메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
윤난지 (이화여자대학교)
저널정보
한국미술연구소 미술사논단 美術史論壇 第29號
발행연도
2009.12
수록면
297 - 326 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The great transformation of science was a leading factor in making the 20th century the greatest period of transition in the history of Western civilization. The theory of the fourth dimension, based on the space-time continuum, brought about a change in worldview; the technological civilization engendered by the Industrial Revolution sparked a paradigm shift in all areas of life, and art was no exception. In particular, geometric abstraction, which led the Modernist art movement in the first half of the 20th century, manifested a positive view of science and technology through its forms as well as in its use of materials and techniques. The geometric forms, which were an illustration of the system of rational thinking, were a visual model that proposed a mode of scientific thinking through a progressive worldview; the industrial products and machines used as materials and tools here were symbols of an advanced civilization.
Those artists engaged in experimenting with these abstract forms were technocratic utopians who believed that science and technology would bring about an ideal society: Naum Gabo (1890~1977) and Laszlo Moholy-Nagy (1895~1946) were two of the main artists representing this tendency. But despite their shared utopianism, the two men showed different attitudes in their approaches. In terms of art, it was the plastic element of ‘movement’ that most embodied the new science theory and technological civilization. Both artists pursued ‘movement’ but employed different methods for realizing it.
Gabo created metaphors for movement mostly through visual effects and even when showing real movement, he hid the mechanical devices creating the movement, presenting only the pure forms as works of art. Meanwhile, Moholy-Nagy not only embraced engineering technology in creating movement, he also presented mechanical devices themselves as part of his artwork. If science for Gabo was a model of art and technology was merely its means, Moholy-Nagy regarded science and technology as art itself. While Gabo was an idealist who applied the scientific mode of thought to art, Moholy-Nagy was a positivist who set out to present technology as it was and merged it with the sphere of art.
Thus, the works of Gabo and Moholy-Nagy reveal the development of modern science as it transformed from idealism to positivism. Their works are like an artistic index unveiling the realities of an age in which science was inverted into technology. At the same time they call to mind the path of Modernism’s germination, abstract art. The works also foretell the history of how the world of perfect logic that Mondrian and other like-minded artists dreamed of in the early 20th century became reified into Kinetic Art or Minimalism in the latter part of the 20th century. This history of reversal, in which the art that was driven by a realm of ‘idea’ based on a scientific worldview represented by geometry is reverted by technology back into ‘reality’, into a world of commodities, is a warning that the West’s project of modernity, defined by a scientific worldview, may be a ‘decline’ and not an ‘evolution’.

목차

Ⅰ. 여는 글
Ⅱ. 과학적 사유의 모델로서의 조각: 나움 가보
Ⅲ. 과학기술로서의 미술: 라즐로 모홀리 나기
Ⅳ. 닫는 글
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-650-003382908