지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2002.6
- 수록면
- 491 - 512 (22page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This essay discusses how Shakespeare criticizes Tudor doctrine in his own dramatic context and also examines how he endorses the rule of law in a way to provide a substitute for the criticized doctrine. By discussing the concept of the king's two bodies in relation to the above, this essay will also prove that Shakespeare's second tetralogy written in the 1590s shapes the form of the English polity-the constitutional monarchy in the next century.
Shakespeare indirectly denies the validity of Tudor doctrine through dramatic action rather than directly attacks the doctrine. He seems to find the political alternative from the rule of law while presenting the wrongs of Tudor political doctrine by means of drama. In line with the evolution of the contemporary Parliament, Shakespeare endorses a mixed monarchy in which the Crown is limited by Parliament, emphasizing that the rule of law is the quality necessary for the next king through his drama.
The concept of the king's two bodies, on the other hand, was a legal fiction formed in the twelfth century and widely circulated in the sixteenth century. Royalists used the concept of "the king's two bodies" for the purpose of propaganda in order to emphasize divine kingship. For them the king's two bodies were indivisible. They argued that "king can do no wrong" since his body politik mysteriously subsumed his body natural. In the time of Civil War parliamentarians urged the division of the two bodies. They called the army under the name and authority of Charles I, the body politik, against the same Charles Stuart, the body natural. Appropriating the concept of king's two bodies in their own way, parliamentarians justified their opposition against Charles I. Furthermore, based on this logic they executed Charles the natural man in the name of king. Interestingly, we can see the process of division of two bodies in Shakespeare's second tetralogy written 50 years before the Civil War. It is worth noting that in the development of the English polity, Shakespeare's second tetralogy rehearsed the process of the division of the king's two bodies, thereby shaping the constitutional monarchy the English people would have in the second half of the seventeenth century.
Shakespeare indirectly denies the validity of Tudor doctrine through dramatic action rather than directly attacks the doctrine. He seems to find the political alternative from the rule of law while presenting the wrongs of Tudor political doctrine by means of drama. In line with the evolution of the contemporary Parliament, Shakespeare endorses a mixed monarchy in which the Crown is limited by Parliament, emphasizing that the rule of law is the quality necessary for the next king through his drama.
The concept of the king's two bodies, on the other hand, was a legal fiction formed in the twelfth century and widely circulated in the sixteenth century. Royalists used the concept of "the king's two bodies" for the purpose of propaganda in order to emphasize divine kingship. For them the king's two bodies were indivisible. They argued that "king can do no wrong" since his body politik mysteriously subsumed his body natural. In the time of Civil War parliamentarians urged the division of the two bodies. They called the army under the name and authority of Charles I, the body politik, against the same Charles Stuart, the body natural. Appropriating the concept of king's two bodies in their own way, parliamentarians justified their opposition against Charles I. Furthermore, based on this logic they executed Charles the natural man in the name of king. Interestingly, we can see the process of division of two bodies in Shakespeare's second tetralogy written 50 years before the Civil War. It is worth noting that in the development of the English polity, Shakespeare's second tetralogy rehearsed the process of the division of the king's two bodies, thereby shaping the constitutional monarchy the English people would have in the second half of the seventeenth century.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
셰익스피어와 영국의 법적 통치 전통 : 로마 사극과 그 역사적 문맥
Shakespeare Review
2003 .12
-
Shakespeare In Korea
Shakespeare Review
2002 .09
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
Colonial Shakespeares : Shakespeare in Korea, 1906-1945
Shakespeare Review
1997 .12
-
19세기 아동 문학 풍토와 램 남매의 『셰익스피어 이야기』각색 연구
Shakespeare Review
2017 .03
-
Shakespeare`s Dramatic Design
영어영문학
2005 .12
-
민족시인의 형성 : 왕정복고기와 18세기 영국의 셰익스피어
Shakespeare Review
2015 .09
-
Shakespeare연구의 성과
비평문학
1990 .09
-
한국에서의 Shakespeare 연구 조사(Ⅱ)
Shakespeare Review
1995 .06
-
Shakespeare in Japanese
Shakespeare Review
2002 .09
-
셰익스피어의 극과 음악
새한영어영문학
2012 .02
-
『리차드 2세』: 왕의 말과 왕의 트라우마, 그리고 왕권
신영어영문학
2013 .11
-
셰익스피어 부흥과 여성 관객의 역할—“셰익스피어 레이디스 클럽”
영어영문학21
2012 .01
-
The Changing Images of Shakespeare and Writing in Shakespeare in Love (1998)
Shakespeare Review
2019 .06
-
Shakespeare극중 초자연적 요소의 고찰
비평문학
1991 .10
-
On Teaching Shakespeare
Shakespeare Review
2016 .09
-
18세기 셰익스피어 : 영국 국가영웅 이미지
Shakespeare Review
2007 .03
-
셰익스피어와 1990년대 이후 미국 대중문화 : 『윌 파워!』에서 『햄릿의 블랙베리』까지 자기계발서를 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
2013 .03
-
Computer에 의한 Shakespeare연구와 국제협력
Shakespeare Review
1972 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
『리차드 3세』: 튜더(전통적) 역사관에 대한 패러디
강석주
Shakespeare Review
2003
.12
헨리 8세의 개혁과 수도원 해산
박흥식
역사학보
2012
.06
셰익스피어와 정의 : 『타이터스 앤드로니커스』를 중심으로
서길수
신영어영문학
2012
.08
『리처드 3세』영상화에 나타난 시각의 차이 : 론크레인의 〈리처드 3세〉와 알파치노의 〈리처드를 찾아서〉
강석주
Shakespeare Review
2012
.06
이영석 著, 『공장의 역사: 근대 영국사회와 생산, 언어, 정치』, 푸른역사, 2012 : 근대 세계를 연 기계와 인간의 어울림 : 공장과 그에 얽힌 이야기들
李來珠
역사교육
2012
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003107029