .01
-
김현의 비평과 『문학과지성』의 형성과정
비평문학
2007 .12
-
김현 비평에서의 미와 숭고의 변증법
우리문학연구
2009 .10
-
김현승 시론에 나타난 ‘윤리’ 개념과 시적 전유
우리말글
2019 .03
-
김현 비평 연구 : 문학의 자율성 테제를 중심으로
어문논총
2015 .12
-
김현구의 시문학 고찰
어문논총
2012 .08
-
「金講師와 T敎授」에 내재된 지식인의 욕망 연구
어문학
2004 .03
-
김현 비평에 나타난 ‘나’와 ‘만남’의 문제
비평문학
2020 .06
-
가부장적 서사 장치의 강화, <김현감호>의 플롯 연구
韓國古典硏究
2019 .01
-
1960~1970년대 이상론(李箱論)의 향방
구보학보
2019 .01
-
현덕 작품의 제재화 특성 분석 － 초등학교 및 중학교 국어 교과서를 중심으로 －
문학교육학
2018 .01
-
김현 비평에 있어서의 고향의 문화사적 의미
비평문학
2011 .12
-
김현승 시에서 자연의 의미
우리말글
2007 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-810-001870263