지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines the dynamic causal relationship between delinquent peer associations and delinquent behaviors using Youth panel data with three waves.
Delinquent peer association is known as a factor which has the strongest relationship with delinquent behavior. However, causal relationship between delinquent behavior and delinquent peer association have been controversial for a long time in criminology. There are three kinds of explanations about the relationship. Firstly, lots of researchers think that delinquent peer association is causally related to delinquent behaviors. Youths are more likely to commit delinquent behavior if they are associated with delinquent friends. Differential association theory, learning theory and group process theory share this approach. Secondly, some researchers provide opposite causal explanation. Control and propensity theories argue that delinquent peers do not cause delinquent behavior. Instead, the correlation between delinquent peers and delinquent behavior is said to be spurious, due to social selection(reverse causality), individual heterogeneity(attributes of individuals that select for both peers and behavior). Thirdly, interactional theory combine the causality hypothesis with the social selection hypothesis. Interactional theory explicitly emphasizes reciprocal effects between delinquent peers and delinquent behaviors. According to this theory, delinquent peer associations predict future delinquency, and delinquency increases the likelihood of association with delinquent peers.
For this analysis three year youth panel data produced by Korea Institute for Youth Development was used. LISREL method was used for the analysis of causal relationship between delinquent peers and delinquent behavior.
The major findings are as follows:
1) In status offense, such as smoking, drinking, truancy, and runaway, delinquent peer associations do not cause status offenses, but status offenses are likely to increase the level of delinquent peer association next year. This result shows that social selection hypothesis is valid for status offense.
2) But in criminal offense, such as assault, robbery, theft, and etc, opposite causal relationship was founded. Delinquent peer association has a significant effect to criminal offenses next year, but criminal offenses do not have a significant effect or weak effect to delinquent peer association. This result means that causation hypothesis is valid for criminal offense.
As seen above, different kinds of causal relationship were found in status offense and criminal offense. This results show all hypothesis are partially supported in this analysis, and suggest that more precious analysis should be conducted to explore the causal relationship between delinquent peer and delinquent behaviors in Korea.
Delinquent peer association is known as a factor which has the strongest relationship with delinquent behavior. However, causal relationship between delinquent behavior and delinquent peer association have been controversial for a long time in criminology. There are three kinds of explanations about the relationship. Firstly, lots of researchers think that delinquent peer association is causally related to delinquent behaviors. Youths are more likely to commit delinquent behavior if they are associated with delinquent friends. Differential association theory, learning theory and group process theory share this approach. Secondly, some researchers provide opposite causal explanation. Control and propensity theories argue that delinquent peers do not cause delinquent behavior. Instead, the correlation between delinquent peers and delinquent behavior is said to be spurious, due to social selection(reverse causality), individual heterogeneity(attributes of individuals that select for both peers and behavior). Thirdly, interactional theory combine the causality hypothesis with the social selection hypothesis. Interactional theory explicitly emphasizes reciprocal effects between delinquent peers and delinquent behaviors. According to this theory, delinquent peer associations predict future delinquency, and delinquency increases the likelihood of association with delinquent peers.
For this analysis three year youth panel data produced by Korea Institute for Youth Development was used. LISREL method was used for the analysis of causal relationship between delinquent peers and delinquent behavior.
The major findings are as follows:
1) In status offense, such as smoking, drinking, truancy, and runaway, delinquent peer associations do not cause status offenses, but status offenses are likely to increase the level of delinquent peer association next year. This result shows that social selection hypothesis is valid for status offense.
2) But in criminal offense, such as assault, robbery, theft, and etc, opposite causal relationship was founded. Delinquent peer association has a significant effect to criminal offenses next year, but criminal offenses do not have a significant effect or weak effect to delinquent peer association. This result means that causation hypothesis is valid for criminal offense.
As seen above, different kinds of causal relationship were found in status offense and criminal offense. This results show all hypothesis are partially supported in this analysis, and suggest that more precious analysis should be conducted to explore the causal relationship between delinquent peer and delinquent behaviors in Korea.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 비행친구와 비행행동의 인과성에 대한 이론적 논의
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 분석결과
Ⅴ. 맺는말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (18)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1993 / 친구와 비행간의 관계에 관한 연구 15 : 5 ~ 44
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2006 / 구조방정식모형
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1999 / 비행친구와 비행의 관계: 통합론적 논의를 중심으로 10 (2) : 193 ~ 221
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1994 / Criminological Theories: Introduction and Evaluation
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1979 / Social learning and deviant behavior: A general test of a specific theory 44 : 635 ~ 655
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2006 / 구조방정식모형
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1999 / 비행친구와 비행의 관계: 통합론적 논의를 중심으로 10 (2) : 193 ~ 221
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1994 / Criminological Theories: Introduction and Evaluation
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1979 / Social learning and deviant behavior: A general test of a specific theory 44 : 635 ~ 655
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
가정, 비행친구, 비행의 상호인과관계
형사정책연구
2002 .03
-
Now and Future of the 'Pre-delinquent' System in Japan : We should give up the idea of 'pre-delinquent', or not?
강원법학
1996 .11
-
지역사회 범죄 수준과 부모 양육태도가 비행친구관계에 미치는 영향
한국청소년연구
2020 .05
-
잠재계층분석(LCA)을 이용한 청소년-또래 비행의 유형과 특성
아동학회지
2017 .04
-
청소년 비행 발달 과정에 관한 연구 : Thornberry의 상호작용 모델의 검증
한국청소년연구
2013 .08
-
청소년 비행발전의 영향요인 : 비행친구와 자아통제의 영향을 중심으로
한국청소년연구
2009 .08
-
청소년의 스트레스와 사회적 지원 및 부적응
아동학회지
1995 .06
-
일반청소년과 비행청소년이 지각한 가족기능도와 그에 따른 스트레스 대처방식
가족과 문화
2004 .01
-
가정, 비행친구, 비행의 상호 인과관계에 대한 발전론적 연구 : 숀베리 모델의 부분 검증
한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집
2008 .12
-
낮은 자기통제력과 비행친구의 청소년비행에의 영향 : 청소년패널자료의 분석
한국청소년연구
2007 .08
-
비행청소년과 일반청소년의 사이버일탈행동에 대한 비교연구 - 청소년들의 긴장이 사이버비행에 미치는 영향을 중심으로 -
한국경찰연구
2020 .01
-
The Impact of Neighborhood Settings on Peer Risks among Delinquent Adolescents
International Journal of Human Ecology
2010 .01
-
비행행동의 발달궤적 및 영향요인
아동학회지
2009 .10
-
청소년기의 비행친구 선택과 영향에 대한 종단연구 : 지속효과와 최신효과
한국청소년연구
2008 .02
-
청소년 비행과 비행친구의 인과관계에 대한 자기회귀 교차지연 모델의 검증
한국청소년연구
2009 .02
-
초기 비행청소년과 후기 비행청소년의 비행경로 비교 : 비행친구, 부모애착, 자기통제를 중심으로
한국청소년연구
2010 .05
-
청소년 비행과 비행친구 간 상호효과: 정서문제를 통제한 교차지연 패널모형 검증
한국경찰학회보
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003969540