지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
After the Later-Han/後漢 dynasty collapsed, the Gongson-shi/公孫氏 regime newly came to present itself as the new ruler of the Liaodong/遼東 region. This kind of power shift dearly affected the internal stability of the Koguryo dynasty, as subordinate groups such as Sosumaek/小水貊 and Dongyae/東濊 started to waver, causing the region to be de-stabilized. Yet, the Three dynasties of China continued to fight each other viciously through the 220s, so they were in no position to launch a solid Eastern policy at the time. Thanks to the situation, the Gongson-shi regime was able to establish a strong power base throughout the region, without being interrupted.
On the other hand, Koguryo was out of diplomatic options to maintain the Gongson-shi regime in check. So, the Koguryo government chose to designate an emergency military defense fortress as the temporary capital city, and construct a series of mountain fortresses(山城) along the right side(右岸) of the Hun-jiang/渾江 river in a fairly concentrated fashion. These military efforts of defensive reinforcement were part of the overall response to the military threats of the Gongson-shi forces, but it was also meant to be utilized in maintaining internal security of the dynasty, keeping the subordinate groups in place.
Since the end of the 220s, the Oh dynasty ruled by the Son House('Son-Oh/孫吳') and the Chok-Han/蜀漢 dynasty formed an alliance('吳蜀同盟'), and immediately launched an aggressive Northern campaign. Especially the 'Son-Oh/孫吳' tried to launch a joint operation with the Gongson-shi House and attack the 'Joh-Wei/曹魏'(the Wei dynasty ruled by the Joh House). The Oh dynasty attempted to establish a military installation in the Liaodong region by dispatching a huge military there, but the sudden changes in the Gongson-shi House's position prevented the efforts from being ever implemented.
The relationship between Koguryo and Son-Oh was initiated, as several members of the Son-Oh delegation that was sent to visit the Gongson-shi regime fled to Koguryo asking for protection. At the time, the Son-Oh government was outraged by the betrayal of the Gongson-shi regime, so it was easy for Son-Oh to establish a joint front against the Gongson-shi regime with the Koguryo dynasty. But in 234, even before such diplomatic relationship between both entities had the opportunity to be settled, Jaegal-Ryang of the Chok-Han dynasty died, and his death seriously endangered the joint Northern campaign which was based upon the joint efforts of Chok-Han and Son-Oh.
Taking advantage of the situation, the Joh-Wei launched its own Eastern campaign. Apparently, Koguryo also favored such launch, as the Koguryo government beheaded the Son-Oh emissaries in 236, sent their heads to Joh-Wei, and joined the Joh-Wei dynasty's conquest of the Gongson-shi regime in 238. But Joh-Wei chose to pursue a separative-ruling policy even more strongly than the Gongson-shi regime. Such policy was a direct threat to the Koguryo security. In response to such threat, Koguryo launched a preemptive strike against the Seoanpyeong/西安平 region in 242. Joh-Wei also retaliated upon all fronts, and maintained the separative-ruling policy.
These series of events that happened during the early half period of the 3rd century, significantly changed the foreign policy of the Koguryo dynasty. But the Koguryo dynasty designed its own military defense system with taking the disturbances that might occur among the subordinate groups into account, and implemented it throughout the outskirts of the central, so Koguryo was able to restore control of the central areas, and deflect additional assaults of the Joh-Wei dynasty rather efficiently. Koguryo also took advantage of the situations when the foreign policies of Joh-Wei or West-Jin showed any weaknesses, to reinforce its control over the subordinate groups throughout the region.
On the other hand, Koguryo was out of diplomatic options to maintain the Gongson-shi regime in check. So, the Koguryo government chose to designate an emergency military defense fortress as the temporary capital city, and construct a series of mountain fortresses(山城) along the right side(右岸) of the Hun-jiang/渾江 river in a fairly concentrated fashion. These military efforts of defensive reinforcement were part of the overall response to the military threats of the Gongson-shi forces, but it was also meant to be utilized in maintaining internal security of the dynasty, keeping the subordinate groups in place.
Since the end of the 220s, the Oh dynasty ruled by the Son House('Son-Oh/孫吳') and the Chok-Han/蜀漢 dynasty formed an alliance('吳蜀同盟'), and immediately launched an aggressive Northern campaign. Especially the 'Son-Oh/孫吳' tried to launch a joint operation with the Gongson-shi House and attack the 'Joh-Wei/曹魏'(the Wei dynasty ruled by the Joh House). The Oh dynasty attempted to establish a military installation in the Liaodong region by dispatching a huge military there, but the sudden changes in the Gongson-shi House's position prevented the efforts from being ever implemented.
The relationship between Koguryo and Son-Oh was initiated, as several members of the Son-Oh delegation that was sent to visit the Gongson-shi regime fled to Koguryo asking for protection. At the time, the Son-Oh government was outraged by the betrayal of the Gongson-shi regime, so it was easy for Son-Oh to establish a joint front against the Gongson-shi regime with the Koguryo dynasty. But in 234, even before such diplomatic relationship between both entities had the opportunity to be settled, Jaegal-Ryang of the Chok-Han dynasty died, and his death seriously endangered the joint Northern campaign which was based upon the joint efforts of Chok-Han and Son-Oh.
Taking advantage of the situation, the Joh-Wei launched its own Eastern campaign. Apparently, Koguryo also favored such launch, as the Koguryo government beheaded the Son-Oh emissaries in 236, sent their heads to Joh-Wei, and joined the Joh-Wei dynasty's conquest of the Gongson-shi regime in 238. But Joh-Wei chose to pursue a separative-ruling policy even more strongly than the Gongson-shi regime. Such policy was a direct threat to the Koguryo security. In response to such threat, Koguryo launched a preemptive strike against the Seoanpyeong/西安平 region in 242. Joh-Wei also retaliated upon all fronts, and maintained the separative-ruling policy.
These series of events that happened during the early half period of the 3rd century, significantly changed the foreign policy of the Koguryo dynasty. But the Koguryo dynasty designed its own military defense system with taking the disturbances that might occur among the subordinate groups into account, and implemented it throughout the outskirts of the central, so Koguryo was able to restore control of the central areas, and deflect additional assaults of the Joh-Wei dynasty rather efficiently. Koguryo also took advantage of the situations when the foreign policies of Joh-Wei or West-Jin showed any weaknesses, to reinforce its control over the subordinate groups throughout the region.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 公孫氏 政權의 興起와 고구려의 대응책
Ⅲ. 孫吳ㆍ曹魏의 東方政策과 고구려의 대응
Ⅳ. 맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
長壽王代 高句麗의 對北魏外交와 百濟
한국고대사연구
2004 .12
-
高句麗와 北齊의 關係-552년 流入 送還의 문제를 중심으로-
한국고대사연구
2001 .09
-
漢과 高句麗의 關係
고구려발해연구
2002 .12
-
7세기 고구려 대왜(對倭) 관계의 변화 - 630년을 기점으로 -
역사와현실
2005 .09
-
韓國 史書에 나타난 高句麗의 正體性
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
고구려와 북방민족의 관계에 대한 중화인민공화국 학계의 견해
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
高麗의 高句麗 繼承意識
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
中國學界의 高句麗 對外關係史 硏究現況
한국고대사연구
2003 .09
-
[기획1 : 한ㆍ중 역사인식의 접점] 「광개토왕릉비」에 나타난 고구려의 대중인식(對中認識)과 대외정책
역사와현실
2005 .03
-
高句麗史
성곡논총
1997 .07
-
北方民族史에서 본 高句麗의 正體性 : 鮮卑, 契丹, 柔然을 중심으로
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
高句麗 古墳壁畵와 同時代 中國 北方民族 古墳美術과의 比較硏究
고구려발해연구
2007 .09
-
고구려 벽화를 통해서 본 고구려의 정체성 연구
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
중화인민공화국 학계의 고구려 유민 연구 검토
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
中國 內 高句麗遺蹟에서 出土된 高句麗土器 硏究
중국사연구
2007 .01
-
고구려 발해의 상관성 연구와 과제
고구려발해연구
2008 .07
-
唐朝의 高句麗人軍事集團
동북아역사논총
2009 .06
-
고구려 中期天下觀의 推移
고구려발해연구
2008 .03
-
고구려와 突厥의 전쟁
고구려발해연구
2006 .09
-
4~5세기 고구려에 유입된 중국계 인물의 동향-문헌자료를 중심으로-
한국고대사연구
2003 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002851588