지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Korean society was called the a forceful anticommunist society based on National Security Law in the 1960s and 1970s. During the years there were a lot of spies and ‘reds’ in the prisons, and some of them became so-called unconverted long-term political prisoners. Their deplorable conditions in prison began to be disclosed at home and abroad in the process of the democratic movements in Korea since the 1980s. According to the North-South joint declaration in June 15, 62 persons of them could be repatriated to their families in North Korea on September 2, 2000.
What do human rights mean to them? Saying it by the square, as all of ordinary people might live with the poor human rights in those years, it seemed to be natural that those prisoners had to get on without the rights. They claimed that the minimum rights should be allowed for themselves as well as for the ordinary prisoners. Though they were in prison, the necessities of life as well as the freedom of conscience should have been allowed to them.
But the state did not grant them the freedom of conscience. Furthermore, it was unwilling to give proper necessities of life. Such a treatment itself was a kind of everyday and structural policy to convert them to South Korea within liberal democracy regime. As a result, everyday they had no choice but conversion or death.
This article tried to find the meaning of the everyday life of the unconverted long-term political prisoners. And it tried to study what their reaction about or against the penological treatment was. And it tried to find the reason why they should be put in solitary prisons, where they could occasionally move collectively. This is based on the oral history of unconverted long-term political prisoners by methodology of oral history.
What do human rights mean to them? Saying it by the square, as all of ordinary people might live with the poor human rights in those years, it seemed to be natural that those prisoners had to get on without the rights. They claimed that the minimum rights should be allowed for themselves as well as for the ordinary prisoners. Though they were in prison, the necessities of life as well as the freedom of conscience should have been allowed to them.
But the state did not grant them the freedom of conscience. Furthermore, it was unwilling to give proper necessities of life. Such a treatment itself was a kind of everyday and structural policy to convert them to South Korea within liberal democracy regime. As a result, everyday they had no choice but conversion or death.
This article tried to find the meaning of the everyday life of the unconverted long-term political prisoners. And it tried to study what their reaction about or against the penological treatment was. And it tried to find the reason why they should be put in solitary prisons, where they could occasionally move collectively. This is based on the oral history of unconverted long-term political prisoners by methodology of oral history.
목차
머리말
1. 비전향장기수 구술조사하기
2. 비전향장기수는 누구인가
3. 비전향장기수의 일상생활
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-905-004312428