메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Solutions of Executory Contracts in the Korea Consolidated Insolvency Act - focus on the License Agreement
Recommendations
Search
Questions

통합도산법상 미이행쌍무계약의 처리 : 특허실시계약관련 문제를 중심으로

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Weon-sam Lee (한국기업데이터)
Journal
Korea Business Law Association BUSINESS LAW REVIEW Vol.25 No.1 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2011.3
Pages
403 - 424 (22page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Solutions of Executory Contracts in the Korea Consolidated Insolvency Act - focus on the License Agreement
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
Recently, some companies consider Intellectual property rights as more valuable assets. They make a product protecting the Intellectual property Law and sell costly it. But generally licensors who patent Intellectual property rights is not making product. A plant of the making products are expensively. and they do not interest in making it. So License Agreement is prosper.
Rule maker did not intent the result of the Lubrizol case in 1985. But the court decided on the contrary to this. So U.S set rules for the licensor in bankruptcy in 1988 and follows Japan .But the Korea Consolidated Insolvency Act does not have any regulations as to protecting the licensee in the bankruptcy of the licensor.
Korea should not change the rule. But it is necessary to review related rules. This article deals with follows. What does the feature distinguish between License Agreement and other agreement? Which one is better between U.S system and Japan style?

Contents

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. Lubrizol 판결과 통합도산법의 문제점
Ⅲ. 주요국의 입법례
Ⅳ. 특허실시계약의 처리문제에 대한 해결책
Ⅴ. 결론
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉

References (4)

Add References

Related precedents (1)

1 / 1
  • 대법원 2004. 2. 27. 선고 2001다52759 판결

    [1] 의료장비 리스계약과 관련하여 이른바 공동리스약정을 체결한 甲과 乙 사이의 법률관계가 민법상 통상의 조합과 구별되는 조합적 성격을 내포하는 특수한 계약관계에 해당한다고 한 원심 판단을 수긍한 사례.

    View more

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-366-004451170