지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Environmental refugees are persons who can no longer gain a secure livelihood in their traditional homelands because of what are primarily environmental factors of unusual scope. Environmental refugees have three types such as ‘environmental refugees caused by their country’, ‘environmental refugees caused by foreign country’, and ‘climate refugees’.
The first question is whether international refugee law can protect ‘environmental refugees caused by their country’ or not. The definition of refugee set at 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees(hereinafter Refugee Convention) request three composing elements such as ‘persecution’, ‘to conform to one of five reasons of persecution’ and ‘persons being outside the country of his nationality or his former habitual residence’. Unfortunately, environmental refugees can not fill the first and second elements of Refugee Convention's definition.
Another legal solution for environmental refugees is the ‘Human Rights Based Approach’. A human rights-based approach is not only about expanding people’s choices and capabilities but above all about the empowerment of people to decide what this process of expansion should look like. Adopting a human rights based approach may not necessarily change what we do, but it will raise questions about how we do it. As we con-sider and adopt a human rights based approach to environmental refugees, it is possible to focus on their human rights disturbed and remedy to them as a victim.
A principle of ‘Common but Differentiated Responsibility’(hereinafter CDR) is necessary to solve problem of ‘Climate Refugees’. It has no legal subject responsible to cause the problem. differential responsibility of CDR does result in different legal obligations which is acceptable to each states, and request international material cooperation.
The first question is whether international refugee law can protect ‘environmental refugees caused by their country’ or not. The definition of refugee set at 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees(hereinafter Refugee Convention) request three composing elements such as ‘persecution’, ‘to conform to one of five reasons of persecution’ and ‘persons being outside the country of his nationality or his former habitual residence’. Unfortunately, environmental refugees can not fill the first and second elements of Refugee Convention's definition.
Another legal solution for environmental refugees is the ‘Human Rights Based Approach’. A human rights-based approach is not only about expanding people’s choices and capabilities but above all about the empowerment of people to decide what this process of expansion should look like. Adopting a human rights based approach may not necessarily change what we do, but it will raise questions about how we do it. As we con-sider and adopt a human rights based approach to environmental refugees, it is possible to focus on their human rights disturbed and remedy to them as a victim.
A principle of ‘Common but Differentiated Responsibility’(hereinafter CDR) is necessary to solve problem of ‘Climate Refugees’. It has no legal subject responsible to cause the problem. differential responsibility of CDR does result in different legal obligations which is acceptable to each states, and request international material cooperation.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 환경난민의 개념
Ⅲ. 환경난민과 국제난민법
Ⅳ. 환경난민과 인권 기반적 접근
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈Abstract〉
『국제법상 ‘환경난민‘에 대한 인권 기반적 접근」에 대한 토론문
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
난민의 인권 및 두려움의 쟁점
경찰학논총
2020 .01
-
난민의 개념과 그 보호
국제법학회논총
2007 .08
-
Humanitarian Crisis and Refugee Protection : Korea’s Response to Refugee Crisis
법학연구
2019 .09
-
환경난민의 법적 지위
국제법학회논총
2002 .12
-
한국에서의 난민여성의 삶과 인권
이화젠더법학
2018 .12
-
한국 난민정책의 문제점과 개선방안
정책개발연구
2015 .01
-
The Current State of Refugee, Refugee Law and Integration Policy in Korea
법학논총
2012 .06
-
독일의 난민사태에 대한 대응입법의 연구
법과정책
2017 .01
-
난민법 제정의 의의와 문제점
국제법학회논총
2012 .06
-
난민불인정자의 불복절차에 관한 연구
다문화사회연구
2019 .10
-
독일의 난민법 개혁의 현황과 시사점
유럽헌법연구
2017 .01
-
수의 정치 : 난민인정률의 국제비교
문화와 정치
2018 .12
-
우리나라 난민인정절차(難民認定節次)의 개선방안(改善方案)
중앙법학
2007 .08
-
1951년 난민의 지위에 관한 협약의 현대적 재조명 : 협약 외 난민 보호를 중심으로
인도법논총
2018 .12
-
동아시아의 난민법정책
저스티스
2017 .02
-
영국의 난민정책 : 시리아난민 사례를 중심으로
정치정보연구
2016 .06
-
국제인권법에서 바라본 단일 난민법 제정의 의의
저스티스
2009 .04
-
‘이주-비호의 연계성’ 담론과 난민보호 위기에 관한 정책적 고찰
민주주의와 인권
2015 .12
-
A Study on Expanded Refugee Concept for Large-scale Displacement Crises
외법논집
2018 .01
-
독일의 난민 수용과정에서 나타난 정책 변화의 연구
분쟁해결연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-360-002582165