지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
1954 Geneva Conference was the first and last international negotiation on the korean peninsula’s unification. Both UN leaded by America and Communist Sides did not expected the negotiation success. Geneva Conference ended only with increasing antagonism and distrust on the Korean Peninsula. This Article investigates the mutual effect of Korea and Indochina, two agenda of the Conference. Especially Indochina peace negotiation was a serious matter for the Chinese. China wanted the peaceful environments for the development of their domestic economy after the Korean War. This article points to the priority of chinese negotiation strategy. China concentrated on the urgent Indochina issue than complicated Korean issue.
On the other side, this article focuses on the relationship between Rhee government and Eisenhower administration around the Conference. There had been serious conflicts between two governments. Main issues in the Conflicts were the method of unification, mutual defence treaty and rebuilding Korean armed forces. This article particularly emphasizes two country’s different perception and strategy on the Northeast Asia region. Eisenhower administration considered the triangle alliance, between America, Korea and Japan. But Rhee didn’t accept the role of Japan. Rhee wanted korea’s initiative for the Anti-communist Bloc in East Asia and so suggested the dispatch of Korean troops to indochina.
This article concludes 1954 Geneva conference with loss an opportunity for the peaceful settlement in the Korean peninsula and Northeast Asia.
On the other side, this article focuses on the relationship between Rhee government and Eisenhower administration around the Conference. There had been serious conflicts between two governments. Main issues in the Conflicts were the method of unification, mutual defence treaty and rebuilding Korean armed forces. This article particularly emphasizes two country’s different perception and strategy on the Northeast Asia region. Eisenhower administration considered the triangle alliance, between America, Korea and Japan. But Rhee didn’t accept the role of Japan. Rhee wanted korea’s initiative for the Anti-communist Bloc in East Asia and so suggested the dispatch of Korean troops to indochina.
This article concludes 1954 Geneva conference with loss an opportunity for the peaceful settlement in the Korean peninsula and Northeast Asia.
목차
Ⅰ. 1954년 제네바 회담의 의미
Ⅱ. 한국전쟁 이후 질서와 제네바 회담
Ⅲ. 중국의 제네바 회담 전략: 코리아와 인도차이나의 관계
Ⅳ. 제네바 회담과 동북아 지역 전략을 둘러싼 한미 갈등
Ⅴ. 제네바 회담 이후 동북아 냉전질서
참고문헌
abstract
참고문헌 (44)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권오신 / 2005 / 아이젠하워 대외정책의 기조: ‘뉴룩(New Look)’ 정책과 ‘아이젠하워 독트린’ / 미국사연구 21 : 141 ~ 173
2. [단행본] - 권용립 / 1997 / 미국 대외정책사 / 민음사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김명섭 / 2005 / 서유럽의 통합과 동아시아의 분절:냉전초기 미국의 지정전략을 중심으로 / 국제정치논총 45 (2) : 7 ~ 28
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김보영 / 1997 / 제네바 정치회담과 남북한 통일정책의 비교연구 / 국사관논총 75
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 나종일 / 1988 / 제네바 정치회담에 관한 연구 / 연구논문 시리즈 88 (6)
2. [단행본] - 권용립 / 1997 / 미국 대외정책사 / 민음사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김명섭 / 2005 / 서유럽의 통합과 동아시아의 분절:냉전초기 미국의 지정전략을 중심으로 / 국제정치논총 45 (2) : 7 ~ 28
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김보영 / 1997 / 제네바 정치회담과 남북한 통일정책의 비교연구 / 국사관논총 75
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 나종일 / 1988 / 제네바 정치회담에 관한 연구 / 연구논문 시리즈 88 (6)
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-910-004173202