지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aims of this thesis is to examine Singer's critical views on speciesism, and to evaluate his argumentation with regard to human-being as a main subject of moral practice and obligation.
In Accordance to Singer's views, the existence of sentience is a sign to decide whether an object have interest or not. This assertion has grave meaning, in that this may awaken us to morally consider non-human life. However, These Singer's view should be carefully examined since some questions could be arisen on the reasoning itself and its process of Singer's views exist, and other views compared by Singers are also should be meaningfully discussed.
Singer's critical view on speciesism basically rests on the analogy between certain discriminating situations which happens in human society and the similar situation on the human-being and non-human species. This analogy suggests us not to discriminate animals on the grounds of biological differences between human-being and animals that can feel pain. However, the comparison between human-being and non-human species has different meaning in moral context at least. Furthermore, there is moral domain of values which biological fact would not explain.
In addition, we can take different positions with Singers on the valuing of the importance of natural differences between human and non-human species. Human potentiality is the essence of morality, moral consideration and moral acts. Moral consideration and acts can be realized only by human-being. Human-being is the subject of moral domain. The argument asserting equal consideration between human-being and non-human species based on sentience may implicate in the danger of favoritism on tentative moral standard which only sentient species can be morally treated as human-being. On the other hand, it may endanger human dignity without recognizing the moral subject, human-being.
Human-being should paid thorough reflection on the dignity of life in general as objects of moral consideration. However, we should not try to achieve moral universality relying on fragmentary biological factors, we should grow our sense of responsibility on the life in general as a moral subject.
In Accordance to Singer's views, the existence of sentience is a sign to decide whether an object have interest or not. This assertion has grave meaning, in that this may awaken us to morally consider non-human life. However, These Singer's view should be carefully examined since some questions could be arisen on the reasoning itself and its process of Singer's views exist, and other views compared by Singers are also should be meaningfully discussed.
Singer's critical view on speciesism basically rests on the analogy between certain discriminating situations which happens in human society and the similar situation on the human-being and non-human species. This analogy suggests us not to discriminate animals on the grounds of biological differences between human-being and animals that can feel pain. However, the comparison between human-being and non-human species has different meaning in moral context at least. Furthermore, there is moral domain of values which biological fact would not explain.
In addition, we can take different positions with Singers on the valuing of the importance of natural differences between human and non-human species. Human potentiality is the essence of morality, moral consideration and moral acts. Moral consideration and acts can be realized only by human-being. Human-being is the subject of moral domain. The argument asserting equal consideration between human-being and non-human species based on sentience may implicate in the danger of favoritism on tentative moral standard which only sentient species can be morally treated as human-being. On the other hand, it may endanger human dignity without recognizing the moral subject, human-being.
Human-being should paid thorough reflection on the dignity of life in general as objects of moral consideration. However, we should not try to achieve moral universality relying on fragmentary biological factors, we should grow our sense of responsibility on the life in general as a moral subject.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 종차별주의(Speciesism) 비판과 동물해방
Ⅲ. 싱어의 입장에 대한 비판적 검토
Ⅳ. 윤리적 실천 주체로서의 인간
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Different Sides of Human
International Digital Design Invitation Exhibition
2015 .07
-
Human Being
International Digital Design Invitation Exhibition
2012 .12
-
생명 윤리론에서 피터 싱어의 코페르니쿠스적 혁명에 대한 비판적 고찰
생명윤리
2012 .01
-
피터 싱어(Peter Singer)의 생명 윤리 소고 : ‘선호’(Preference)와 ‘인격체’(Person) 개념을 중심으로
생명윤리
2010 .12
-
19-human relationship-02
International Digital Design Invitation Exhibition
2019 .12
-
18-Human Relationship
International Digital Design Invitation Exhibition
2018 .05
-
19-human relationship-01
International Digital Design Invitation Exhibition
2019 .05
-
비즈니스 윤리의 이론적 기초
인문과학연구
2002 .02
-
Human Communication
International Digital Design Invitation Exhibition
2013 .12
-
Digital Human
International Digital Design Invitation Exhibition
2019 .05
-
Human Nature
International Digital Design Invitation Exhibition
2016 .05
-
Human and Nature
International Digital Design Invitation Exhibition
2013 .05
-
도덕 판단에서 나타나는 도덕-인습 구분에 대한 논쟁과 함의
인지과학
2018 .06
-
신학적 관점에서 본 생명
생명윤리
2001 .12
-
인간 배아의 인격 지위에 관한 고찰
생명윤리
2002 .12
-
동물권 옹호론과 영장류 실험에 대한 윤리적 검토
생명윤리
2007 .06
-
[자료논문 1] Moral grounds for gene technology
생명윤리
2007 .12
-
우리는 왜 초기 인간생명을 보호해야 하는가?
생명윤리
2005 .12
-
반도체산업에서의 인적오류제어방법 및 연구
대한안전경영과학회지
2006 .01
-
Human thought to create the future
International Digital Design Invitation Exhibition
2019 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-570-002509180