지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Today, the Korean society is experiencing serious threats to democracy. In this article, in order to gain a new understanding of the Koreans' efforts that began in the past and is still going on today toward democratization, the legacy of the National Liberation movements that continued during the Japanese occupation period will be examined.
The National Liberation movement during the Japanese occupation period had a plan and prospect for the government that would be built after the liberation. In terms of creating a political format, both the Socialists and the Nationalists were aiming for a democratic republic, where all the citizens'(or the people's) freedom and rights would be protected and secured. And in terms of establishing an economy, they pursued neither a totally Communist system nor a Capitalist system, but a system which could ensure the least amount of equality, by the government's nationalizing lands and major corporations. Such legacy of the National Liberation movement transformed into several ideas regarding the new nation's Constitution right after the liberation, and finally led to the 'First Constitution.'
The First Constitution was a concise, albeit imperfect, plan for democracy that should be established in the area of politics, society and economy, and that was generally agreed upon by factions involved in the National Liberation efforts, including the Korean Provisional government. That was why 'equality' was presented as the primary value to be pursued by the new nation in both the foreword and main section of the first Constitution. Yet with the unfolding of the Korean war, anti-Communist sentiment got stronger than ever, and the progressive nature of the First Constitution was severely weakened, while the format itself still remained an impressive one.
The problem today is that such spirit of the Constitution is not being fully abided by in the lives of the ordinary people. The objective of the Democratization efforts has been to revive the ideas and ideals of the First Constitution. As long as the people engaged in such efforts try to invite a society where the people's freedom, rights and equality would be ensured, which was also the aim of the National Liberation front in the past, then democratization efforts could be labelled as the 'successor' to the National Liberation movement of the Japanese occupation period.
The National Liberation movement during the Japanese occupation period had a plan and prospect for the government that would be built after the liberation. In terms of creating a political format, both the Socialists and the Nationalists were aiming for a democratic republic, where all the citizens'(or the people's) freedom and rights would be protected and secured. And in terms of establishing an economy, they pursued neither a totally Communist system nor a Capitalist system, but a system which could ensure the least amount of equality, by the government's nationalizing lands and major corporations. Such legacy of the National Liberation movement transformed into several ideas regarding the new nation's Constitution right after the liberation, and finally led to the 'First Constitution.'
The First Constitution was a concise, albeit imperfect, plan for democracy that should be established in the area of politics, society and economy, and that was generally agreed upon by factions involved in the National Liberation efforts, including the Korean Provisional government. That was why 'equality' was presented as the primary value to be pursued by the new nation in both the foreword and main section of the first Constitution. Yet with the unfolding of the Korean war, anti-Communist sentiment got stronger than ever, and the progressive nature of the First Constitution was severely weakened, while the format itself still remained an impressive one.
The problem today is that such spirit of the Constitution is not being fully abided by in the lives of the ordinary people. The objective of the Democratization efforts has been to revive the ideas and ideals of the First Constitution. As long as the people engaged in such efforts try to invite a society where the people's freedom, rights and equality would be ensured, which was also the aim of the National Liberation front in the past, then democratization efforts could be labelled as the 'successor' to the National Liberation movement of the Japanese occupation period.
목차
머리말
1. 민족해방운동의 이념적 지향
2. 일제강점말기 민족통일전선과 건국구상
3. 민주화운동, 대한민국 헌법, 그리고 민족해방운동
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
3 · 1운동사 연구의 최근 동향과 방향성
역사와현실
2018 .12
-
해방전후의 민족통합운동
한국독립운동사연구
1998 .12
-
The Nature and Process of the Korean National Liberation Movement during the Japanese Colonial Period
Korea Journal
1996 .03
-
일제시대 민족해방운동의 통일전선운동
한국독립운동사연구
1998 .12
-
해방 직전 미주 한인의 독립운동과 미국 정부의 대응
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2002 .09
-
해방 직후 소설에 나타난 '민족'개념 형성 고찰
한국현대문학연구
2003 .06
-
Women`s Liberation in Korea
Korea Journal
1977 .07
-
3ㆍ1운동과 국내 공산주의 계열의 민족해방운동 : 일제시기 조선인 공산주의자들의 ‘역사 만들기’
한국독립운동사연구
1999 .12
-
왜곡된 87년체제 : 『민주화의 길』 분석을 중심으로
역사비평
2017 .05
-
Human Liberation in Early Modern Korean Thought
Korea Journal
1998 .09
-
Revisions of the Korean Constitution (Ⅱ)
Korea Journal
1974 .08
-
Revisions of the Korean Constitution (Ⅰ)
Korea Journal
1974 .07
-
대한민국 헌법의 임시정부 계승성
한국독립운동사연구
2012 .12
-
일제하 언양지역 민족해방운동의 성장과 발전
역사와 세계
2005 .08
-
광복 60년, 여성입법운동의 전개와 성과
여성과역사
2006 .01
-
일제하 소안도 민족해방운동가의 수용가 전승
비교민속학
2004 .02
-
한국의 민주화운동에 대한 재평가: 동원화와 국가의 연성화
한국시민윤리학회보
2010 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
왜 한국의 20대는 저항하지 않는가? : OECD 13개국 20대의 사회자본과 사회운동 간 상관관계 연구
서형준
한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집
2012
.12
유신선포 40주년, 생활과 정치에 대한 성찰
홍석률
역사와현실
2012
.09
4세기 후반~5세기 초엽 고구려(高句麗)와 백제(百濟)의 국경 변천
여호규
역사와현실
2012
.06
김정은시대 북한의 정책 전망과 남북관계
정창현
역사와현실
2012
.06
식민지 근대화론을 발본적으로 비판한 생산적 논쟁의 전범 : 허수열, 『일제초기 조선의 농업』(한길사, 2011)
정연태
역사와현실
2012
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-003636667