지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study focuses on the foundation of Ahn Jung-geun’s inner world and the ultimate extent of his views concerning the Korean independence movement, war and peace in East Asia and the assassination of former Japanese Prime Minister, Ito Hirobumi and Ahn Jung Guen's death.
Over the past century, Ahn has been highly appraised as a symbol of the independence movement. His relevance today, however, has more to do with his thoughts on peace in East Asia than his contribution to the Korean independence movement. He was based on the principle of universal and inalienable human rights, and was critical of the aggressive policies employed by the upper crust of civilized nations which resulted in the death of countless individuals in weaker nations. This tragic reality is what motivated him to assassinate Ito Hirobumi.
However, there was something more important to Ahn than killing Ito. He wanted the assassination to get people to open their eyes to the importance of peace in East Asia. This peace envisioned by Ahn called for all nations to maintain an amicable and harmonious relationship founded on the independence and sovereignty of Korea and that of other weaker nations. He attached great importance to the emperor as a symbol of national sovereignty. However, the ultimate reach of his views always extended to the people and the international solidarity amongst them.
Ahn was a devout catholic, who naturally adhered to the commandment “Thou shalt not kill.” Accordingly, the greatest dilemma in his life was over the fact that his involvement in the independence war would entail the taking of human life. However, after long and thorough reflection, he concluded that his assassination of Ito would be an “act of war” he would carry out as a Korean “general” fighting in the war of independence and that this act would not conflict with his religious beliefs.
The final aspect Ahn Jung-geun agonized over during his lifetime was about how he was going to die. He believed that by dying righteously, he would be able to bring credibility to the cause of peace in East Asia and his reason for killing Ito. That is how he came to be deemed as a victor who passed judgment on Japan's aggressions and not as a defendant of his trial. Moreover, he was surprisingly at peace when he met his death, awing the Japanese officials. His last words were an entreaty to the Japanese asking for peace in East Asia.
Ahn Jung-geun, the assassin, thus turned into a righteous pacifist, impressing and inspiring even the Japanese. Moreover, in the early stages of the international peace movement in East Asia led by the likes of Leo Tolstoy, Ahn Jung-geun’s “Treatise of Peace in East Asia” was significant in that it represented the position not of a warring nation but of a victim nation. The “Treatise of Peace in East Asia” was all the more valuable given that through death, Ahn had validated its integrity. PEACE should be the starting point from which we should remember Ahn in the centennial of his righteous death.
Over the past century, Ahn has been highly appraised as a symbol of the independence movement. His relevance today, however, has more to do with his thoughts on peace in East Asia than his contribution to the Korean independence movement. He was based on the principle of universal and inalienable human rights, and was critical of the aggressive policies employed by the upper crust of civilized nations which resulted in the death of countless individuals in weaker nations. This tragic reality is what motivated him to assassinate Ito Hirobumi.
However, there was something more important to Ahn than killing Ito. He wanted the assassination to get people to open their eyes to the importance of peace in East Asia. This peace envisioned by Ahn called for all nations to maintain an amicable and harmonious relationship founded on the independence and sovereignty of Korea and that of other weaker nations. He attached great importance to the emperor as a symbol of national sovereignty. However, the ultimate reach of his views always extended to the people and the international solidarity amongst them.
Ahn was a devout catholic, who naturally adhered to the commandment “Thou shalt not kill.” Accordingly, the greatest dilemma in his life was over the fact that his involvement in the independence war would entail the taking of human life. However, after long and thorough reflection, he concluded that his assassination of Ito would be an “act of war” he would carry out as a Korean “general” fighting in the war of independence and that this act would not conflict with his religious beliefs.
The final aspect Ahn Jung-geun agonized over during his lifetime was about how he was going to die. He believed that by dying righteously, he would be able to bring credibility to the cause of peace in East Asia and his reason for killing Ito. That is how he came to be deemed as a victor who passed judgment on Japan's aggressions and not as a defendant of his trial. Moreover, he was surprisingly at peace when he met his death, awing the Japanese officials. His last words were an entreaty to the Japanese asking for peace in East Asia.
Ahn Jung-geun, the assassin, thus turned into a righteous pacifist, impressing and inspiring even the Japanese. Moreover, in the early stages of the international peace movement in East Asia led by the likes of Leo Tolstoy, Ahn Jung-geun’s “Treatise of Peace in East Asia” was significant in that it represented the position not of a warring nation but of a victim nation. The “Treatise of Peace in East Asia” was all the more valuable given that through death, Ahn had validated its integrity. PEACE should be the starting point from which we should remember Ahn in the centennial of his righteous death.
목차
머리말 : 안중근 100주년의 쟁점
1. 독립전쟁과 민족운동
2. 동양평화론
3. 죽임과 죽음
맺음말 : 새로운 출발을 위하여
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (20)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 조광 / 2000 / 안중근 연구의 현황과 과제 / 한국근현대사연구 12
2. [단행본] - 도진순 / 1997 / 백범일지(주해본) / 돌베개 : 50 ~ 54
3. [단행본] - 국사편찬위원회 / 1977 / 한국독립운동사 자료 / 국사편찬위원회 : 418 ~
4. [단행본] - 나카오 야스오 / 1995 / 동양평화의 사도 안중근 / 하소 : 49 ~ 50
5. [학술대회논문] - 나카오 야스오 / 2009 / 未完の東洋平和論: その思想水脈と可能性について / 안중근하얼빈학회 동북아역사재단 공동주최 안중근의거 100주년기념 국제학술대회
2. [단행본] - 도진순 / 1997 / 백범일지(주해본) / 돌베개 : 50 ~ 54
3. [단행본] - 국사편찬위원회 / 1977 / 한국독립운동사 자료 / 국사편찬위원회 : 418 ~
4. [단행본] - 나카오 야스오 / 1995 / 동양평화의 사도 안중근 / 하소 : 49 ~ 50
5. [학술대회논문] - 나카오 야스오 / 2009 / 未完の東洋平和論: その思想水脈と可能性について / 안중근하얼빈학회 동북아역사재단 공동주최 안중근의거 100주년기념 국제학술대회
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
안중근 가문의 유방백세와 망각지대
역사비평
2010 .02
-
안중근의거와 대동공보사의 관계에 대한 재검토
한국사연구
2010 .09
-
Russian and Japanese Diplomatic Responses on Interrogations Records of Ahn Jung-Geun
Korea Journal
2015 .06
-
도마 안중근 의병참모중장의 생애와 사상
대학과 복음
2009 .12
-
안중근을 보는 두 가지 시선 ― 남북한 영화가 재현해 낸 애국적 인물의 궤적 ―
인문콘텐츠
2003 .06
-
안중근과 일본인 : 동양평화의 실현을 위해
아시아문화연구
2010 .12
-
안중근의 하얼빈의거와 순국 100주년의 성찰 - 안중근 연구의 방향 -
군사연구
2010 .01
-
일제의 국외한인에 대한 사법권침탈과 안중근재판
한국사연구
2009 .09
-
안중근의거 배경과 「동양평화론」의 현대사적 의의 : 동아시아의 평화와 미래를 전망하며
한국독립운동사연구
2010 .08
-
동양평화론의 논의 기저와 역사상
역사와현실
2014 .12
-
안중근의 꿈 : 교육자, 독립투사, 평화운동가의 길
한국학연구
2018 .12
-
안중근의 정치체제 구상
한국독립운동사연구
2008 .12
-
Korea’s Movement to Settle the Issues of the Past and Peace in East Asia
Korea Journal
2010 .12
-
安重根의 ‘同義斷指會’의 補遺
한국독립운동사연구
2009 .04
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002248247