지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
An author who went over to North Korea, Lee Tae Jun, once rose to an importance position, but failed to escape the wind of purging, which began in 1952. He was pressed hard his past for ideological conflicts, and he certainly is one of zeniths of pains in the literature world after dying a hard life wandering from a proofreader of a newspaper publisher, worker of block factory or coal mine, and more.
However, he has been taken care of in North Korea for political reasons within North Korea, and is a true fact that the perception that Lee Tae Jun has was a sacrifice of ideology has operated good and bad. If so, Lee Tae Jun is no one but a powerless author being dragged around along the flow of politics in North Korea. But the ideologies and selection of social structure he showed after freedom was definitely an action that strongly reflects his intention, and a necessity to understand his creative works after going over to North Korea needs to be initiated in the same coherence.
From this perspective, Lee Tae Jun was sure to have hidden his political stand conflicting with the political flow of North Korea by analyzing First Battle and Going Home, which were excluded until now. He was not an author who took advantage of North Korea's political flow, nor was he a blind man to obey to one extreme belief. He was rather a character to worried of his literature and politics in a limited environment, North Korea, during the wartime.
Such worries are shown in works like Dust, and the last works he left, First Battle and Going Home showed a delicate and complex description, which are hard to find in other works. Also, he did not emphasize on violence and cruelty like other authors, and minimized the form of Kim Il Sung. Such situations were hard to find the literature world of North Korea at that time, and can understand Lee Tae Jun's faith to become eliminated even after excluding the fact that he had relations with part of South Korea.
In this aspect, there must be some corrections in discussion until now concerning Lee Tae Jun and his works after going over to North Korea. The literature reality of North Korea not allowing individuality must be considered, and it can become a valuable means to under author who have gone over to North Korea while proving the differentiation consi-dering the general flow.
However, he has been taken care of in North Korea for political reasons within North Korea, and is a true fact that the perception that Lee Tae Jun has was a sacrifice of ideology has operated good and bad. If so, Lee Tae Jun is no one but a powerless author being dragged around along the flow of politics in North Korea. But the ideologies and selection of social structure he showed after freedom was definitely an action that strongly reflects his intention, and a necessity to understand his creative works after going over to North Korea needs to be initiated in the same coherence.
From this perspective, Lee Tae Jun was sure to have hidden his political stand conflicting with the political flow of North Korea by analyzing First Battle and Going Home, which were excluded until now. He was not an author who took advantage of North Korea's political flow, nor was he a blind man to obey to one extreme belief. He was rather a character to worried of his literature and politics in a limited environment, North Korea, during the wartime.
Such worries are shown in works like Dust, and the last works he left, First Battle and Going Home showed a delicate and complex description, which are hard to find in other works. Also, he did not emphasize on violence and cruelty like other authors, and minimized the form of Kim Il Sung. Such situations were hard to find the literature world of North Korea at that time, and can understand Lee Tae Jun's faith to become eliminated even after excluding the fact that he had relations with part of South Korea.
In this aspect, there must be some corrections in discussion until now concerning Lee Tae Jun and his works after going over to North Korea. The literature reality of North Korea not allowing individuality must be considered, and it can become a valuable means to under author who have gone over to North Korea while proving the differentiation consi-dering the general flow.
목차
1. 문제제기
2. 북한문학의 절대성과 이태준 문학의 상대성
3. 예술성과 정치성, 그 사이의 숨바꼭질
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
월북의 의미-이태준의 경우
비평문학
2004 .06
-
한 근대주의자의 신념과 좌절 - 해방 후 이태준 소설의 변모 양상
돈암어문학
2004 .12
-
이태준 희곡 연구
국어국문학
1994 .12
-
재북 시기 리태준의 문필 활동 실증
외국문학연구
2016 .02
-
체호프와 이태준의 소설에 나타난 지식인들의 (내면)세계 : 작가의 자기 고백적 소설을 중심으로
슬라브학보
2006 .09
-
박태원 소설에 나타난 연속성과 불연속성(2)－1960년대 작품을 중심으로
어문연구
2008 .01
-
북한문학에 반영된 한국 현대사 연구 - 주요 역사적 사건을 통한 남북한 문학의 비교론적 관점을 중심으로 -
한국문학논총
2008 .01
-
교육대학 학생들의 북한 인식과 북한이해교육의 과제: 2016~2018년 「북한과 통일론」의 사례
윤리연구
2019 .01
-
남북한과『역사비평』 : 25년의 성과와 방향
역사비평
2012 .08
-
퇴고와 개작 : 이태준의 경우
현대소설연구
2017 .12
-
북한 6차 핵실험과 대외정책을 통해 본 남북한 교회교류 전망
신학과 목회
2017 .11
-
생태학적 관점에서 본 이태준 문학의 의미와 가치
현대소설연구
2006 .09
-
북한에서 민족주의 담론의 형성과 전개: ‘민족공조’와 ‘김일성민족’을 중심으로
민족연구
2013 .01
-
냉전기 김일성 개인숭배 비판과 북한사 인식 : 1970년대 미국인 방북기를 중심으로
역사와현실
2019 .03
-
동요시인 윤복진 연구 －북한에서의 활동을 중심으로
동화와 번역
2009 .01
-
Conflict and Development of the North-South Relationship in Korea
Korea Journal
1985 .08
-
통일과 북한에 대한 대학생의 의식조사 연구: 부산, 울산, 경남지역 대학생을 대상으로
한국민족문화
2020 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
"민충환(閔忠煥) 저(著), 이태준(李泰俊) 연구(硏究)
구인환
국어국문학
1989
.05
김기림, T. S. 엘리엇, 니체 : 김기림의 「아프리카 광상곡」과 엘리엇의 『황무지』에 나타난 니체의 영원 회귀 모티프 비교
김한성
한국현대문학연구
2015
.08
계몽의 반대편 : 이태준 역사소설에 나타난 여성, 고도(古都), 반계몽
유인혁
한국학연구
2013
.03
역사의 발견과 그 문학사적 의미 : 해방 후 이태준의 문학
류보선
한국현대문학연구
1991
.04
북한 초기문학과 ‘소련’이라는 참조점 : 조소문화 교류, 즈다노비즘, 번역된 냉전논리
유임하
동악어문학
2011
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-905-002500111