지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.6
- 수록면
- 233 - 270 (38page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Every man that searches for spiritual evolution cannot get to the highest state of wisdom without facing the inner-self. Shakespeare's tragedies, King Lear, Macbeth, Hamlet show that tragic heroes should live lives of suffering and ignorance because of the failure of seeing through into the self wrapped with every kind of illusion. They also show how much more a hard job it is that a man should make a ethical choice via self-awareness. Nevertheless, they teach that the hardship is the crucial key to keep man from falling into the state of beast as well.
In King Lear, seemingly trivial faults in the relationship between Lear and Cordelia prove to get to the fatal catastrophe, for actions are taken without the knowledge of true self. Lear's tragedy is brought about by the failure of finding the true cause of his wrath in himself, which energy is uncontrollable to him. Cordelia's hatred towards her sisters who talkatively pay lip services to their father-king in order to 'draw' their fortunes provokes her habit of teaching, which has Lear possessed with the storm of wrath. Lear refuses to be taught. The sense of 'being taught' drives him to madness. Lear must have felt the sense of inferiority for he thinks a king should not be taught. The dragon's wrath is touched by the teaching daughter Cordelia who would not acknowledge that her hatred is caused by refusing the inner desire to take an action the same as her sisters do. So she takes herself for an angel. This is the story of persons who fail in achieving self-knowledge and about a king whose mind is so empty as to deny the whole being as a king.
We can find in Macbeth another king who has never thought of what a king is. When he murders Duncan, Macbeth hesitates because of lack of just cause. His act of bloody slaughter in the battle is applauded as a brave deed to save the state just because it wins the good cause. Finally Macbeth becomes the victim of an illusion that he qualified himself to be a king. To achieve a goal, Macbeth doesn't tell good from bad and takes a shortcut to the gold crown. But once he has won the goal, he cannot live a happy life for he is not ready for being a king. Malcom says that he has no qualities of good king in himself and so if he were to be a king, he will be of great danger to the peace of the state. Malcom's clear insight into his own nature will make him a good king and at least tell to himself that he should make a transcendental choice for he has found out a wide gap between his nature and what a true king is. Macbeth has no choice but to get to the self-destruction for he has never faced into his true nature, which is full of bloody-mindedness and cowardice.
We can find three persons, in Hamlet, who are placed in an similar situation and show different responses in their act. Fortinbras, Laertes, Hamlet have the good cause of revenge. Laertes has gathered a mob of rioters and invaded to the Elsinore under the just cause of revenge for his father. He, however, chooses to plot against Hamlet, for he has to hide his desire to make the best of an opportunity and become a king. Fortinbras, taking advantage of the given cause, never hesitates to satisfy his desire. He never hides what he wants like Hamlet and Laertes do. Hamlet always covers up his desire and his way of doing with many excuses and gets pale with ethical agony: 'whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or take arms against sea of trouble, and by opposing end them'. Hamlet must have felt charms at Fortinbras' resolute action totally different from his own one. Hamlet sometimes does something rashly and unexpectedly and makes every effort to take his revenge, which causes fatal catastrophe for he does not face what he really wants in himself. After he returns to Denmark from the way to England, he finally finds out the real cause of his action. Hamlet realizes that he wants to kill his uncle who has 'kill'd his king and whored his mother,/ Popp'd in between the election and his hopes,/ Thrown out his(Claudius') angle for his proper life', not to revenge for his father. Hamlet has become frank to himself and accepted the design of providence. But He cannot make transcendental choice, for he never gives up his desire to kill his uncle.
In King Lear, seemingly trivial faults in the relationship between Lear and Cordelia prove to get to the fatal catastrophe, for actions are taken without the knowledge of true self. Lear's tragedy is brought about by the failure of finding the true cause of his wrath in himself, which energy is uncontrollable to him. Cordelia's hatred towards her sisters who talkatively pay lip services to their father-king in order to 'draw' their fortunes provokes her habit of teaching, which has Lear possessed with the storm of wrath. Lear refuses to be taught. The sense of 'being taught' drives him to madness. Lear must have felt the sense of inferiority for he thinks a king should not be taught. The dragon's wrath is touched by the teaching daughter Cordelia who would not acknowledge that her hatred is caused by refusing the inner desire to take an action the same as her sisters do. So she takes herself for an angel. This is the story of persons who fail in achieving self-knowledge and about a king whose mind is so empty as to deny the whole being as a king.
We can find in Macbeth another king who has never thought of what a king is. When he murders Duncan, Macbeth hesitates because of lack of just cause. His act of bloody slaughter in the battle is applauded as a brave deed to save the state just because it wins the good cause. Finally Macbeth becomes the victim of an illusion that he qualified himself to be a king. To achieve a goal, Macbeth doesn't tell good from bad and takes a shortcut to the gold crown. But once he has won the goal, he cannot live a happy life for he is not ready for being a king. Malcom says that he has no qualities of good king in himself and so if he were to be a king, he will be of great danger to the peace of the state. Malcom's clear insight into his own nature will make him a good king and at least tell to himself that he should make a transcendental choice for he has found out a wide gap between his nature and what a true king is. Macbeth has no choice but to get to the self-destruction for he has never faced into his true nature, which is full of bloody-mindedness and cowardice.
We can find three persons, in Hamlet, who are placed in an similar situation and show different responses in their act. Fortinbras, Laertes, Hamlet have the good cause of revenge. Laertes has gathered a mob of rioters and invaded to the Elsinore under the just cause of revenge for his father. He, however, chooses to plot against Hamlet, for he has to hide his desire to make the best of an opportunity and become a king. Fortinbras, taking advantage of the given cause, never hesitates to satisfy his desire. He never hides what he wants like Hamlet and Laertes do. Hamlet always covers up his desire and his way of doing with many excuses and gets pale with ethical agony: 'whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or take arms against sea of trouble, and by opposing end them'. Hamlet must have felt charms at Fortinbras' resolute action totally different from his own one. Hamlet sometimes does something rashly and unexpectedly and makes every effort to take his revenge, which causes fatal catastrophe for he does not face what he really wants in himself. After he returns to Denmark from the way to England, he finally finds out the real cause of his action. Hamlet realizes that he wants to kill his uncle who has 'kill'd his king and whored his mother,/ Popp'd in between the election and his hopes,/ Thrown out his(Claudius') angle for his proper life', not to revenge for his father. Hamlet has become frank to himself and accepted the design of providence. But He cannot make transcendental choice, for he never gives up his desire to kill his uncle.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Choice
Korea Journal
1986 .12
-
『햄릿』 : 분열된 욕망과 복수의 정치학
Shakespeare Review
2011 .06
-
햄릿의 허무주의
Shakespeare Review
2006 .03
-
비극적 갈등의 의미와 Shakespeare의 비극 : Hamlet을 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
1986 .08
-
영국 르네상스 복수비극의 전복적 욕망
Shakespeare Review
2010 .12
-
Shakespeare 비극의 구조 : 초기비극을 중심으로
새한영어영문학
1981 .09
-
A Critical Examination of the Tragedy of Hamlet
통일인문학
1979 .08
-
TV드라마에 나타난 선택의 스토리텔링 - 다중인격의 등장인물을 중심으로 -
한국문학논총
2018 .01
-
対称詞のバリエ-ションをめぐる研究の現状と展望 : 複文化 · 複言語を射程に入れた日本語教育からのアプロ-チ
일어일문학
2018 .11
-
『햄릿』의 불교적 해석 - 복수와 자아
Shakespeare Review
2000 .03
-
Desiring my Father's Death : Fathers and Children in Shakespeare
신영어영문학회 학술발표회 자료집
2000 .02
-
『햄릿』과 셰익스피어 비극의 정치성
Shakespeare Review
2006 .12
-
‘선험’⋅‘선천’⋅‘초월’
철학사상
2020 .02
-
셰익스피어 비극의 시간 인식
동서문화
1997 .02
-
욕망의 소설교육적 의미 탐구
국어문학
2017 .03
-
권리의 문제와 초월철학의 쇄신- 후설, 사르트르, 메를로-퐁티 -
철학논집
2020 .01
-
셰익스피어 비극의 역사성 : 『리어왕』을 중심으로
한신논문집
1996 .11
-
햄릿에서 셰익스피어의 관객 통제
고전 르네상스 영문학
2015 .01
-
셰퍼의 Yonadab에 나타난 왜곡된 초월적 욕구
현대영미드라마
2008 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003077940