지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The pension insurance of public service units, which are characterized by public universities, exerted a huge burden on government finance. It not only hindered the establishment of a universal pension insurance but also created a huge gap between public service units and enterprises. On the other hand, the scope of labor force liquidity and the deployment of human resources are also emerged as big problems. As a result, it’s necessary to launch a reform centering this issue. Only in this way can we solve those problems and build a harmonious society.
However, the main content of this reform is sorting public universities into “semi- public benefit organization”, which, on one hand, makes professors, as reform targets, different from teachers who undertake compulsory education in elementary schools and junior high schools, and public officials. On the other hand, it makes the pension standard of public universities same as that in enterprises.
This article analyzes the data on the reform of pension insurance in public universities from the point of public interest. The result is as follows. When considering the expenditure for public use, tuition fee, educational expense per student, salary standard of professors, the fact of citizens’ low income into account, public universities can call public interest organizations.
However, the main content of this reform is sorting public universities into “semi- public benefit organization”, which, on one hand, makes professors, as reform targets, different from teachers who undertake compulsory education in elementary schools and junior high schools, and public officials. On the other hand, it makes the pension standard of public universities same as that in enterprises.
This article analyzes the data on the reform of pension insurance in public universities from the point of public interest. The result is as follows. When considering the expenditure for public use, tuition fee, educational expense per student, salary standard of professors, the fact of citizens’ low income into account, public universities can call public interest organizations.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중국의 양로보험, 특히 사업단위 양로보험의 현황과 한계
Ⅲ. 국공립 대학교수 양로보험 개혁의 문제점
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-349-000422221