메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
나민구 (수원대학교)
저널정보
한국수사학회 수사학 수사학 제13집
발행연도
2010.9
수록면
221 - 243 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The aim of this thesis is to analyze the Declarations of the current state of affairs by both professors and students who belong to three universities in Seoul, using the speech as a text for analysis. I'd like to find out how rhetoric-effectively such a kind of speech can be used by using rhetorical methodology for the purpose of analyzing it.
In conclusion, the scores of students were higher than those of professors by 2.5 average points, in terms of rhetorical sensitivity scale as a speech text, in which students achieved 8.3 points and professors 5.8 points respectively.
It can be explained in that students expressed their opinion more freely than professors as to a series of current affairs and their concerns about them. They gave a more concrete description about the situation and suggested alternatives to the improvements. They revealed their patriotism as youngsters and emotional sentiments to evoke public sympathy without reservation. In doing so, they vigorously invoked public empathy and participation, equipped with persuasive elements such as ethos, logos and pathos required for an effective speech.
On the other hand professors, the highest educated intellectuals, had no choice but to exercise restraints in expressing their emotions and therefore restrictively point out worrying current affairs. They limited their position to examining principles for the political realization of democracy in general and requesting a corresponding improvement. Thus it was natural that their rhetorical sensitivity scale for persuasion was less effective than that of students.

목차

1. 한국수사학회와 ‘레토릭 지수’ 평가 활동
2. 레토릭 텍스트로서의 연설문
3. 레토릭 효과 평가항목 설정과 배점
4. 평가항목별 평가 점수 부여
5. 마무리
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (6)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-802-004185303