지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to philosophically review the basic ideas and framework of thoughts outlined below which are used as premises by cultural researchers in the twenty-first century.
Culture in its entirety is facing global crisis. In this study, cultural crisis will be defined as an initial approach. Then, a paradox of its relation to the results of natural science's remarkable development will be presented. Thus, an attempt to provide ideas toward overcoming this cultural crisis while focusing on the concept of humanity will be explored, as it addresses related issues from the viewpoints of cultural philosophy, intercultural philosophy and neuro-ethics.
Cultural studies in the twenty-first century are confronted by complexity as the global expansion and diffusion of cultural phenomena have enhanced the ambiguities of its representation. The rapid expansion of industrialization has also contributed to the deconstruction of traditional culture. Thus, the roles of cultural experts have increased and undergone transformation. These circumstances paved way to backlash, criticism and resistance against global culture from a local viewpoint wired with ethnic and minority culture, while on the other hand, creating a trend toward mediation or new integration with globalism. A typical expression which can be attached is 'glocalism'. These trends have also resulted in various cultures crossing national boundaries.
Consequently, it is becoming increasingly difficult to provide a definitive answer to the question of what exactly culture or Asian culture is. Additionally in today's cultural studies, it is necessary to take the aforementioned cultural complexity into consideration to look into a wide variety of individual cultural phenomena from a broad perspective. This study examines the relationship between the challenge of cultural crisis and neuro-ethics which deals with the study of ethical considerations in neuroscience and brain science.
This paper therefore seeks to illuminate the truth of a paradox that seriously challenges the traditional view of human beings and human nature based on which such a view is developed. Cultural studies, now face major challenges like the flagging of traditional cultures, the increased cultural fragmentation or complexity which are becoming more serious globally among peoples - particularly among minorities - irrespective of origin and economic background.
In view of cultural ambiguities, developments from the field of Philosophy, Science and Technology, are intended to give light to the very nature of our own cultural experience, as these critiques need to further clarify such ambiguity by pointing out dangers and crises. Such work should play an increasingly important role in securing humanity which serves as the foundation of culture, and in promoting sound development in more specific branches like morals, ethics, law, etc.
As an implication, cultural studies in the twenty-first century becomes increasingly important to actively promote research on cultural phenomena from complex viewpoints such as global, local and glocal ways of thinking.
Culture in its entirety is facing global crisis. In this study, cultural crisis will be defined as an initial approach. Then, a paradox of its relation to the results of natural science's remarkable development will be presented. Thus, an attempt to provide ideas toward overcoming this cultural crisis while focusing on the concept of humanity will be explored, as it addresses related issues from the viewpoints of cultural philosophy, intercultural philosophy and neuro-ethics.
Cultural studies in the twenty-first century are confronted by complexity as the global expansion and diffusion of cultural phenomena have enhanced the ambiguities of its representation. The rapid expansion of industrialization has also contributed to the deconstruction of traditional culture. Thus, the roles of cultural experts have increased and undergone transformation. These circumstances paved way to backlash, criticism and resistance against global culture from a local viewpoint wired with ethnic and minority culture, while on the other hand, creating a trend toward mediation or new integration with globalism. A typical expression which can be attached is 'glocalism'. These trends have also resulted in various cultures crossing national boundaries.
Consequently, it is becoming increasingly difficult to provide a definitive answer to the question of what exactly culture or Asian culture is. Additionally in today's cultural studies, it is necessary to take the aforementioned cultural complexity into consideration to look into a wide variety of individual cultural phenomena from a broad perspective. This study examines the relationship between the challenge of cultural crisis and neuro-ethics which deals with the study of ethical considerations in neuroscience and brain science.
This paper therefore seeks to illuminate the truth of a paradox that seriously challenges the traditional view of human beings and human nature based on which such a view is developed. Cultural studies, now face major challenges like the flagging of traditional cultures, the increased cultural fragmentation or complexity which are becoming more serious globally among peoples - particularly among minorities - irrespective of origin and economic background.
In view of cultural ambiguities, developments from the field of Philosophy, Science and Technology, are intended to give light to the very nature of our own cultural experience, as these critiques need to further clarify such ambiguity by pointing out dangers and crises. Such work should play an increasingly important role in securing humanity which serves as the foundation of culture, and in promoting sound development in more specific branches like morals, ethics, law, etc.
As an implication, cultural studies in the twenty-first century becomes increasingly important to actively promote research on cultural phenomena from complex viewpoints such as global, local and glocal ways of thinking.
목차
1. 문제제기
2. 문화의 위기와 문화연구의 과제
3. 포스트 콜로니얼리즘과 전통적 인간관의 위기
4. 뇌신경과학과 ‘인간성’의 해체
5. ‘인간성’과 ‘문화’의 재구축을 향하여
6. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
문화 커뮤니케이션의 구조
대동철학
2005 .01
-
문화철학과 문화학
철학탐구
2005 .05
-
패션 산업의 변화와 한국적 이미지
비교민속학
2004 .08
-
고구려의 문화상품 디자인 콘텐츠 개발
고구려발해연구
2008 .07
-
Problems in Korean Cultural Research
Korea Journal
1990 .09
-
다문화교육 관점에서 현행 중학교 9종 역사교과서 고려시대 단원 분석 -2009(2011) 개정 교육과정을 중심으로-
대구사학
2013 .01
-
언어적 및 비언어적 문화차이로 인한 의사소통장애에 관한 연구 -한・미간의 문화를 중심으로-
영어영문학연구
2012 .01
-
이명박 정부 이후 문화정책의 변화와 문화민주주의에 대한 연구 : 이명박 정부의 문화정책 평가를 중심으로
인문콘텐츠
2014 .03
-
다문화시대의 문화교육과 국어/문학교육 : 김수영의 시 「거대한 뿌리」 비평교육의 경우
우리말글
2008 .04
-
한국 지역문화정책의 한계와 과제
한국사상과 문화
2016 .01
-
우리나라 전통 문화 정책의 전개 과정과 그 의미
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2000 .12
-
문화, 문화학, 문화철학
사회와 철학
2004 .04
-
중국 지역 문화의 문화브랜드화 현상연구-山西省 『又見平遙』공연을 중심으로-
외국학연구
2015 .01
-
From Cultural Frames to Cultural Turn in Translation Studies
통번역교육연구
2013 .01
-
문화콘텐츠화 사업에서 '문화원형' 개념의 함의와 한계
인문콘텐츠
2005 .12
-
문화민주주의와 프랑스의 문화예술 지원정책 : 문화 축제를 중심으로
프랑스어권 문화예술연구
2017 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-910-002376438