지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to provide contrastive analysis between experiential sentences and generic sentences in Mandarin Chinese. Both generic sentences and experiential sentences are relevant to the kind-referring and the set of situations, but they also have some differences in their aspect, quantification and negation. We can explain these differences and similarities with the cognitive perspective. In this paper, we propose that the similarities of both sentences are attributed to the fact that they profile the higher-order process. And we also assume that their differences are from instantiation and grounding of type. In Mandarin Chinese, grammatical aspect markers function as grounding predication, which turns verbs into finite clauses. Therefore, Chinese experiential sentences marked by ‘guo’ are the grounded instances. Generic sentences denote the instances in the structural plane, and experiential sentences denote the instances in the actual plane.
목차
1. 들어가는 글
2. Yeh(1993, 1996)의 양화사 접근법
3. 총칭문과 경험문의 특징
4. 총칭문과 경험문의 실례화와 고정화
5. 맺음말
〈參考文獻〉
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (4)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-820-004475522