지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
??This paper aims to examine closely the ecological thought of Calvin, through his enormous writings, per example, Institution, Commentary and Predication etc.
??Even though, Calvin's ecological thought has limitations, yet some of the following reasons tell us that it is valuable in many ways today.
??First, Calvin's thought insists that Men are essentially equal with the others creatures because all were created from the same origin, which is earth. Men and Nature are not separated. They do not have any conflict. Men cultivate land not for the purpose of the income or goods, but of the pleasure of the activity it -self, So men's relation with the creatures is of being it-self not of having.
??Second, Calvin's thought don't receive literally the text of Gn 1;28 'conquer the earth ... rule over all of the creature ... '. The thought interprets it in the very convivial and favorable perspective. He adopts the 'nurture' instead of 'conquest' or 'government' etc., in order to emphasize the thoughtful and careful relation between Men and other creatures. In that manner, he reminds Men's responsibility to nature.
??Third, likewise, Men's right of using nature is interpreted in the same manner. Though Calvin's thought accepts that Men have the right to use the goods of nature or the nature it-self, the right is neither unlimited nor unconditioned. His thought always calls for restrain and limit, and underlines the frugal usage of the goods, this is because nature is offered only for the survival and life to men.
??Fourth and last, Calvin's thoughtmaintains that the troublemaker is not nature but man. The created world is destructed by Men due to sin and corruption. In relation to the nature, Calvin's thought regards the avarice as cause of sin. Therefore it is man who have to bring essential changes. According to his thought, men have to improve the love relationship between themselves and nature, by riding themselves out of avarice and greed.
??In general, there is a tendency that the responsibility of destruction of nature is shifted on the occidental civilization and the christianism. At least in the thought of Calvin, we can not find any relation between the contemporary ecological problem and the christianism. If there is certain relation, that is of the opposite manner against the destructive civilization, in the supposition that the christianism is faithful to his teaching.
??Even though, Calvin's ecological thought has limitations, yet some of the following reasons tell us that it is valuable in many ways today.
??First, Calvin's thought insists that Men are essentially equal with the others creatures because all were created from the same origin, which is earth. Men and Nature are not separated. They do not have any conflict. Men cultivate land not for the purpose of the income or goods, but of the pleasure of the activity it -self, So men's relation with the creatures is of being it-self not of having.
??Second, Calvin's thought don't receive literally the text of Gn 1;28 'conquer the earth ... rule over all of the creature ... '. The thought interprets it in the very convivial and favorable perspective. He adopts the 'nurture' instead of 'conquest' or 'government' etc., in order to emphasize the thoughtful and careful relation between Men and other creatures. In that manner, he reminds Men's responsibility to nature.
??Third, likewise, Men's right of using nature is interpreted in the same manner. Though Calvin's thought accepts that Men have the right to use the goods of nature or the nature it-self, the right is neither unlimited nor unconditioned. His thought always calls for restrain and limit, and underlines the frugal usage of the goods, this is because nature is offered only for the survival and life to men.
??Fourth and last, Calvin's thoughtmaintains that the troublemaker is not nature but man. The created world is destructed by Men due to sin and corruption. In relation to the nature, Calvin's thought regards the avarice as cause of sin. Therefore it is man who have to bring essential changes. According to his thought, men have to improve the love relationship between themselves and nature, by riding themselves out of avarice and greed.
??In general, there is a tendency that the responsibility of destruction of nature is shifted on the occidental civilization and the christianism. At least in the thought of Calvin, we can not find any relation between the contemporary ecological problem and the christianism. If there is certain relation, that is of the opposite manner against the destructive civilization, in the supposition that the christianism is faithful to his teaching.
목차
Ⅰ. 칼뱅의 자연에 대한 사랑과 이해
Ⅱ. 칼뱅의 생태사상은 인간중심적인가?
Ⅲ. 인간이 자연과 맺는 관계와 청빈한 삶
Ⅳ. 자연과 생태계는 어떻게 회복될 수 있을까?
Ⅴ. 칼뱅 생태 사상의 현대적 의의
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Calvin의 “권세들” 이해
신학지남
2005 .12
-
칼빈의 해석은 영원한 진리? : 여성 본문에 대한 칼빈구약주석 연구
구약논단
2018 .03
-
인간은 병자인가? : 칼뱅의 죄인 이해
한국기독교신학논총
2011 .01
-
Calvin의 신인식론 : 자연신학적 문제를 중심으로
신학논단
1957 .03
-
칼빈의 종교적 관용에 대한 이해
한국기독교신학논총
2013 .01
-
칼뱅의 경제사상에 대한 고찰
한국기독교신학논총
2010 .04
-
칼뱅은 자본주의 정신의 선구자였나? : 그의 신관과 예정론, 성화론, 금욕주의를 중심으로
동서인문학
2012 .12
-
Calvin and the 21st Century Korean Church and Society
한국기독교신학논총
2010 .05
-
J. Calvin's Doctrine of the Church
신학연구
1974 .11
-
칼빈의 창조론
창조론오픈포럼
2020 .08
-
칼빈의 창조론
창조론오픈포럼
2008 .01
-
깔뱅의 ‘과학’(science) 이해
한국조직신학논총
2010 .01
-
칼뱅의 신학적 세계관에 나타난 선교사상과 그의 실천적 삶
신학지남
2014 .06
-
Calvin on Love: A Preliminary Summary
Hapshin Theological Review
2015 .12
-
Calvin's Geneva
신학지남
1978 .03
-
칼뱅의 여성 이해
한국조직신학논총
2010 .01
-
칼뱅의 공동체 사상
신학논단
2014 .03
-
칼뱅에 따른 성(性)문제들 : 간음과 음란, 매매춘, 성병, 동성애를 중심으로
장신논단
2011 .04
-
칼빈의 제왕시 주석 방법론 연구
구약논단
2017 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-230-004237315