개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Korean literature has groped for the possibility of different modernity from Western modernity; it schemed and pursued ‘plural modernity’ as a generic term for non-capitalist modern enhancement to stress the distinctiveness and multiplicity of modernity holding out against ‘singular modernity.’
What must not be disregarded in the pursuit of ‘plural modernity’ Korean literature has achieved up to now is, however, the pursuit of ‘plural modernity,’ which was investigated within the nation-state, the Republic of Korea; that is, within the framework of one individual nation’s crisis. Korea openly underwent the fictitiousness of such a framework of one single nation’s crisis by way of the IMF. Hence, despotism of the neoliberalist order deviated from a nation’s boundary and loomed large as a critical-pending question of the entire global crisis, ‘plural modernity’ Korean literature must pursue, has since confronted multifarious dilemmas that cannot be resolved by only a nation’s viewpoint. A sensitive issue in the Korean society among the dilemmas concerns the reality of foreign migrant workers. Korean literature in the previous viewpoint of a nation was to deal successfully with ‘singular modernity’ that centered in the Western society, which has perceived the critical reality of foreign migrant workers in Korea and revealed contradictions and ills of Korean capitalism. Korean literature desires a global reform to achieve the class liberation of workers as resolving the dilemmas. The scheme for pursuing ‘plural modernity’ setting about within such a boundary of a nation extends to the issue of foreign migrant workers, the severity of which gradually rises within the global boundary of the neoliberalist order.
Korean literature is hence confronted with a new assignment. The rapid influx of foreign migrant workers to the Korean society cannot be disregarded, and Korean literature must never overlook the agony in their life in the Korean society. The reality of their life becomes conscious in our life in this global system of the 21st century capitalism. The pursuit of ‘plural modernity’ in Korean literature in the interest of overcoming European-centered ‘singular modernity’ can allow a deviation from the boundary of a nation and be more fertile as encountering with the reality of foreign migrant workers. Doing so, Korean literature can newly disclose ‘Asian others ? foreign migrant workers,’ whom it previously failed to properly recognize; and therefore embellish the sense of new literary ethics linking with the awareness of the issue.
What must not be disregarded in the pursuit of ‘plural modernity’ Korean literature has achieved up to now is, however, the pursuit of ‘plural modernity,’ which was investigated within the nation-state, the Republic of Korea; that is, within the framework of one individual nation’s crisis. Korea openly underwent the fictitiousness of such a framework of one single nation’s crisis by way of the IMF. Hence, despotism of the neoliberalist order deviated from a nation’s boundary and loomed large as a critical-pending question of the entire global crisis, ‘plural modernity’ Korean literature must pursue, has since confronted multifarious dilemmas that cannot be resolved by only a nation’s viewpoint. A sensitive issue in the Korean society among the dilemmas concerns the reality of foreign migrant workers. Korean literature in the previous viewpoint of a nation was to deal successfully with ‘singular modernity’ that centered in the Western society, which has perceived the critical reality of foreign migrant workers in Korea and revealed contradictions and ills of Korean capitalism. Korean literature desires a global reform to achieve the class liberation of workers as resolving the dilemmas. The scheme for pursuing ‘plural modernity’ setting about within such a boundary of a nation extends to the issue of foreign migrant workers, the severity of which gradually rises within the global boundary of the neoliberalist order.
Korean literature is hence confronted with a new assignment. The rapid influx of foreign migrant workers to the Korean society cannot be disregarded, and Korean literature must never overlook the agony in their life in the Korean society. The reality of their life becomes conscious in our life in this global system of the 21st century capitalism. The pursuit of ‘plural modernity’ in Korean literature in the interest of overcoming European-centered ‘singular modernity’ can allow a deviation from the boundary of a nation and be more fertile as encountering with the reality of foreign migrant workers. Doing so, Korean literature can newly disclose ‘Asian others ? foreign migrant workers,’ whom it previously failed to properly recognize; and therefore embellish the sense of new literary ethics linking with the awareness of the issue.
목차
1. 21세기 한국문학이 추구할‘복수의 근대성’
2. 외국인 이주노동자약소자의출현, 이중의 차별
3. 외국인 이주노동자약소자의 현실에 대한 주체적 각성
4. 서구 중심의 ‘단수의 근대’를 넘는 아시아적 타자들의 만남
5. 맺음말
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
김규동 초기시의 특성과 그 의미
비평문학
2018 .06
-
[특집/한국근대문학연구 비판] 한국근대문학사론과 근대성의 담론들 - 1930년대 후반 비평사 연구를 중심으로
한국근대문학연구
2001 .04
-
근대성 비판으로서의 "형식" : 김남천의 경우
현대소설연구
2001 .12
-
일제강점기 현대시 관련 근대성 담론의 층위와 특성
어문학
2011 .03
-
Thinking Modernity Historically: Is "Alternative Modernity" the Answer?
The Asian review of world histories
2013 .01
-
한국 근대성의 정당성 위기
동양철학연구
2009 .01
-
마음의 자신과의 대화 : 매슈 아널드의 모더니티 인식
외국문학연구
2004 .08
-
Colonial Modernity and the Making of Modern Korean Cities
Korea Journal
2008 .09
-
한국 근대문학과 동아시아적 맥락 ― 방법론 모색 노트
한국문학논총
2002 .01
-
모더니티의 ‘이면’으로서 라틴 아메리카
외국문학연구
2003 .11
-
중국의 현대성 문제와 동아시아 : 보편을 넘는 ‘보편공동체’의 재구성을 위하여
아시아문화연구
2008 .05
-
근대성 논의에서 패러다임과 방법론의 혁신 문제 : 식민지근대화론과 내재적 근대화론을 넘어 差異와 異種의 근대성으로
국어국문학
2009 .12
-
한국소설에 나타난 이주노동자의 재현 양상
어문론집
2009 .07
-
Rethinking Korean Literary Modernity
Korea Journal
1995 .12
-
일제강점기 한국인의 식민지 체험과 새로운 근대 기획
역사비평
2010 .02
-
Raising the Issue of ‘Modernity’ : ‘Colonial modernity’ theory as advanced by Japanese Korean Studies scholars and the background thereof
International Journal of Korean History
2012 .08
-
『확장하는 모더니티 - 1920∼30년대 근대 일본의 문화사』(요시미 슌야, 그레고리 M. 풀룩펠더 외, 연구공간 수유+너머 ‘일본근대와 젠더 세미나팀’ (역)/ 소명출판사, 2007, 325쪽)
여성과역사
2008 .01
-
Two Korea's Perceptions of the "Colonial Modernity" since 1945
International Journal of Korean History
2001 .12
-
새로운 문명학의 형식
이탈리아어문학
2011 .01
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-809-004309486